New Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Filing - Avadim Health Inc.

North Carolina-based Avadim Health Inc. and four affiliates (together, the “debtors”) filed chapter 11 bankruptcy cases in the District of Delaware over the Memorial Day holiday. The “vertically integrated healthcare and wellness company” intends to “expeditiously complete a third-party sale of substantially all of the Company’s assets” to their pre-petition secured lenders (Hayfin Services LLP), who have agreed not only to serve as stalking horse purchaser but DIP lenders.

Historically, the debtors have sold topical products like pre-saturated towelettes, foaming, spray and other products B2B to acute care hospitals, nursing homes, and long-term care facilities. In 2016, nine years after their founding, the debtors expanded to B2C, unleashing their products in over 47k pharmacy locations and later adding its own website and an Amazon Inc. ($AMZN) presence to the mix. Between ‘17 and ‘19, the debtors’ annual net revenues popped from $10.8mm to $45.8mm.

On the liability side of the ledger, the debtors historically used debt, private placements of equity, convertible notes and revenues to fund ops. The capital structure includes:

  • $79.6mm term loan;

  • $22mm senior secured notes;

  • $6.4mm 6% unsecured convertible notes; and

  • $2.01mm 1% unsecured PPP loan due 4/22.

The company also owes $4.8mm pursuant to a settlement agreement tied to a patent dispute.

Remember those rising revenues? Yeah, well, that’s all fine and good unless it’s entirely offset by significant selling and marketing expenses and excess inventory build-up because not as many institutions want your product than you modeled out. This bit is brutal:

The Company’s sales related expenses resulted in limited free cash flow to fund other operating expenses, debt service, and investment in new products. In particular, the Company ramped up significant media/marketing expenditures and built up inventory in anticipation of its previously planned early 2020 IPO; however, that IPO never materialized.

Oh, wait, it gets worse:

Notwithstanding spending tens of millions of dollars over the past decade to build the Company’s brand, the Company has been unsuccessful in reaching profitability.

Ok, sorry, folks, but when we think of “brand” we think of LVMH, the parent company of luxury brands like Dior, Louis Vuitton, and Tiffany. In other words, a company with a market cap over 320b Euro which, earlier this month, made Bernard Arnault the richest person in the world (yes, over Jeff Bezos and Elon Musk). We DON’T think of “Theraworx Protect” (the debtors’ immune health line), Theraworx Protect U-Pak (the urinary health line) or Combat One (for soldier and first responder readiness). And we DEFINITELY don’t think of a company that lost $49.5mm $34.8mm and $53.6mm in ‘18, ‘19 and ‘20 respectively.

Apparently neither does the market. The IPO failed. Thereafter, the company initiated a strategic alternatives review that came up empty (with marketing taking place from March ‘20 through October ‘20 … poor timing). This is when the army of restructuring pros got involved, including independent directors on a “Restructuring Committee,” a CRO and some bankers for good measure. All roads, however, led back to the pre-petition secured lenders owed more than $102mm in principal amounts under the term loan and the secured notes. Apparently nobody else wanted to hop aboard a ship that (a) “[o]ver the past few years … [has] been perpetually distressed, constantly facing liquidity crunches and incurring defaults under the [term loan]” and (b) had to enter into “seven amendments to their [term loan] since June 2019, increasing the principal amount available to the Debtors, expanding interest obligations owed to the lenders, and extending maturities.

So, uh, why would anyone else want to get in on this?!?

As noted above, they don’t. The pre-petition lenders, on the other hand, are in a solid position to make a grab for valuable tax attributes and net operating losses!

MIDAVA HOLDINGS 3, INC. is the new entity formed by the pre-petition lenders to serve as stalking horse. The proposed DIP is $7.156mm at L+12%.

The debtors are represented by Chapman and Cutler LLP (Larry Halperin, Joon Hong) & Pachulski Stang Ziehl & Jones LLP (Laura Davis Jones, David Bertenthal, Timothy Cairns) as legal counsel, Carl Marks Advisors (Keith Daniels) as financial advisor and CRO, SSG Capital Advisors LLC as banker and Omni Agent Solutions as claims agent. Hayfin is represented by Weil Gotshal & Manges LLP (David Griffiths, Bryan Podzius, Rachael Foust) & Richards Layton & Finger PA (Paul Heath, Zachary Shapiro, Cavid Queroli).

The first day hearing is scheduled for later this morning at 11am ET.


Date: May 31, 2021

Jurisdiction: D. of Delaware (Judge Goldblatt)

Capital Structure: see above

Company Professionals:

  • Legal: Chapman and Cutler LLP (Larry Halperin, Joon Hong) & Pachulski Stang Ziehl & Jones LLP (Laura Davis Jones, David Bertenthal, Timothy Cairns)

  • Board of Directors: Dewey Andrew, Linda McGoldrick, Charles Owen III, Steven Panagos, Karan Rai, James Rosati, Stephen Woody

  • Financial Advisor/CRO: Carl Marks Advisors (Keith Daniels)

  • Investment Banker: SSG Capital Advisors LLC

  • Claims Agent: Omni Agent Solutions (Click here for free docket access)

Other Parties in Interest:

  • Term Loan Agent: Hayfin Services LLP

    • Legal: Weil Gotshal & Manges LLP (David Griffiths, Bryan Podzius, Rachael Foust) & Richards Layton & Finger PA (Paul Heath, Zachary Shapiro, Cavid Queroli)

⛽️New Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Filing - Nine Point Energy Holdings Inc.⛽️

Nine Point Energy Holdings Inc.

Colorado-based Nine Point Energy Holdings Inc. (along with three affiliates, the “debtors”) is and independent oil and gas exploration and production company focused on the Williston Basin in North Dakota and Montana. It is the successor to Triangle USA Petroleum Corporation, which filed for chapter 11 bankruptcy in June 2016 and confirmed a plan in March 2017. Four years later, it’s back in bankruptcy court. 😬

Followers of E&P bankruptcies have become accustomed to disputes relating to E&P companies and their midstream gathering, transportation and processing providers. Here, Caliber Midstream Partners LP was the debtors’ largest midstream services provider — “was” being the operative word after the debtors terminated the long-term midstream services agreements on the eve of bankruptcy. The story, however, doesn’t end there.

The debtors are willing to enter into a new arrangement with Caliber going forward. It’s unclear how the new arrangement might differ from the existing arrangement because redaction, redaction, redaction. The economic terms of the contract have not been disclosed. 🤔

And so here we are with another potential “running with the land” scenario. If you’re unfamiliar with what this is, you clearly haven’t been paying attention to E&P bankruptcy cases. Just Google it and you’ll pull up probably 8928394829248929 law firm articles on the topic. As this will be a major driver in the case, it probably makes sense to refresh your recollection.

Why are the debtors in bankruptcy? All of the usual reasons, e.g., the big drop in oil prices thanks to COVID-19 and Russia/OPEC. Nothing really new there.

So what does this filing achieve? For starters, it will give the debtors an opportunity to address the Caliber contracts. Moreover, it will avail the debtors of a DIP facility from their pre-petition lenders in the amount of ~$72mm — $18mm in new money and $54mm on a rollup basis (exclusive of an additional $16.1mm roll-up to account for pre-petition secured swap obligations)(8% interest with 2% commitment fee). Finally, the pre-petition-cum-DIP-lenders have agreed to serve as the stalking horse purchaser of the debtors’ assets with a credit bid floor of $250mm.


Date: March 15, 2021

Jurisdiction: D. of Delaware (Judge Walrath)

Capital Structure: $256.9mm credit facility, $16.1mm swap obligations

Company Professionals:

  • Legal: Latham & Watkins LLP (Richard Levy, Caroline Reckler, Jonathan Gordon, George Davis, Nacif Taousse, Alistair Fatheazam, Jonathan Weichselbaum, Andrew Sorkin, Heather Waller, Amanda Rose Stanzione, Elizabeth Morris, Sohom Datta) & Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor LLP (Michael Nestor, Kara Hammond Coyle, Ashley Jacobs, Jacob Morton)

  • Board of Directors: Patrick Bartels Jr., Dominic Spencer, Frederic Brace, Gary Begeman, Alan Dawes

  • Financial Advisor: AlixPartners LLP (John Castellano)

  • Investment Banker: Perella Weinberg Partners LP (John Cesarz)

  • Claims Agent: Stretto (Click here for free docket access)

Other Parties in Interest:

  • Pre-petition & DIP Agent: AB Private Credit Investors LLC

    • Legal: Proskauer Rose LLP (Charles Dale, David Hillman, Michael Mervis, Megan Volin, Paul Possinger, Jordan Sazant) & Landis Rath & Cobb LLP (Adam Landis, Kerri Mumford, Matthew Pierce)

  • Ad Hoc Group of Equityholders: Shenkman Capital Management, JP Morgan Securities LLC, Canyon Capital Advisors LLC, Chambers Energy Capital

    • Legal: Willkie Farr & Gallagher LLP (Jeffrey Pawlitz, Matthew Dunn, Mark Stancil) & Richards Layton & Finger PA (John Knight, Amanda Steele, David Queroli)

  • Midstream Counterparty: Caliber Measurement Services LLC, Caliber Midstream Fresh Water Partners LLC, and Caliber North Dakota LLC

    • Legal: Weil Gotshal & Manges LLP (Alfredo Perez, Brenda Funk, Tristan Sierra, Edward Soto, Lauren Alexander) & Morris Nichols Arsht & Tunnell LLP (Curtis Miller, Taylor Haga, Nader Amer)

📺New Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Filing - MobiTV Inc.📺

MobiTV Inc.

On Monday, Emeryville, California-based MobiTV, Inc. and an affiliated debtor filed for chapter 11 bankruptcy in the District of Delaware. MobiTV is “a creative thinking technology company making TV better.” Which is funny because we’re willing to bet that literally nobody thinks about MobiTV when they think about whether they enjoy their television-watching user experience. Anyway, what that actually means is MobiTV sells a white-label software application to cable providers that allows consumers to stream programming on (i) streaming devices like Roku, Apple TV, Amazon Fire TV, XBox or (ii) a smart TV, without the need for a set-top cable box. Key customers include T-Mobile USA Inc. ($TMUS) and over 120 cable/broadband television providers to deliver content to over 300k end user subscribers. In other words, if you’re streaming HBO via T-Mobile, your experience may very well be powered by MobiTV.

MobiTV has been around since 2000 and had gone through several shifts in its fortunes and business model. In 2020, MobiTV generated $13M in revenue with an operating loss of approximately $34M. That is a long fall from grace for a company that filed for an IPO in 2011 with reported 2010 sales of $67M. At the time, MobiTV was entirely focused on providing licensed TV programming to the personal devices of customers on wireless networks with AT&T Inc. ($T)Sprint, and T-Mobile accounting for almost all of the company’s revenues. MobiTV had raised over $110M from investors like Menlo VenturesRedpoint VenturesAdobe Ventures, and Hearst Ventures.

But despite its rosy trajectory, MobiTV withdrew its IPO filing a few months later citing unfavorable market conditions. In hindsight, there were obviously deeper problems with the business model. Broadcast TV viewing on mobile devices failed to take off in the way the company predicted and MobiTV pivoted away from serving wireless carriers.

Its new target customer was midsize cable providers. Set-top boxes have long been at the center of consumers interactions with cable providers. But these boxes have plenty of drawbacks:

Pay-TV providers (and their consumers) are looking for a way beyond set-top boxes, which can be expensive for consumers to buy, costly to maintain for the pay-TV providers and often limited in their functionality. Their clunkiness, in fact, has made them ripe for disruption, and many now opt for lighter options like Fire TV or Apple TV to bypass those services altogether. In other words, pay-TV providers need to find other routes to providing services to customers that can compete better with the newer generation of video services. (emphasis added)

MobiTV saw the shift towards streaming devices and smart TVs and aimed to position itself as a “television as a service provider” to midsized cable providers like C SpireDirectLink, and Citizens Fiber. These companies lack the R&D budgets of the likes of Comcast Corporation ($CMCSA) to invest in user interface and software applications in their set-top boxes. In 2017, MobiTV raised $21M from Oak Investment Partners and Ally Bank ($ALLY) (at a reported ~$400M valuation!) to develop its MobiTV ConnectTM Platform, “a product for pay TV and on-demand TV providers to stream broadcast TV and offer other services, like catch-up and recording, without the need of a set-top box.

The idea was to capture some of the “customer ownership” that was slipping from cable set-top boxes to streaming devices and services. In 2019, MobiTV raised $50M more from Oak Investment Partners and Ally Bank as well as Cedar Grove Partners to fund further growth. At the time, MobiTV had about 90 cable providers signed up as customers.

Middlemen can make good money and at first glance it seemed like MobiTV might have been able to carve out a position for itself. MobiTV offered cable providers a small way to stem the tide of cord cutting and the proliferation of streaming services like HBO MaxNetflix Inc ($NFLX)Hulu, and the rest. As TechCrunch laid out, “The pitch that MobiTV makes to pay TV providers goes something like this:”

…set-top-box-free pay TV services gives operators a wider array of channels and potentially more flexibility in how they are provisioned. At the same time, a solution like MobiTV’s potentially lowers the total cost of ownership for providers by removing the need for the set-top boxes.

That’s not to say that some of its customers are not using both, though: they can provide a certain set of channels directly through boxes, and the MobiTV service gives them the option of having another set that are offered on top of that.

By 2020, MobiTV’s customer base had grown to about 120 midsize cable TV operators as well as legacy T-Mobile customers. Revenue was growing and its subscribers and customers bases were both increasing. So what the hell happened here? 🤔

An agnostic software solution for cable providers to capture some of the shift towards streaming? Coupled with more people stuck at home from a pandemic? If this product were ever going to work, one would think it would have been during the last year. From the First Day Declaration:

That’s the entirety of section D. Maybe we are dense but it would be interesting to know what exactly about the COVID-19 pandemic and related stay-at-home orders materially impaired the Company’s growth opportunities. Seems like that should have been good for business, no?

But we can speculate.

As every content provider has rolled out their own streaming service over the last twelve months, MobiTV was probably in the worst position in the entire television streaming value chain. On the supply side, content providers are focused on promoting their own streaming services and have little reason to give any sort of pricing concessions to a niche service provider like MobiTV. This surely kept MobiTV’s licensing costs at an elevated level.

On the demand side, consumers likely were not calling in to their cable providers demanding MobiTV considering they could get the same content with a $30 Roku, their streaming subscriptions, and their broadband bill. Cable providers apparently were willing to pay for the service, but not enough to keep the company from losing money.

After 20 years of trying to figure out what its business model was, MobiTV finally threw in the towel and management took COVID cover.

The “tell” that the business issues were more elemental than COVID? The fact that the company has been operating under a series of 17 amendments and forbearance agreements.

At the time of its Ch. 11 filing, MobiTV had ~$25M of debt obligations, owed entirely to its sole pre-petition secured lender, Ally Bank.

In 2017 Ally Bank provided MobiTV a $10M term loan as well as a $5M revolving credit facility which was fully drawn. The original maturity of these loans was February 3, 2019, but following the aforementioned amendments and forbearance agreements, the maturity date was pushed back to January 2021. To fund the business in the interim, Oak Investment Partners threw good money after bad, underwriting three Subordinated Convertible Promissory Notes on August 6, 2020 ($4mm); December 14, 2020 ($1mm); and December 30, 2020 ($0.3mm). As a condition to one of Ally Bank’s credit amendments, MobiTV engaged FTI Capital Advisors LLC to evaluate strategic alternatives. A subsequent marketing effort came up empty: the “alternatives” were non-existent.

Consequently, on January 29, 2021, MobiTV and Ally Bank entered into another amendment and forbearance. T-Mobile — the customer most reliant upon the MobiTV’s services — provided $2.5mm in bridge financing lest they upset thousands of customers right around Super Bowl time. On February 12, 2021, T-Mobile agreed to provide an additional ~$2.3mm and Ally Bank agreed to forbear until February 26, 2021.

Following negotiations with Ally Bank and T-Mobile, the interested parties concluded that a sale process should be implemented through the filing of chapter 11. An affiliate of T-Mobile, TVN Ventures, LLC, has committed to a $15mm DIP credit facility (12%), junior to the pre-existing pre-petition Ally Bank position. As of this writing, management is still seeking a stalking horse bidder to backstop the sale process.

At $13mm of revenue with an operating loss that high, there’s a very good chance that T-Mobile knows it’s buying this thing with that DIP commitment.


Date: March 1, 2021

Jurisdiction: D. of Delaware (Judge Silverstein)

Capital Structure: $25mm funded debt

Company Professionals:

  • Legal: Pachulski Stang Ziehl & Jones LLP (Debra Grassgreen, Mary Caloway, Maxim Litvak, Nina Hong, Jason Rosell)

  • Financial Advisor: FTI Consulting Inc. (Chris LeWand, Catherine Moran, Chris Post, Chris Tennenbaum, Doug Edelman)

  • Claims Agent: Stretto (Click here for free docket access)

Other Parties in Interest:

  • DIP Lender: T-Mobile USA Inc. and TVN Ventures LLC

    • Legal: Alston & Bird LLP (William Sugden, Jacob Johnson) & Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor LLP (Edmon Morton, Kenneth Enos)

  • Silicon Valley Bank

    • Legal: Morrison Foerster LLP (Alexander Rheaume, Benjamin Butterfield) & Ashby & Geddes LLP (Gregory Taylor, Katharina Earle)

  • Ally Bank

    • Legal: McGuireWoods LLP (Kenneth Noble, Kristin Wigness, Ha Young Chung) & Richards Layton & Finger PA (John Knight, David Queroli)

  • Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors:

    • Legal: Fox Rothschild LLP (Seth Niederman, Michael Sweet, Gordon Gouveia)

New Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Filing - Golden Eagle Entertainment $ENT

Golden Eagle Entertainment

July 22, 2020

Suffice it to say, high correlation to the airline and cruiseline industries is a credit negative these days. A few months ago Speedcast — a provider of information technology services and (largely satellite-dependent) communications solutions (i.e., cybersecurity, content solutions, data and voice apps, IoT, network systems) to customers in the cruise, energy, government and commercial maritime businesses — discovered this the hard way and free fell into bankruptcy court. There’s still no resolution of that case. Similarly, Global Eagle Entertainment Inc. ($ENT), a business that generates revenue by (i) licensing and managing media and entertainment content and providing related services to customers in the airline, maritime and other “away-from-home” nontheatrical markets, and (ii) providing satellite-based Internet access and other connectivity solutions to airlines, cruise ships and other markets, couldn’t avoid trouble once COVID-19 shutdown its core end users. No monthly recurring revenue model can save a company when its clients are effectively closed for business AND there’s $855.6mm of funded debt to service. Not to state the obvious.

Things may get worse before they get better. The company’s largest customer is Southwest Airlines Co. ($LUV) (21% of overall revenue) and it has a pretty bearish take on …

TO READ THE REST OF THIS POST, YOU MUST BE A PETITION MEMBER. YOU CAN BECOME ONE HERE.


  • Jurisdiction: D. of Delaware (Judge Dorsey)

  • Capital Structure: $85mm RCF, $503.3mm TL, $188.7mm second lien notes, $82.5mm unsecured convertible notes.

  • Professionals:

    • Legal: Latham & Watkins LLP (George Davis, Madeleine Parish, Ted Dillman, Helena Tseregounis, Nicholas Messana, Eric Leon) & Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor LLP (Michael Nestor, Kara Hammond, Betsy Feldman)

    • Financial Advisor: Alvarez & Marsal LLC

    • Investment Banker: Greenhill & Co. Inc.

    • Claims Agent: Prime Clerk LLC (*click on the link above for free docket access)

  • Other Parties in Interest:

    • Prepetition First Lien Admin Agent & DIP Agent: Citibank NA

      • Legal: Weil Gotshal & Manges LLP (David Griffiths, Bryan Podzius)

    • Ad Hoc DIP & First Lien Lender Group: Apollo Global Management, L.P., Eaton Vance Management, Arbour Lane Capital Management, Sound Point Capital Management, Carlyle Investment Management LLC, Mudrick Capital Management, BlackRock Financial Management, Inc.

      • Legal: Gibson Dunn & Crutcher LLP (Scott Greenberg, Michael Cohen, Jason Goldstein) & Pachulski Stang Ziehl & Jones LLP (Laura Davis Jones, TImothy Cairns)

    • Second Lien Agent: Cortland Capital Market Services LLC

    • Second Lien Noteholders: Searchlight Capital Partners LP

      • Legal: Paul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison LLP (Alan Kornberg, Michael Turkel, Irene Blumberg, Elizabeth Sacksteder) & Richards Layton & Finger PA (Daniel DeFranceschi, Zachary Shapiro)

    • Southwest Airlines Inc.

      • Legal: Vinson & Elkins LLP (William Wallander, Paul Heath, Robert Kimball, Matthew Struble) & Saul Ewing Arnstein & Lehr LLP (Lucian Murley)

    • AT&T Corp.

      • Legal: Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP (Brian Lohan) & Morris Nichols Arsht & Tunnell LLP (Derek Abbott, Brett Turlington)

    • Terry Steiner International

      • Legal: Loeb & Loeb LLP (Daniel Besikof, Geneva Shi)

    • Telesat International Limited

      • Legal: Hodgson Russ LLP (Garry Graber)

    • Nantahala Capital Management LLC

      • Legal: King & Spalding LLP (Arthur Steinberg, Scott Davidson) & The Rosner Law Group LLC (Frederick Rosner, Jason Gibson)

New Chapter 33 Bankruptcy Filing - NorthEast Gas Generation LLC

NorthEast Gas Generation LLC

June 18, 2020

Texas-based NorthEast Gas Generation LLC (along with three affiliates, the “debtors”), an indirect subsidiary of non-debtors Talen Energy Corporation and NorthEast Gas Generation Holdings LLC (f/k/a MACH Gen LLC), filed for bankruptcy in the District of Delaware. This is the third chapter 11 in six years. You could be excused for thinking that, after two prior rodeos, the balance sheet would be pretty light. Alas, that is not the case. The debtors have $585.2mm of funded indebtedness split between a $554.7mm first lien credit facility and a much smaller $30.5mm second lien credit facility (PETITION Note: there are also LOCs of $23.2mm). Behind all of that is approximately $10.5mm of trade debt.

Low natural gas prices have persisted, unfortunately, and that has placed downward pressure on electric energy prices. Moreover, supply continues to outpace demand thanks to energy saving tech, alternatives, and more. Apparently global warming ain’t helping either: a warmer-than-normal winter reduced home heating levels. All of these factors affected the debtors’ ability to generate revenue and service their debt. The bankruptcy filed was tripped by the urgent need for liquidity and the ability to enter into a DIP financing agreement. This critical funding will bridge the debtors to some sort of transaction that will “allow them to effectuate an orderly restructuring process in chapter 11, pursuant to which the Debtors anticipate consummating a transaction that will transfer, sell, or otherwise convey substantially all of the Debtors’ assets to the First Lien Secured Parties or their designee.

  • Jurisdiction: D. of Delaware (Judge Walrath)

  • Capital Structure: $585.2mm

  • Professionals:

    • Legal: Richards Layton & Finger PA (Mark Collins, Dan DeFranceschi, Jason Madron, Brendan Schlauch)

    • Financial Advisor: Alvarez & Marsal LLC

    • Investment Banker: Houlihan Lokey Capital Inc.

    • Claims Agent: Prime Clerk LLC (*click on the link above for free docket access)

  • Other Parties in Interest:

    • DIP Admin Agent & DIP Lenders: CLMG Corp. & Beal Bank USA & Beal Bank SSB

      • Legal: White & Case LLP (Scott Greissman, Philip Abelson, Elizabeth Feld, Rashida Adams) & Fox Rothschild LLP (Jeffrey Schlerf)

    • Talen Energy Supply LLC

      • Weil Gotshal & Manges LLP (Matt Barr, Bryan Podzius, Alexander Welch, Ronit Berkovich & Morris Nichols Arsht & Tunnell LLP (Robert Dehney, Taylor Haga)

💪 New Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Filing - 24 Hour Fitness Inc. 💪

24 Hour Fitness Inc.

June 15, 2020

California-based 24 Hour Fitness Inc. (along with ten affiliates, the “debtors”) filed for chapter 11 bankruptcy in the District of Delaware after it became apparent that it’s hard to sustain a fitness business when, as a practical matter, you’re really 0 Hour Fitness Inc. When you have 3.4mm customers across 445 (leased) locations across the United States, it’s awfully hard for a business that typically does $1.5b in revenue and $191 in adjusted EBITDA to make money when a pandemic rips through the nation and shuts down business entirely. This, ladies and gentlemen, like the few airlines who have filed for bankruptcy to date, is as pure-play a COVID-19 story as they come these days.

Now, that’s to not to suggest that everything was copacetic prior to the quarantine. The business had some pimples on it. The debtors’ CRO cites the selling/operating model’s negative impact on financial performance. But the biggest and scariest pimples are the debtors’ balance sheet and lease portfolio. The former includes $1.4b of funded debt; the latter, 445 locations leased across the country, of which 135 have already been deemed unnecessary and are the subject of a first day executory contract rejection motion (PETITION Note: the debtors denote this as “a first wave.”). When revenues stop coming into the coffers, these tremendous amounts become quite an overhang and a liquidity drain.

The filing, among other things, helps solve for the liquidity issue. The debtors have obtained a commitment for a $250mm new-money senior secured DIP facility from an ad hoc group of lenders. While there is no restructuring support agreement in place here, the ad hoc group is comprised of 63.3% of the aggregate principal amount outstanding under the prepetition credit facility and approximately 73.9% of the face amount of the $500mm in senior unsecured notes. In other words, there’s a solid amount of support here but not enough yet to command the senior class of debt.

Luckily, the debtors gave themselves a form of pre-DIP. Wait. Huh? What are we referring to?

…the Debtors were obliged to close all of their fitness clubs nationwide on March 16, 2020, in response to this national emergency. As a result, the Debtors were no longer able to generate new sources of revenue (by winning new members) and, on or about April 15, 2020, the Debtors suspended billing on account of monthly membership dues.fn

In the footnote, the debtors note:

To date, litigation has been commenced in connection with the Debtors’ monthly billing on a post-March 16 basis, notwithstanding, among other things, the Debtors’ rights under their various membership agreements. The Debtors reserve all rights, claims, and defenses in this regard.

Uh, apparently, 0 Hour Fitness Inc. = 30 Days of Payment Inc. We’ll see whether this short-term liquidity grab created long term customer retention issues.*

Moreover, the fact that they apparently laid off thousands of employees via conference call probably won’t amount to a whole lot of goodwill. Just sayin’.

Now it’s wait and see. The debtors have reopened approximately 20 locations in Texas and hope to have the majority of their other non-rejected clubs open by the end of June. We’ll see if the uptick in COVID cases in certain states throws a wrench in that plan. To combat any COVID-related perception risk, the debtors are instituting some new measures:

…the Debtors have taken an innovative approach to the reopening of their clubs, instituting market-leading strategies to keep their members and employees safe, including an app-based reservation system to ensure that their clubs remain in compliance with applicable social distancing guidelines, a touchless check-in system to limit members’ and employees’ contact with surfaces, and cleaning schedules that ensure that entire clubs are sanitized every hour. (emphasis added)

Gosh. We see sh*t like this — the airlines are also making similar statements about newly implemented cleanliness standards — and it really makes us wonder: what the bloody hell were these cesspools doing pre-COVID?!?!? Clearly not enough.

And, yet, otherwise, we have some sympathy for these businesses. This is a brand new paradigm. The debtors indicate that they’re implementing a reservation-based system where people are locked into an hour-max workout after which the gym will be closed for 30 minutes for a “deep clean.” That is not exactly a seamless and frictionless user experience. Moreover, what kind of chemicals are going to be dumped all over the facility every 60 minutes? These are tough issues.

As far as social distancing:

…the Debtors are utilizing space in their clubs in creative ways in order to continue to offer members a range of amenities and services. For example, the Debtors are utilizing their basketball courts to hold group exercise classes, including by relocating stationary bike equipment to continue to offer indoor cycling classes, so that members and equipment can be properly spaced to comply with social distancing guidelines.

Source: First Day Declaration

Source: First Day Declaration

No offense but does THIS really worth going to the gym for? You can use apps for a fraction of the cost and do this at home…mask-less.

So what now?

The DIP financing will buy the debtors some time to evaluate new trends. Will those people who paid for a month when the gym was closed come back? Will the news about employee treatment effect the “brand”? Will all of those people who bought home gyms or learned to run need to go to a gym? The re-opening notwithstanding, all of these questions will directly impact valuation. Indeed, how do you value this business with so many massive question marks? Well, luckily, we have the debt to get a sense of what that answer might be. And considering that, at the time of this writing, the term loan is bid in the high 20s and the unsecured notes are bid around 3 — that’s right, 3 — it’s pretty clear who is getting (generally) wiped out in this scenario and where the market thinks the value breaks.

*Honestly, this was a dirty move but from the debtors’ perspective, it also totally makes sense.

  • Jurisdiction: D. of Delaware (Judge Owens)

  • Capital Structure: $95.2mm ‘23 RCF, $835.1mm ‘25 Term Loan, $500mm 8% ‘22 unsecured notes (Wells Fargo Bank NA)

  • Professionals:

    • Legal: Weil Gotshal & Manges LLP (Ray Schrock, Ryan Preston Dahl, Kevin Bostel, Kyle Satterfield, Ramsey Scofield, Jackson Que Alldredge, Jacob Mezei, Alexander Cohen, Sarah Schnorrenberg) & Pachulski Stang Ziehl & Jones LLP (Laura Davis Jones, Timothy Cairns, Peter Keane)

    • Directors: Marc Beilinson, Stephen Hare, Roland Smith

    • Financial Advisor/CRO: FTI Consulting Inc. (Daniel Hugo)

    • Investment Banker: Lazard Freres & Co. LLC (Tyler Cowan)

    • Real Estate Advisor: Hilco Real Estate LLC

    • Claims Agent: Prime Clerk LLC (*click on the link above for free docket access)

  • Other Parties in Interest:

    • Ad Hoc Group

      • Legal: O’Melveny & Myers LLP (John Rapisardi, Adam Rogoff, Daniel Shamah, Diana Perez, Adam Haberkorn) & Richards Layton & Finger PA (Mark Collins, Michael Merchant, David Queroli)

    • Prepetition Agent: Morgan Stanley Senior Funding Inc.

      • Legal: Latham & Watkins LLP (Alfred Xue)

    • DIP Agent: Wilmington Trust

      • Legal: Covington & Burling (Ronald Hewitt)

    • Senior Notes Indenture Trustee: Wells Fargo Bank NA

      • Legal: Reed Smith LLP (Eric Schaffer, Luke Sizemore, Mark Eckard)

    • Large equityholders: AEA, Fitness Capital Partners LP, 2411967 Ontario Limited

⛽️ New Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Filing - Templar Energy LLC ⛽️

Templar Energy LLC

May 31, 2020

Templar Energy LLC (and six affiliates, the “debtors”), an Oklahoma City-based independent oil and gas exploration and production company that operates primarily in the Greater Anadarko Basin of Western Oklahoma and the Texas Panhandle, filed a prepackaged plan of liquidation early Monday morning — the culmination of a multi-year effort to stave off the inevitable.

A quick flashback. Four years ago oil and gas companies were collapsing into bankruptcy left and right. After oil and gas prices fell hard, the oil and gas tide rolled out and left a lot of investors stranded naked on the beach. Most funds were of the view that this was just a hiccup. One fund after another raised billions after billions of dollars thinking that energy was “where it’s at.” We now know how off-kilter that thesis was.

Some companies back then were luckier than others. Thanks in large part to its relatively simple and highly concentrated capital structure and a clear demarcation of value based on prevailing commodity prices of the time, in September 2016, Templar Energy was able to consummate an out-of-court restructuring that extinguished $1.45b of second lien debt. Repeat: $1.45 BILLION of second lien debt — a tremendous amount of value destruction a mere four years after the company’s formation. Of course, as with all things there are nuances here. “Value destruction” is a relative phrase that applies to the par holders of the debt when originally issued. Certain second lien lenders who participated in the out-of-court restructuring may very well have purchased the paper for cents on the dollar once the par guys had to pull the ripcord. Destruction there, therefore, is a function of price. There’s no way to know (from publicly available information) whether any of the original holders of second lien paper came out ahead upon receiving $133mm in cash and 45% of the equity in exchange for their second lien paper. It’s certainly possible that some did.

It’s also highly probable that some didn’t. Take Ares Management LLC, Bain Capital and Paulson & Co. Inc. for instance; they each participated in a rights offering for participating preferred equity in the company in exchange for $220mm dumped into this turd (plus $145mm placed by legacy equity holders). Given that the RBL IS NOW IMPAIRED here, clearly that equity check hasn’t borne fruit. It was also used to pay the aforementioned $133mm of cash recovery so … suffice it to say … this does not seem like one that the aforementioned funds will be referencing in future LP-oriented marketing materials.

Emanating out of that ‘16 transaction is the debtors’ current $600mm RBL. This time around, it is the fulcrum security. The debtors note, “Critically the claims under the RBL Facility are deeply impaired.” And the RBL lenders have no intention of owning the assets — predominantly leases with various oil and gas mineral owners covering non-exclusive working interests in approximately 2,165 oil and gas wells over approximately 273,400 continuous acres of property. Let’s be clear here: first lien lenders generally aren’t in the business of horizontal drilling and hydraulic fracking. Of course, right now, the debtors aren’t really in the business of horizontal drilling and hydraulic fracking. At least technically speaking. Given where oil and gas prices are — thanks Putin/MBS on the supply side, COVID-19 on the demand side — the debtors aren’t even conducting any drilling. Typically they operate anywhere up to 13 rigs at a time. All of which is to say that the lenders’ position explains why this is a sale + plan of liquidation case rather than a second debt-for-equity play.*

To aid the debtors’ attempts to continue pre-petition sale efforts post-petition, certain of the RBL Lenders have committed to a $37.5mm DIP (with a 0.5-to-1 $12.5mm rollup). Pursuant to a restructuring support agreement, the RBL lenders have agreed to receive their pro rata share of any net sale proceeds and all remaining cash held by the debtors’ estates as of the plan effective date minus (i) cash needed to repay the DIP, (ii) wind down funds, and (iii) monies placed into a professional fee escrow. Royalty owners, materialman and mechanics’ lienholders will be paid in full. General unsecured claimants and equity will get wiped.

*We should note — to hammer home the point — that one of the events that hammered the debtors’ liquidity position was the RBL lenders’ April 1, 2019 redetermination down of the RBL borrowing base to $415mm. This regularly scheduled redetermination analysis created an immediate $22mm “deficiency payment” liability for the debtors as it had $437mm borrowed at the time. The debtors stopped making those payments in November 2019. They’ve been in a state of forbearance with the RBL lenders ever since.

$37.5mm DIP with $12.5 rollup

  • Jurisdiction: D. of Delaware (Judge )

  • Capital Structure:

  • Professionals:

    • Legal: Paul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison LLP (Paul Basta, Robert Britton, Sarah Harnett, Teresa Li) & Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor LLP (Pauline Morgan, Jaime Luton Chapman, Tara Pakrouh)

    • Financial Advisor: Alvarez & Marsal LLC

    • Investment Banker: Guggenheim Securities LLC (Morgan Suckow)

    • Claims Agent: KCC (*click on the link above for free docket access)

  • Other Parties in Interest:

    • DIP Agent ($37.5mm): Bank of America NA

    • Consenting RBL Lenders

      • Legal: Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLP (Amy Kyle, Andrew Gallo) & Richards Layton & Finger PA

      • Financial Advisor: RPA Advisors LLC

    • Large Class A equityholders: Ares Management LLC, Paulson & Co. Inc., Bain Capital, Lord Abbett, Archview Investment, Bank of America, Seix Advisors, Bardin Hill/Halcyon Loan Invest Management, Oppenheimer Funds

New Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Filing - PQ New York Inc. (a/k/a Le Pain Quotidien)

PQ New York Inc.

May 27, 2020

New York-based and Belgium-company-owned PQ New York Inc., otherwise known to most as Le Pain Quotidien, filed for chapter 11 bankruptcy in the District of Delaware (along with 104 affiliates) to effectuate a sale of assets to LPQ USA LLC, an affiliate of Aurify Brands. Aurify Brands incubates in-house brands (e.g., Melt Shop) and harvests previously-created brands too (e.g., Five Guys Burgers and Fries). It intends to re-open no fewer than 35 of LPQ’s 98 restaurants (and, to this end, has already filed a lease rejection motion delineating which leases, subject to a negotiation between landlords and the proposed purchaser, are subject to rejection). LPQ USA LLC provided the debtors a $522k bridge loan pre-petition and roll that loan up into a $3mm post-petition DIP credit facility to fund working capital needs during the course of the cases.

This is not a pure COVID story. The debtors financial performance began to decline pre-pandemic as customer preferences shifted away from the casual dining concept towards other concepts like “grab n go.” This trend, combined with management turnover and lack of investment at the store level, led the debtors to begin exploring strategic alternatives for their European and US-based businesses in Q3 of 2019.

Let’s put some numbers around this. In 2018, the debtors had $175mm of sales and $4.4mm in EBITDA. In 2019, sales dropped to $153mm and EBITDA swung by over $20mm to -$16.8mm. Even worse? There was no hope on the horizon. With expensive leases and eroding same store sales, the debtors forecast negative EBITDA through 2023 absent a severe operational restructuring. Prior to COVID slamming the economy and shutting everything down, the debtors had already determined that a bankruptcy filing would be necessary to help negotiate lease terms with landlords, secure funding, and pursue a sale. The shutdown just postponed things for a while.

  • Jurisdiction: D. of Delaware (Judge Dorsey)

  • Capital Structure: $522k bridge loan

  • Professionals:

    • Legal: Richards Layton & Finger PA (Mark Collins, Michael Merchant, Jason Madron, Brendan Schlauch)

    • Financial Advisor/CRO: PwC (Steven Fleming)

    • Investment Banker: SSG Advisors LLC

    • Real Estate Advisor: RCS Real Estate Advisors

    • Claims Agent: Donlin Recano & Company Inc. (*click on the link above for free docket access)

  • Other Parties in Interest:

    • Stalking Horse Purchaser: LPQ USA LLC

      • Legal: Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP (Steven Reisman, Cindi Giglio) & Klehr Harrison Harvey Branzburg LLP (Domenic Pacitti, Morton Branzburg)

🔋New Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Filing - Exide Holdings Inc.🔋

Exide Holdings Inc.

May 19, 2020

Georgia-based Exide Holdings Inc. and four affiliates (the “debtors”), among the world’s largest producers and recyclers of lead-acid batteries used in cars, boats, golf carts and more, filed for chapter 11 bankruptcy in the District of Delaware earlier this week. The filing sparked an entire industry to ask “is it a Chapter 22 or a Chapter 33?” The answer, depending upon your look-back period, is the latter. The fairer answer is probably the former and even that was 7 years ago with emergence 5 years ago (PETITION Note: the Exide Creditors’ Liquidating Trust had to make a notice of appearance in these new cases so, there’s that). Going back nearly two decades seems to be an impossible standard to hold any business to but 5-7 years seems much fairer.

Since we’re discussing labels, here’s another one: failure. Per the debtors:

Notwithstanding the Company’s efforts to implement its business plan following its emergence from the 2013 Chapter 11 Case and the support of its new owners and lenders, the Company continued to face liquidity, performance, and operational challenges that were more persistent and widespread than anticipated. Coupled with adverse industry and market factors as well as substantial environmental costs, these challenges have resulted in reduced liquidity.

Sooooo…that sucks. We admit it: we were hoping that this was a disruption story. That Elon Musk and the increasingly large cohort of lithium-ion battery using OEMs pushing out electric vehicles were putting the lead-acid battery manufacturers out to pasture. But that is not a state reason for this chapter 3…uh…chapter 2…uh, whatever the f*ck this is. Rather, the debtors state that their post-emergence liquidity issues stem from (a) mounting environmental remediation costs and litigation, (b) rising production costs (PETITION Note: because the debtors shut two recycling facilities, they are now subject to pricing pressures from outside manufacturers rather than just using their own recycled inputs), (c) operational inefficiencies caused by legacy mixed-use facilities, and (d), of course…wait for it…COVID-19. Duck for COVID-cover folks! The debtors say that the pandemic’s impact on demand for product is the cherry on top.

The debtors’ capital structure doesn’t help. Look at this beaut:

With that much funded debt, the debtors’ leverage ratio stands at 9.2x. Debt service averages approximately $26.8mm/year.

So, confronted with all of these factors, the debtors have been engaged in a marketing process since 2018. The continued deterioration of the business, however, ultimately led to a restructuring path and now the debtors intend to use the bankruptcy process to effectuate a sale of (i) the entire business or (ii) the Americas business and/or (iii) the sale of its Europe/Rest-of-World business or (iv) a liquidation (PETITION Note: the debtors fall into chapter 11 largely separated into four main business groups). The Ad Hoc Group has submitted a binding credit bid for the Europe/ROW business group which will serve as a stalking horse bid; they have also committed $15mm in DIP financing to service certain non-debtor affiliates in Europe with an additional $25mm DIP commitment for the administration of the cases coming from Blue Torch Capital LP. The debtors hope to go “effective” by the end of August: this means that everyone has a lot of work to do to try and and locate a buyer for the rest of the debtors’ businesses in the interim.

  • Jurisdiction: D. of Delaware (Judge Sontchi)

  • Capital Structure:

  • Professionals:

    • Legal: Weil Gotshal & Manges LLP (Ray Schrock, Jacqueline Marcus, Sunny Singh, Samuel Mendez, Alyssa Kutner, Jason Hufendick) & Richards Layton & Finger PA (Daniel DeFranceschi, Zachary Shapiro, Brendan Schlauch)

    • Independent Directors: Alan Carr, William Transier, Harvey Tepner, Mark Barberio

    • Financial Advisor/CRO: Ankura Consulting (Roy Messing)

    • Investment Banker: Houlihan Lokey Capital Inc.

    • Claims Agent: Prime Clerk LLC (*click on the link above for free docket access)

  • Other Parties in Interest:

    • Prepetition ABL Agent: Bank of America NA

      • Legal: Otterbourg PC (Daniel Fiorillo, David Morse, Jonathan Helfat)

    • Indenture Trustee

      • Legal: Arent Fox LLP (Andrew Silfen, Jordana Renert)

    • DIP Agent ($40mm): Blue Torch Capital LP

      • Legal: Gibson Dunn & Crutcher LLP (Robert Klyman, Matthew Bouslog, Michael Farag) & Cole Schotz PC (Norman Pernick, Patrick Reilley)

    • Ad Hoc Group

      • Legal: Paul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison LLP (Alice Belisle Eaton, Robert Britton, Eugene Park, Claudia Tobler, Jacqueline Rubin, Douglas Keeton, David Weiss, David Giller) & Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor LLP (Pauline Morgan, Sean Greecher, Andrew Magaziner, Ian Bambrick)

    • Large equityholders: Mackay Shields LLC, AllianceBernstein LLP, D.E. Shaw Galvanic Portfolios LLC, Neuberger Berman Group LLC

    • Exide Creditors’ Liquidating Trust

      • Legal: Kelley Drye & Warren LLP (Dane Kane, Konstantinos Katsionis)

💊 New Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Filing - Akorn Inc. ($AKRX) 💊

Akorn Inc.

May 20, 2020

Akorn Inc. ($AKRX), a specialty pharmaceutical company based in Illinois that develops, manufactures and markets generic and branded prescription pharmaceuticals, finally filed for chapter 11 bankruptcy.

Why “finally?” Well, back in January 2019 the company, in conjunction with an announcement of new executive and board appointments, noted that restructuring professionals (Cravath Swaine & Moore LLP, PJT Partners LP and AlixPartners LLP)* were assisting with the formulation of a business plan and discussions with stakeholders. In December 2019, the publicly-traded company acknowledged in an SEC filing that bankruptcy was on the table, sending the stock into a 33% freefall. Subsequently, in February 2020, the company announced in connection with its Q4 and annual earnings that it had reached an agreement with its lenders to execute a sale of the business “potentially using Chapter 11 protection.” A sale, however, could not generate sufficient value to cover the outstanding funded indebtedness under the company’s term loan credit agreement. Shortly thereafter in March, the company defaulted under said agreement and the company and its lenders pivoted to discussions about a credit bid with an ad hoc group of term lenders serving as stalking horse purchaser of the assets in chapter 11. Alas, here we are. The company and 16 affiliates (the “debtors”) “FINALLY” find themselves in court with recently inked asset purchase and restructuring support agreements in tow. The debtors will use the bankruptcy process to further their sale process and market test bids against the term lenders’ proposed $1.05b credit bid; they hope to have an auction in the beginning of August with a mid/late-August sale hearing.

The sale process, however, is not where the excitement is here.

We are now in an age — post COVID-19 — where M&A deals falling apart is becoming commonplace news and debates about force majeure and “material adverse effect” rage on in the news and, eventually, in the courts. In that respect, Akorn was ahead of the curve.

In April 2017, Akorn and Fresenius Kabi AG ($FSNUY), a massive German healthcare company, announced a proposed merger with Akorn shareholders set up to receive $34/share — a sizable premium to the then prevailing stock price in the high-20s. (PETITION Note: for purposes of comparison, the stock was trading at $1.26/share on the aforementioned announcement of annual earnings). Akorn shareholders approved the merger but then the business began to suffer. Per the debtors:

…Akorn began to experience a steep and sustained drop-off in financial performance drive by a variety of factors, including, among other things: consolidation of buyer power leading to price reductions; the FDA’s expedition of its review and approval process for generic drugs, leading to increased competition and resultant additional price and volume erosion; and legislative attempts to reduce drug prices.

Almost exactly a year later — after all kinds of shady-a$$ sh*t including anonymous letters alleging data integrity and regulatory deficiencies at Akron facilities and sustained poor financial performance — Fresenius was like “we out.” Lawsuits ensued with Akorn seeking to enforce the merger and Fresenius parrying with “material adverse effect” defenses. The Delaware Chancery Court agreed with Fresenius.

This is America so lawsuits beget lawsuits and Fresenius’ announcement that the merger was at risk spawned (i) federal class action litigation against Akron and certain of its present and former directors and officers and (ii) federal and state law derivative litigation. Akorn ultimately settled the class action litigation but four groups of hedge funds opted out and continue to pursue claims against Akorn. Meanwhile, Akorn lost its appeal of the Delaware Chancery Court decision and a decision on Fresenius’ claims for damages remain reserved. Fresenius has at least a $74mm claim.

This litigation overhang — coupled with the debtors’ $861.7mm in term loans (emanating out of strategic acquisitions in 2014) — is what drives this bankruptcy. The debtors believe that, upon resolution of these issues, it is well-positioned to thrive. They had $682mm revenue in ‘19 and $124mm of adjusted EBITDA. In Q1 ‘20, the company achieved adjusted EBITDA of $59mm (PETITION Note: “adjusted” being an operative word here). Large wholesale distributors like AmerisourceBergen Corporation ($ABC), Cardinal Health Inc. ($CAH), and McKesson Corporation ($MCK) are large customers. The U.S. healthcare system is shifting towards generics and big brand-name pharmaceuticals are rolling off-patent and “driving generic opportunities.” Pre-petition efforts to find a buyer who shares the debtors’ optimism, however, proved unfruitful.

Armed with a $30mm DIP commitment from certain of the term lenders in the ad hoc group, the debtors will swiftly determine whether the prospect of owning these assets “free and clear” will generate any higher or better offers.

*Kirkland & Ellis LLP, in its quest for 32,892,239% restructuring market share, ultimately displaced Cravath.

  • Jurisdiction: D. of Delaware (Judge Owens)

  • Capital Structure: $861.7mm ‘21 Term Loans (Wilmington Savings Fund Society FSB)

  • Professionals:

    • Legal: Kirkland & Ellis LLP (Patrick Nash, Nicole Greenblatt, Gregory Pesce, Christopher Hayes) & Richards Layton & Finger PA (Paul Heath, Amanda Steele, Zachary Shapiro, Brett Haywood)

    • Financial Advisor: AlixPartners LLP

    • Investment Banker: PJT Partners LP (Mark Buschmann)

    • Claims Agent: KCC (*click on the link above for free docket access)

  • Other Parties in Interest:

    • Term Loan & DIP Agent ($30mm): Wilmington Savings Fund Society FSB

      • Legal: Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP

    • Ad Hoc Group of Term Lenders

      • Legal: Gibson Dunn & Crutcher (Scott Greenberg, Steven Domanowski, Jeremy Evans, Michael J. Cohen) & Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor LLP (Robert Brady)

      • Financial Advisor: Greenhill & Co. LLC (Neil Augustine)

    • Large equityholders: Blackrock Inc., The Vanguard Group, Akorn Holdings LP, Stonehill Capital Management LLC

🚘 Special Edition: The Hertz Corporation ($HTZ) 🚘

The Hertz Corporation

May 22, 2020

Go here for our free a$$-kicking write-up about the situation.

  • Jurisdiction: D. of Delaware (Judge Walrath)

  • Professionals:

    • Legal: White & Case LLP (Thomas Lauria, Matthew Brown, J. Christopher Shore, David Turetsky, Ronald Gorsich, Aaron Colodny, Doah Kim, Jason Zakia) & Richards Layton & Finger PA (Mark Collins, John Knight, Brett Haywood)

    • Canadian Legal: McCarthy Tetrault LLP (David Galainena)

    • Financial Advisor: FTI Consulting Inc. (Michael Buenzow)

    • Investment Banker: Moelis & Co.

    • Claims Agent: Prime Clerk LLC (*click on the link above for free docket access)

  • Other Parties in Interest:

    • Barclays Bank PLC

      • Legal: Latham & Watkins LLP (George Davis, Suzzanne Uhland, Christopher Harris, Adam Goldberg, Heather Waller, Adam Ravin, Andrew Sorkin) & Morris Nichols Arsht & Tunnell LLP (Derek Abbott, Andrew Remming)

    • Indenture Trustee: Wells Fargo Bank NA

      • Legal: Foley & Lardner LLP (Mark Hebbeln, Harold Kaplan) & Dorsey & Whitney LLP (Eric Lopez Schnabel, Alessandra Glorioso)

    • Ad Hoc Group of Litigation Creditors

      • Lega: Pachulski Stang Ziehl & Jones LLP (John Fiero, Colin Robinson)

    • Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors

      • Legal: Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP (Thomas Moers Mayer, Amy Caton, Daniel Eggermann, Alice Byowitz) & Benesch Friedlander Coplan & Aronoff LLP (Jennifer Hoover, Kevin Capuzzi, John Gentile)

🚗 New Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Filing - Techniplas LLC 🚗

Techniplas LLC

May 6, 2020

Wisconsin-based Techniplas LLC and seven affiliates (the “debtors”), producers and manufacturers of plastic components used primarily in the automotive and transportation industries, filed for bankruptcy in the District of Delaware. “The Company produces, among other things, automotive products, such as fluid and air management components, decorative and personalization products, and structural components, as well as nonautomotive products, such as power utility and electrical components and water filtration products.” After cobbling together acquisitions over the course of the decade, the debtors’ business is now global in scale and its main customers are the leading OEMs in the US, Europe and Asia; it had net sales of $475mm and a net loss of $21mm in fiscal ‘19.

A bit more about the business. The debtors’ primary operating unit, “Techniplas Core,” acts “…as a manufacturer of technically complex, niche products across a wide range of applications and end markets, including the automotive and truck, industrial, and commercial markets.” This is roughly 83% of the business. In addition, the debtors have “Techniplas Prime,” which, aside from sounding like a Transformer that may or may not have it out for the human race, acts as a matchmaker between excess manufacturing capacity and customers in need of manufacturing. Per the debtors:

Serving as a nexus between customers, including OEMs, and other manufacturing companies, Techniplas Prime acts as an extension of Techniplas Core by delivering to customers the manufacturing capabilities of its Prime Partners. This makes Techniplas Prime asset-light and creates a “win-win” scenario for customers and Prime Partners.

Interestingly, this business segment was once dubbed “The Airbnb of Auto Manufacturing,” a moniker that makes almost zero sense and completely misunderstands the Airbnb model but, yeah sure, cheap “by-association” points, homies! Per Forbes:

[Founder George] Votis saw Techniplas Prime as an e-manufacturing platform from which customers could order parts electronically according to their own specifications, and have them built by local factories with unused capacity.

Except it’s not a platform. Like, at all. Airbnb is a digital two-sided platform that brings hosts and travelers together and seemlessly connects them. Techniplas Prime…well…

Screen Shot 2020-05-08 at 11.57.58 AM.png

…well…page not found. Airbnb may be struggling in this COVID environment but we can assure you that you’re not EVER getting a 404 when going to their site. Platform…pssssfft. The Forbes article later contradicts itself saying:

…they focused on 3-D printing and advanced manufacturing technology companies that had spare capacity available for contract operations, for which Techniplas Prime is essentially the broker.

Right. Being a broker is different than being a platform y’all. But we digress.

The debtors have a simple capital structure consisting of a $17.59mm ABL, $175mm in 10% ‘20 notes, and a $6.77mm interim financing agreement for total funded debt around $200mm. The debtors, primarily due to this capital structure, began pursuing strategic alternatives in early 2017. Both an attempted sale process and debt refinancing failed. Thereafter, the debtors explored in 2018 a term loan refinancing of the preptition notes and/or a public equity listing in London. Those, too, failed. For this, the debtors blame a downturn in the automotive market and uncertainty from Brexit (PETITION Note: we’ve been foreshadowing that declining production capacity by the major OEMs was going to rattle through the supply chain so nobody should be surprised by this revelation).

In mid-’19, an attempted sale to a strategic buyer, private equity firm The Jordan Company, kicked off but that, despite some forward-moving progress involving a note purchase agreement and an unexercised call option for 100% of the membership interests in the debtors, ultimately fell through due to the inability to refi out the pre-petition notes. Subsequent attempts — now involving ad hoc group of noteholders and Jordan — also came close but ultimately failed due to deteriorating operating performance that pre-dated OOVID. COVID merely exacerbated things. Per the debtors:

Many customers suspended or drastically reduced production, resulting in a swift drop in demand for the Debtors’ products. Additionally, many of the locations where the Company had offices and manufacturing plants worldwide issued lockdown orders and permitted only essential business to remain open in an effort to control the outbreak and protect the health and safety of the public.

All of this was too much to handle: Jordan peaced out. Liquidity increasingly became an issue and so the debtors obtained a $6.7mm super senior priority bridge financing from the ad hoc group. Indeed, the ad hoc group is stepping up big here: in addition to providing the liquidity the debtors needed to get in chapter 11, they’ve agreed to provide a DIP ($20-25mm new money with a $100mm roll-up) and serve as stalking horse bidder — offering $105mm to purchase the debtors’ international operations and three remaining US-based manufacturing facilities. The debtors hope to close the sale within 44 days of the petition date.

  • Jurisdiction: D. of Delaware (Judge Silverstein)

  • Capital Structure: See above.

  • Professionals:

    • Legal: White & Case LLP (David Turetsky, Andrew Zatz, Fan He, Robbie Boone Jr., John Ramirez, Sam Lawand, Thomas MacWright) & Fox Rothschild LLP (Jeffrey Schlerf, Carl Neff, Johnna Darby, Daniel Thompson)

    • Financial Advisor/CRO: FTI Consulting Inc. (Peter Smidt, Andrew Hinkelman)

    • Investment Banker: Miller Buckfire & Co. LLC (Richard Klein)

    • Claims Agent: Epiq Corporate Restructuring LLC (*click on the link above for free docket access)

  • Other Parties in Interest:

    • Stalking Horse Purchaser: Techniplas Acquisition Co. LLC

    • Pre-Petition ABL & DIP ABL Agent: Bank of America NA

      • Legal: Sidley Austin LLP (Dennis Twomey, Elliot Bromagen) & Richards Layton & Finger PA (Mark Collins, Amanda Steele, David Queroli)

    • DIP Term Agent: Wilmington Savings Fund Society FSB

      • Legal: Cole Schotz PC (Daniel Geoghan, J. Kate Stickles, Patrick Reilley)

    • Indenture Trustee: US Bank NA

      • Legal: Dorsey & Whitney LLP (Eric Lopez Schnabel, Alessandra Glorioso)

    • Ad Hoc Noteholder Group ‘20 10% Senior Secured Notes

      • Legal: Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP (Jonathan Levine, Brian Lohan, Jeffrey Fuisz, Gerardo Mijares-Shafai)

🚗New Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Filing - Pace Industries LLC🚗

Pace Industries LLC

April 12, 2020

Arkansas-based Pace Industries LLC and ten affiliates (the “debtors”) — fully-integrated suppliers and manufacturers of aluminum, zinc, and magnesium die cast and finished products in service of several industries (auto, powersports, lawn & garden, lighting & electric, appliances & industrial motors etc.) — filed fully-accepted prepackaged chapter 11 bankruptcy cases in the District of Delaware over the holiday weekend. The plan features one impaired class which voted 100% to equitize pre-petition debt.

A quick digression before we delve into what happened here. COVID-19 provides the ultimate cover for any and all businesses that file for chapter 11 over the next several months. You’re going to see all kinds of companies “clean out the junk” over earnings reports. It will be important, therefore, to parse through company messaging to determine whether they’re just massaging matters or whether, on the other hand, there were fundamental problems confronting the business prior to COVID-19 rearing its ugly head and shutting down the US economy. Where a company discloses that problems existed prior to March, there is absolutely no reason NOT to believe them. So it’s important that the collective we — newsletters writers, journalists, the twitterverse — get things right when talking about the carnage created by COVID-19.

And this case is only partially a COVID-19 story. Given the rush to sensationalize headlines and tweets, this is something we now feel compelled to note with each new bankruptcy filing. While the debtors, like everyone else, have been affected by the virus, it was not the catalyst to the debtors’ filing. The debtors have been seeking new capital sources since the summer of 2018; they initially sought an equity investment but when that couldn’t get done, the debtors shifted towards a sale and marketing process. Any and all initial interest in the debtors’ assets dissipated, however, when the debtors suffered from a poor Q4 ‘19. Interestingly, the disappointing performance was attributable to lower demand in the lighting, BBQ grill and appliance markets. To make matters worse, General Motors Inc’s ($GM) employees went on strike further compressing decreasing automobile production volumes. Moreover, the company self-inflicted some wounds: production inefficiencies relating to new products also hurt performance. Bankruptcy lawyers and advisors were hired in January — long before COVID stormed through and complicated matters further.

The debtors solicited their plan prior to their filing making this a true prepackaged plan. In other words, old school. None of this new solicitation technology; no straddle stuff. The only impaired class, the pre-petition noteholders, voted to accept the plan pursuant to which they would swap $232.1mm in notes for (i) equity in a reorganized LLC (subject to dilution from a management incentive plan AND warrants issued to the debtors’ post-petition DIP term loan lenders) and (ii) take-back term loan paper. This means the new owners will be TCW and Cerberus.

The cases feature a roll-up DIP ABL (which will ultimately be refi’d out through an exit facility) and a post-petition DIP term loan that will be refi’d out via a new term loan exit facility. The aforementioned warrants could amount to 51% of the new post-reorg equity.

This should be a quick case. The DIP terminates in 90 days from the petition date. Given that acceptance was 100% and that general unsecured creditors will be paid in full, this case should, absent other crazy externalities, be in and out of bankruptcy relatively quickly.

  • Jurisdiction: D. of Delaware (Judge )

  • Capital Structure: $92.1mm ABL, $232.1mm pre-petition notes

  • Professionals:

    • Legal: Willkie Farr & Gallagher LLP (Matthew Feldman, Rachel Strickland, Debra Sinclair, Melany Cruz Burgos) & Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor LLP (Robert Brady, Edmon Morton, Joseph Mulvihill)

    • Financial Advisor/CRO: FTI Consulting Inc. (Patrick Flynn, Johnathan Miller)

    • Claims Agent: KCC (*click on the link above for free docket access)

  • Other Parties in Interest:

    • DIP Revolver Agent ($125mm): Bank of Montreal

      • Legal: McGuireWoods LLP (Wade Kennedy, Alexandra Shipley, Brian Swett) & Richards Layton & Finger PA (John Knight, Amanda Steele, David Queroli)

    • DIP Term Agent ($50mm): TCW Asset Management Company LLC

      • Legal: Schule Roth & Zabel LLP (Adam Harris, Kelly Knight) & Landis Rath & Cobb LLP (Adam Landis)

⚫️New Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Filing - Longview Power LLC⚫️

Longview Power LLC

April 14, 2020

First it was True Religion and now it’s West Virginia-based Longview Power LLC: looks like we’re back to Chapter 22-ville after a long time away. This prepackaged chapter 11 also brings us back to (“clean”) coal country.* #MAGA!! Longview is the owner and operator of coal-filed power generation facility in West Virginia that services the PJM region (P - Pennsylvania, J - Jersey, M - Maryland, among other states). The company generated $28.1mm of EBITDA in 2019 versus $355mm of funded debt. You can do the math on what that means in terms of leverage ratios. 😬

The company attributes the drag on EBITDA to a combination of “…the rapid expansion of natural gas production, the use of natural gas in electric power generation in recent years, and lower energy prices due to a series of unseasonably warm winters has decreased energy price.” Colder winters = higher demand. Damn global warming! The average price per megawatt for electricity sold in the region is less than that of 2018 ($17.65/mwh). Other factors hitting the demand side include proliferation of use of LED light bulbs and solar roofs. Disruption! Given these market challenges, the company turned its attention to its balance sheet with the hope of eliminating interest expense and freeing up liquidity.

Alas, this is a balance sheet restructuring. The capital structure — while arguably not de-levered meaningfully enough after the initial chapter 11 cut $675mm — is at least straight-forward and simple. Longview has a $25mm revolver, $286.5mm term loan B facility and $44.3mm in subordinated notes. The company’s lenders from the 2013 bankruptcy own the equity.

Well, it looks like this will be Groundhog Day for Longview. Certain of the pre-petition term lenders will backstop a $40mm exit term loan and will get 10% of the new common equity with warrants exercisable for 90% of the new common equity provided the lender participates in the exit facility. Another debt for equity swap. Second time’s the charm?

*The company has already built one clean coal facility with an eye towards a second facility. The company also has plans for natural-gas-fired combined cycle plants and solar panel complexes.

  • Jurisdiction: D. of Delaware (Judge Shannon)

  • Capital Structure: $25mm RCF, $286.5mm TL (Deutsche Bank Trust Company), $44.3mm subordinated notes

  • Professionals:

    • Legal: Kirkland & Ellis LLP (David Seligman, Joseph Graham, Laura Krucks, Brenton Rogers, Stephen Hackney) & Richards Layton & Finger PA (Daniel DeFranceschi, Zachary Shapiro)

    • Financial Advisor: 3Cubed Advisory Services LLC

    • Investment Banker: Houlihan Lokey Inc.

    • Claims Agent: Donlin Recano & Co. (*click on the link above for free docket access)

  • Other Parties in Interest:

    • Ad Hoc Group of Prepetition Term Lenders

      • Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP (Kaitlin MacKenzie, James Millar, Laura Appleby, Kyle Kistinger)

New Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Filing - RentPath Holdings Inc.

RentPath Holdings Inc.

February 12, 2020

RentPath Holdings Inc. and eleven affiliated entities (the “debtors”), a digital marketing solutions enterprise that links property managers with prospective renters to simplify the residential rental experience, filed for bankruptcy in the District of Delaware. The business did $226.7mm of revenue in fiscal 2019 and had EBITDA of $46.8mm.

Where there’s money there’s competition. Where there’s competition, revenue maintenance becomes more challenging. And because of that competition, the debtors were forced to up their marketing spend and promotional activity which dented liquidity. A lack of liquidity presents some really big problems when your annual interest expense is $54.4mm on approximately $700mm of funded debt. For the math challenged, $46.8mm against approximately $700mm of funded debt means that this sucker has a leverage ratio of approximately 15. Or as President Trump would say, “It’s UUUUUUUUUUUGE.” Clearly that is unsustainable AF.

The good news is that the debtors have found themselves a potential buyer, CSGP Holdings LLC, an affiliate of CoStar Group Inc. ($CSGP), which has come forward with a $587.5mm cash bid (plus the assumption of certain liabilities) for the debtors’ assets. The debtors hope to consummate the sale pursuant to a plan of reorganization. To get there and fund the cases in the interim, the debtors obtained a fully-backstopped commitment of $74.1mm in DIP financing from certain members of the crossholder ad hoc committee and other first lien lenders.

  • Jurisdiction: (Judge Shannon)

  • Capital Structure: $37.95mm First Lien Revolving Facility, $479.75mm First Lien Term Loan, $170mm Second Lien Term Loan

  • Professionals:

    • Legal: Weil Gotshal & Manges LLP (Ray Schrock, David Griffiths, Andriana Georgallas, Gaby Smith, Alexander Cohen, Kyle Satterfield, Justin Pitcher, Leslie Liberman, Martha Martir, Richard Slack, Amanda Burns Shulak) & Richards Layton & Finger PA (Daniel DeFrancheschi, Zachary Shapiro)

    • Independent Director: Marc Beilinson, Dhiren Fonseca

    • Financial Advisor: Berkeley Research Group LLC

    • Investment Banker: Moelis & Company (Zul Jamal)

    • Claims Agent: Prime Clerk LLC (*click on the link above for free docket access)

  • Other Parties in Interest:

    • DIP Agent & First Lien Agent:

      • Legal: Paul Hastings LLP (Michael Baker, Shekhar Kumar)

    • Successor Second Lien Agent: Wilmington Savings Fund Society FSB

      • Legal: Pryor Cashman LLP (Seth Lieberman, Patrick Sibley, Marie Polito Hofsdal) & Ashby & Geddes PA (William Bowden, Gregory Taylor)

    • Crossholder Ad Hoc Committee

      • Legal: Milbank LLP (Evan Fleck, Nelly Almeida, Andrew Harmeyer) & Morris Nichols Arsht & Tunnell LLP (Robert Dehney, Joseph Barsalona)

    • Second Lien Ad Hoc Committee

      • Legal: Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP (Philip Dublin, Rachel Biblo Block) & Morris Nichols Arsht & Tunnell LLP (Robert Dehney, Joseph Barsalona)

    • Stalking Horse Purchaser: CSGP Holdings LLC (CoStar Group Inc.)

      • Legal: Jones Day (Daniel Moss, Nicholas Morin) & Potter Anderson & Corroon LLP (Jeremy Ryan, R. Stephen McNeill)

    • Large Equityholders: Providence Equity & TPG

      • Legal: Vinson & Elkins LLP (David Meyer)

🍎New Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Filing - Lucky's Market Parent Company LLC🍎

Lucky's Market Parent Company LLC

January 27, 2020

In Sunday’s Members’-only a$$-kicking briefing entitled “🔥Like No Other Newsletter🔥,” we took a deeeeeeeeep dive into the Fairway Group Holdings Corp. chapter 11 bankruptcy filing. We relegated to a mere footnote, the following:

*Two more local grocers to watch out for: Lucky’s Market (not PE-backed) and Earthfare (PE-backed). The former announced, on the heals of losing its sponsorship from Kroger Inc., that it would close 32 of 39 stores. The latter is quietly shuttering stores (e.g., Gainesville and Indianapolis). This is telling:

“Stern said Lucky's could potentially be acquired, but he said logical choices like Sprouts Farmers Market and The Fresh Market are also retrenching and not in expansion mode right now.”

The pain in grocery is pervasive.

Lucky’s Market Parent Company LLC be like:

Dirty Dancing.gif

And so the Colorado-based company and 21 affiliated entities filed for chapter 11 bankruptcy in the District of Delaware. Because, like, f*ck it: the pain in grocery IS pervasive so it might as well become a chapter 11 debtor like everyone else.

This one swims upstream. The debtors focus on affordable organic and locally-grown produce, naturally raised meats and seafood, and fresh daily prepared foods. Which, we thought, was supposed to be all the rage. “Organic for the 99%” was their mission. They even have private label goods. AND they have a millennial-pleasing “giving” element to their business: 10% of profits from private label sales are reinvested into the local communities they service. They have no unions. And they’re not even private equity owned!! Kroger Inc. ($KR) is the debtors’ secured lender and largest equity holder and, while obviously not PE bros, it seems that maybe(?) Kroger pushed the Colorado-based founders to grow too fast too soon?? In the midst of a number of grocery bankruptcies. In April 2016, they had 17 stores. The Kroger transaction took place at that time and then — BOOM! — a private equity growth mentality appears to have mysteriously overtaken the debtors. By the end of that year, the debtors’ footprint was up to 20 stores; by the end of 2017, it was 26 stores; 33 stores by the end of 2018; and 39 stores by the end of 2019. Florida was a primary focus.

The timing was pretty bad. Per the debtors:

…the Company’s expansion in Florida coincided with, among other things, increased competition in the grocery industry, including expansions from competing chains such as Sprouts Farmers Market, Fresh Thyme Farmers Market and Earth Fare. As a result, notwithstanding the growth in sales, the portfolio of Company stores was unable to achieve sustainable four-wall profitability.

Note the mention of Earth Fare ⬆️. Get ready for Dirty Dancing 2: Havana Nights gifs, people.

There’s more:

Most recently, fiscal year-to-date through January 4, 2020, the Company had approximately $22 million of store operating losses and approximately $100 million net loss. Additionally, fiscal year-to-date through the week ended January 18, 2020, the Company had a 10.6% reduction in comparable store sales versus the prior year-to-date period.

Suffice it to say, that growth strategy diiiiiiiidn’t work out so well.

Captain Obvious.gif

And so now it’s all being unwound. The debtors began winding down 32 of their 39 stores pre-petition and, obviously, terminated plans for 19 leased but unopened locations.

Screen Shot 2020-01-27 at 7.48.03 PM.png

Absent closure, the debtors note, they’d be on the hook for $30mm in operating losses for fiscal year ‘20. Now they’re selling furniture, fixtures and equipment from, and transferring leases of, 26 stores to third-party purchasers. They have an asset purchase agreement with Aldi for six FL locations while they continue to operate 7 locations while the marketing process progresses.

The debtors will use Kroger’s cash collateral to fund these cases.

  • Jurisdiction: (Judge Dorsey)

  • Capital Structure: $301.1mm secured loan (Kroger Inc.), $5.9mm New Markets Tax Credit Loan (BBIF Subsidiary CDE 3 LLC, guaranteed by Kroger Inc.)

  • Professionals:

    • Legal: Polsinelli PC (Christopher Ward, Liz Boydston, Caryn Wang)

    • Financial Advisor: Alvarez & Marsal LLC

    • Investment Banker: Peter J. Solomon

    • Liquidation Consultant: Great American Global Partners LLC

    • Claims Agent: Omni Agent Solutions (*click on the link above for free docket access)

    • Independent Director: William Transier

  • Other Parties in Interest:

    • Large Equityholder (55%): Kroger Inc.

      • Legal: Weil Gotshal & Manges LLP (Garrett Fail, Moshe Fink) and Richards Layton & Finger PA (Zachary Shapiro, Brett Haywood)

😷New Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Filing - REVA Medical Inc.😷

REVA Medical Inc.

January 14, 2020

Take cover folks: it’s raining med device bankruptcies these days.

San Diego-based REVA Medical Inc. develops bioresorbable polymer technologies for coronary artery disease, peripheral artery disease and embolization therapy. If that sounds technical, you’re right: just like every other med device company that finds its way into bankruptcy. The details of the products go right over our heads but, fortunately, the general themes are the same as far less technical debtors. In a nutshell: the company’s products are highly capital intensive and require access to equity and debt markets.

And, indeed, REVA has accessed those markets. It was publicly-traded on an Australian exchange; it also raised tens of millions ($56.8mm to be exact) by way of convertible notes; and, finally, it had access to a senior secured credit facility that looks like a whole lot like bridge financing to a bankruptcy. Indeed, on January 9, just four days prior to filing, the debtor’s gained access to an additional $4.4mm from Goldman Sachs Specialty Lending Group, L.P. which perfectly teed up a cash collateral motion (which was granted the next day). With all of that debt and “relatively minimal sales,” the debtor “has not yet generated revenue at a level sufficient to support its cost structure.” (PETITION Note: we really hope that forthcoming med device AND biopharma debtors borrow this language because it’s likely universally applicable…they can save themselves the cost of 0.2 billable hours). Compounding matters was the maturity of its first issuance of converts, putting the debtor on the hook for $25.5mm. Ruh roh.

The debtor ran into other issues. For one, the debtor’s distributor, Abbott Laboratories ($ABT), withdrew one of the debtor’s products from the market (“Absorb”) after adverse events and poor clinical trial results. Score one for ethics! Thereafter, the European Society of Cardiology published new guidelines that basically napalmed the debtor’s Absorb saying that it’s not useful/effective and might actually be harmful. Whoops!

But there’s some good news here. The debtor has a deal. The deal will erase $90mm of debt with the senior secured lenders and the holders of convertible notes receiving new equity in the reorganized (read: post-bankruptcy) company. This product will live to see another day with the hope of a major course correction.

  • Jurisdiction: D. of Delaware (Judge Dorsey)

  • Capital Structure: $9.7mm senior secured credit facility (Goldman Sachs International), $25mm '14 7.54% convertible notes (matured 11/14/19)(Goldman Sachs International, Senrigan Capital Group), $47.1mm ‘17 8% convertible notes (GSI, Senrigan, Medtronic, Inc., HEC Master Fund LP, J.P. Morgan Securities plc, TIGA Trading Pty Ltd, and Saints Capital Everest LP)

  • Professionals:

    • Legal: DLA Piper LLP (Thomas Califano, Stuart Brown, Jamila Willis)

    • Financial Advisor: Ernst & Young LLP

    • Claims Agent: Stretto (*click on the link above for free docket access)

  • Other Parties in Interest:

    • 5%+ Equityholders: Senrigan Capital Group, Goldman Sachs International, Robert Stockman, Elliott Associates, L.P, Brookside/Bain, Capital Public Equity, Cerberus Capital Management, JP Morgan, Citicorp Nominees PTY Limited, JP Morgan Nominees Australia Pty Limited, HSBC Custody Nominees (Australia) Limited –GSCO, HSBC Custody Nominees (Australia) Limited

    • Senior Secured Agent: Goldman Sachs International

      • Legal: Weil Gotshal & Manges LLP (David Griffiths, Kevin Bostel) & Richards Layton & Finger PA (Paul Heath, Zachary Shapiro, Sarah Silveira)

    • Senior Secured Lenders: MS Pace LP, Senrigan Capital Group Limited

    • Elliott Management Corporation

      • Legal: Debevoise & Plimpton LLP (Jasmine Ball) & Ashby & Geddes PA (William Bowden)

New Chapter 11 Filing - Paddock Enterprises LLC

Paddock Enterprises LLC

January 6, 2020

Ohio-based Paddock Enterprises LLC (aka Owens-Illinois Inc.) is the latest victim of asbestos-related liabilities to find itself in bankruptcy court. And by “latest” we mean the first in, like, a few days. Just last week, another Ohio-based manufacturer, ON Marine Services Company LLC, filed for bankruptcy after having had enough of dealing with decades-worth of claims within the tort system. ON filed for bankruptcy to address 6,000 claims emanating out of the 70s; Paddock filed for bankruptcy because its alternative to the tort system — “administrative claims agreements” — became increasingly untenable and it must still address 900 claims stemming from the 40s and 50s. That’s right, the 40s and 50s!! The purpose of filing for bankruptcy is to establish a 524(g) trust to deal with current and future asbestos claimants.

This case seems rather straight-forward and so we’ll spare you the long summary. In a nutshell, if a company at one time manufactured product with asbestos, it is generally f*cked. But there is an interesting commentary herein about these types of lawsuits and why bankruptcy is warranted. In the context of discussing its reserve coverage of asbestos-related tort expenditures ($722mm!), the company notes:

The Debtor believes that, although the established reserves are appropriate under ASC 450, its ultimate asbestos-related tort expenditures cannot be known with certainty because, among other reasons, the litigation environment in the tort system has deteriorated generally for mass tort defendants and Administrative Claims Agreements are becoming less reliable.

It gets better (PETITION Note: this is a long but worth-it passage):

What is certain is the incredible disparity between what the Debtor has historically paid, and is now being asked to pay, for Asbestos Claims, given the extent of its historical asbestosrelated operations. As of September 30, 2019, the Debtor had disposed of over 400,000 Asbestos Claims, and had incurred gross expense of approximately $5 billion for asbestos-related costs. In contrast, its total Kaylo sales for the 10-year period in which it sold the product were approximately $40 million. Asbestos-related cash payments for 2018, 2017, and 2016 alone were $105 million, $110 million, and $125 million, respectively. Although these cash payments show a modest decline, the overall volume and claimed value of Asbestos Claims asserted against the Debtor has not declined in proportion to the facts that (i) over 60 years have passed since the Debtor exited the Kaylo business, (ii) the average age of the vast majority of its claimants is now over 83 years old, (iii) these demographics produce increasingly limited opportunities to demonstrate legitimate occupational Kaylo exposures, and (iv) other recoveries are available from trusts established by other asbestos defendants. Rather, increasing settlement values have been demanded of the Debtor. And because the Debtor has settled or otherwise exhausted all insurance that might cover Asbestos Claims, it must satisfy all asbestos-related expenses out of Company cash flows.

Oh man. You’ve gotta love the plaintiff’s Bar. Those numbers are staggering. $40mm in 1940-1950 dollars would be equal to approximately $565mm in 2018 dollars. As compared to $5b in liability. And more to come. SHEEEESH. (PETITION Note: none of the foregoing is intended to disrespect any of the victims of the debtor’s product. Yes, we feel obligated to say that.)

There’s also a structural issue: the debtor entity subject to these extensive liabilities was incorporated in December 2019 as a direct wholly-owned subsidiary of O-I Glass Inc. ($OI), a $2b market cap glass container manufacturer. This is the classic “good company,” “bad company” structural separation. We suspect there’ll be at least some fireworks in bankruptcy court over this structure as creditors — almost exclusively the plaintiffs’ law firms — try to broaden the pool of potential proceeds from which they can recover monies for their clients.

  • Jurisdiction: D. of Delaware (Judge Silverstein)

  • Capital Structure:

  • Professionals:

    • Legal: Latham & Watkins LLP (George Davis, Jeffrey Bjork, Christina Craige, Jeffrey Mispagel, Helena Tseregounis, Michael Faris, Lisa Lansio) & Richards Layton & Finger PA (John Knight, Michael Merchant)

    • Board of Directors: Kevin Collins, John Reynolds, Scott Gedris

    • Estimation Agent: Bates White LLC

    • Financial Advisor: Alvarez & Marsal LLC

    • Claims Agent: Prime Clerk LLC (*click on the link above for free docket access)

  • Other Parties in Interest:

    • O-I Glass Inc.

      • Legal: Morris Nichols Arsht & Tunnell LLP (Derek Abbott, Joseph Halsey)

    • Future Claims Representative: James Patton Jr.

      • Legal: Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor LLP

      • Claims Analyst: Ankura Consulting Group LLC

🐟New Chapter 11 Bankruptcy & CCAA Filing - Bumble Bee Parent Inc.🐟

Bumble Bee Parent Inc.

November 21, 2019

Tuna fish went from playing a role in the founding of one of the world’s largest private equity firms (Blackstone) to, in the case of Bumble Bee Parent Inc. and its affiliated debtors, another private-equity-backed (Lion Capital LLP) bankruptcy. Bumble Bee is the company behind “shelf-stable seafood” brands Bumble Bee, Brunswick, Sweet Sue, Snow’s Beach Cliff and Wild Selections (as well as a Canadian brand). It has been on a wild ride since 2017.

The bankruptcy narrative is that a plea agreement with the United States Department of Justice related to criminal charges of alleged price-fixing led to burdensome financial obligations by way of (a) a $25mm criminal fine) and (b) defense costs associated with an onslaught of subsequent civil lawsuits from direct and indirect purchasers of products claiming damages arising out of the alleged price-fixing. This overhang ultimately led to the debtors arriving at, but not quite tripping, an event of default with their term lenders in Q4 ‘18. The debtors have been operating under a series of short-term limited waivers ever since as they sought to explore strategic alternatives.

They have one. The debtors have a stalking horse purchase agreement with affiliates of FCF Co. Ltd.for the sale of substantially all of the Company’s assets at a total implied enterprise value of up to $930.6 million, comprised of $275 million of cash, assumption of the remaining $17 million of the DOJ Fine, and the roll-over of up to $638.6 million in outstanding term loan indebtedness.” This sale will preserve the business as a going concern, preserve jobs, and provide an ongoing business partner to vendors and customers who consider the debtors to be partners.

Debtor first day bankruptcy papers are typically replete with spin and these papers are no different. In fact, necessarily so, they read like an offering memorandum. The papers discuss how the debtors provide “nutricious foods” that are “well-positioned to address a number of important consumer preferences and food trends, including shifts toward protein-rich, low-fat/low-calorie, and high Omega-3 fatty acid diets and trends towards eating multiple small or ‘snack-sized’ portions per day rather than the traditional three-square meals per day, and an overall increase in ‘snacking.’” They have the #1 or #2 market share in the shelf-stable seafood category and 41% of the US share of sales of canned albacore tuna. They also hold “approximately 13% of the U.S. share of sales of canned “light meat” tuna, approximately 12% of the share of sales in tuna pouches, approximately 71% of the U.S. share of sales in ready-to-eat tuna meals, approximately 40% of the U.S. share of sales in sardines, and approximately 16% of the U.S. share of sales in salmon.” It helps that they’re sold at virtually every major bigbox retailer, wholesale club, and grocery store. In 2018, the company had net sales of approximately $933m and adjusted EBITDA of $112.3m and the debtors’ U.S.-based operations contributed $722.2m of net sales and adjusted EBITDA of $86.3m. This is big business.

Putting aside its recent brush with the law, it also faces big market challenges. Questions persist about the safety and viability of shelf-stable seafood, particularly tuna. Indeed, there are headwinds. One sign of this may be that the Company’s overall Adjusted EBITDA has declined by approximately 20% from 2015 to 2018. We assume that, here, the EBITDA is adjusted to ex-out litigation costs.

And then there is this bonkers Wall Street Journal piece noting that consumption of canned tuna has fallen steadily compared with fresh and frozen fish. “Per capita consumption of canned tuna has dropped 42% in the three decades through 2016, according to the latest data available from the U.S. Department of Agriculture. And the downturn has continued, with sales of the fish slumping 4% by volume from 2013 to October 2018, data from market-research firm IRI show.


This bit is off the charts: “In a country focused on convenience, canned tuna isn’t cutting it with consumers. Many can’t be bothered to open and drain the cans, or fetch utensils and dishes to eat the tuna. “A lot of millennials don’t even own can openers,” said Andy Mecs, vice president of marketing and innovation for Pittsburgh-based StarKist, a subsidiary of South Korea’s Dongwon Group.” To address this trend, the debtors have made forays into the fresh fish category. Otherwise, these challenges will play out another day. With a different owner.

A few more bankruptcy-specific points:

  1. The debtors prevailed over a fee objection by the United States Trustee relating to interim access to $40mm of a proposed $80mm DIP term loan facility and immediate access to a $200mm DIP ABL. It seems that Weil Gotshal & Manges LLP, as counsel to DIP term lender Brookfield Principal Credit LLC had to give the UST a lesson in reverse-Seinfeld Logic. With lending, it is about “taking the reservation” rather than holding or using the reservation: once a debtor obtains a commitment to funds, those funds are committed and technically cannot be allocated elsewhere. The lenders argue, therefore, that fees are warranted upfront.

  2. Critical vendor motions can sometimes be controversial because, naturally, everyone wants to jump the line with critical vendor designation. To get it, however, pursuant to standards set many many years ago, there’s a multi-prong test that must be satisfied. In a nutshell, the critical vendor payments are needed to prevent disruption of a debtors’ business, among other things. Here, the buyer, FCF Co Ltd., seeks critical vendor status to the tune of $51mm (out of a $77mm critical vendor ask). Some other creditors were like “Mmmmmm???” and insisted that the Judge postpone any interim payments until an official committee of unsecured creditors could be appointed. Despite protests from FCF’s counsel, Weil for the DIP lender, and the debtors, Judge Silverstein declined to rule on the motion at the hearing, highlighting the unusual nature of a prospective buyer seeking status. If they want the business, will they really walk away?

Despite these first day fireworks, this should be a relatively smooth one.

One last question it poses is this: will this be just the first of a clump of tuna-related bankruptcies? 🤔

  • Jurisdiction: D. of Delaware (Judge Silverstein)

  • Capital Structure: see below.

  • Professionals:

    • Legal: Paul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison LLP (Alan Kornberg, Kelly Cornish, Claudia Tobler, Christopher Hopkins, Rich Ramirez, Aidan Synnot) & (local) Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor LLP (Pauline Morgan, Ryan Bartley, Ashley Jacobs, Elizabeth Justison, Jared Kochenash)

    • Board of Directors: Scott Vogel, Steve Panagos

    • Financial Advisor: AlixPartners LLP

    • Investment Banker: Houlihan Lokey Inc.

    • Claims Agent: Prime Clerk LLC (*click on the link above for free docket access)

  • Other Parties in Interest:

    • ABL Agent & DIP Agent: Wells Fargo Capital Finance LLC

      • Legal: Paul Hastings LLP (Andrew Tenzer, Michael Comerford, Peter Burke) & Womble Bond Dickinson US LLP (Matthew Ward, Morgan Patterson)

    • Term Loan Agent & Term Loan DIP Agent: Brookfield Principal Credit LLC

      • Legal: Weil Gotshal & Manges LLP (Matthew Barr, David Griffiths, Debora Hoehne, Yehudah Buchweitz) & Richards Layton & Finger PA (Paul Heath, Zachary Shapiro, Brendan Schlauch)

Screen Shot 2019-11-23 at 10.51.43 AM.png

⛽️New Chapter 11 Filing - Arsenal Resources Development LLC⛽️

Screen Shot 2019-11-08 at 2.12.19 PM.png

An “array of resources available for a certain purpose” connotes something positive — an advantage to the party in possession of the resources. Of the arsenal. Bankruptcy sure loves to flip things on their head. We’re looking at you Arsenal Resources Development LLC.

Arsenal Resources Development LLC and 16 affiliated companies filed for bankruptcy in the District of Delaware on Friday. This marked the second prepackaged chapter 11 filing for entities affiliated with the Arsenal enterprise in less than 12 months. In February, Arsenal Energy Holdings LLC, a holding company, filed a 9-day prepackaged bankruptcy to effectuate a debt-for-equity swap of $861mm of subordinated notes. We wrote at the time:

Pursuant to its prepackaged plan of reorganization, the company will convert its subordinated notes to Class A equity. Holders of 95.93% of the notes approved of the plan. The one holdout — the other 4+% — precipitated the need for a chapter 11 filing. Restructuring democracy is a beautiful (and sometimes wasteful) thing.

And:

The company, itself, is about as boring a bankruptcy filer as they come: it is just a holding company with no ops, no employees and, other than a single bank account and its direct and indirect equity interests in certain non-debtor subs, no assets. The equity is privately-held.

More of the action occurred out-of-court upon the recapitalization of the non-debtor operating company. Because of the holdout(s), the company, its noteholders, the opco lenders (Mercuria) and the consenting equityholders agreed to consummate a global transaction in steps: first, the out-of-court recap of the non-debtor opco and then the in-court restructuring of the holdco to squeeze the holdouts. For the uninitiated, a lower voting threshold passes muster in-court than it does out-of-court. Out-of-court, the debtor needed 100% consent. Not so much in BK. (emphasis added).

Critically, the February restructuring did not successfully amend any of the company’s gathering agreements. Trade creditors were unimpaired and unaffected (economically).

With this bankruptcy filing, the operating companies are now in chapter 11. Which makes statements like these…

…technically incorrect. This isn’t a Chapter 22 per se. This isn’t even what we’d dub going forward, a Crapter 22-12 (two bankruptcy filings in 12 months a la Hercules Offshore Inc., another misleadingly-strong-named-failure-of-an-enterprise) or the “Two-Year Rule” violating Crapter 22-24 (two bankruptcy filings in 24 months a la Gymboree).* This is actually David’s Bridal in reverse: an out-of-court restructuring quickly followed in short order by an in-court restructuring. This is, technically, a “reverse Chapter 11.5.” We know…this is getting to be a bit much, but work with us here, folks: when the restructuring process becomes this much of a joke, jokester labels apply.

Founded in 2011, Arsenal is an independent exploration and production company that acquires and develops “unconventional” nat gas resources in the Appalachian Basin; it has 177k acres in the Marcellus Shale. The company is headquartered in Pennsylvania but its primary acreage and horizontal wells exist in West Virginia. The company had $120.1mm of revenue in ‘18 and appears on track to more or less match that in ‘19 ($59.3mm through June’s end, so, okay, maybe “less”).

In its latest Disclosure Statement, the company has the cajones to spitball the following:

“The Company creates value by leveraging its technical expertise and local knowledge to assemble a portfolio of concentrated, high-quality drilling locations, develop its acreage position safely and efficiently and install midstream infrastructure to support its upstream activities.”

Except, all we see here — across two recapitalization transactions in less than 12 months — is value destruction across the enterprise.** To be fair, the natural gas price environment has been far from accommodating over the last year. It is primarily for that reason — and a still too-levered balance sheet — that the company is in bankruptcy. This is telling:

…following the Prior Plan Effective Date, the E&P industry’s declining trend continued through fiscal year 2019, as exhibited by the following chart, depicting a natural gas futures-strip priced on the Prior Plan Effective Date compared against the same strip priced on October 22, 2019. As shown in the chart, since the Prior Plan Effective Date, realized gas prices have been on average 8.1% below futures strip (and the forward looking October 22, 2019 strip is on average 8.6% lower today than February 14, 2019 strip). Indeed, since the Prior Plan Effective Date, through September 30, 2019, 31 E&P companies have filed for chapter 11 protection. This represents a significant increase compared to the 22 E&P companies that filed for chapter 11 during the first 9 months of 2018.

Screen Shot 2019-11-09 at 1.53.37 PM.png

Compounding matters is the balance sheet:

Screen Shot 2019-11-09 at 1.58.43 PM.png

The new plan, which has been agreed upon by all three of the major constituencies party to the capital structure, will:

  • provide the Debtors with access to $90mm in DIP credit from Citibank NA, the debtors’ prepetition RBL Lenders and, upon confirmation and emergence from bankruptcy, a $130mm exit facility;

  • convert the term loan and seller notes into 100% of the equity in the reorganized debtors (subject to dilution) from a $100mm equity infusion from lenders Chambers and Mercuria.

This filing also requires — as a condition to the equity infusion — the implementation of amendments to two of five of the debtors’ gathering agreements and the rejection, assumption or consensual amendment of the remaining three agreements. Why? The debtors note:

“…certain of the Gathering Agreements impose significant minimum volume commitments (“MVCs”) at uneconomic fixed prices, thereby requiring ARE, the debtor party to the agreements, to pay for pipeline access, whether or not it is fully utilizing that capacity.”

Significantly, the debtors have reached agreement with the two gathering agreement counterparties on more realistic obligations in the current nat gas environment. Accordingly, the debtors hope to have this case completed by the end of February.


*Credit for “Crapter 11” belongs to loyal reader, David Guess, a Partner, who, congratulations are in order, recently moved over to Greenberg Traurig in Irvine CA. Cheers David!

**That is, unless we factor in the professionals. Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP, Alvarez & Marsal LLC, PJT Partners Inc., and Prime Clerk LLC all get a second bite at the apple. Who says that debtor-work doesn’t have recurring revenue??

  • Jurisdiction: D. of Delaware (Judge Shannon)

  • Capital Structure: See Above.

  • Professionals:

    • Legal: Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP (Michael Torkin, Kathrine McLendon, Nicholas Baker, William Russell Jr., Edward Linden, Jamie Fell) & Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor LLP (Pauline Morgan, Kara Coyle, Ashley Jacobs)

    • Financial Advisor: Alvarez & Marsal LLC

    • Investment Banker: PJT Partners Inc. (Avi Robbins)

    • Claims Agent: Prime Clerk LLC (*click on the link above for free docket access)

  • Other Parties in Interest:

    • Prepetition RBL Agent and DIP Agent: Citibank NA

      • Legal: Paul Hastings LLP (Andrew Tenzer) & Richards Layton & Finger PA (Mark Collins, David Queroli)

      • Financial Advisor: RPA Advisors

    • Gathering Agreement Counterparty: Equitrans Midstream Corporation ($ETRN)

      • Legal: Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney PC (Mary Caloway, Mark Pfeiffer, TImothy Palmer)