🚜New Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Filing - Tea Olive I LLC (d/b/a Stock+Field)🚜

in

Tea Olive I LLC (d/b/a Stock+Field)

The #retailapocalypse is indiscriminate. Sometimes it likes to take down big prey like J.C. Penney or J. Crew but other times it just wants to snag some low hanging fruit via the path of least resistance. That means that a number of retailers those of us in our bubbles in major coastal cities have maybe never heard of will find their way into a bankruptcy court. And a bankruptcy court outside of Delaware or Texas no less.

Like Tea Olive I LLC (d/b/a Stock+Field) for instance. The Minnesota-based “farm, home and outdoor retailer” operates 25 stores across the mid-West. It only sells “a small amount of products…online.” While that’s obviously pretty lame, this place seems like a smorgasbord of fun: in one fell swoop you can go in and pick up, among other things, some dog food, a kayak, some beekeeping equipment, some lawn fertilizer, workwear and apparel, a grill, paint, a new HVAC unit, auto parts, food, toys and firearms! A Christmas bonanza, this place must be! Earl Jr. can get himself a little toy gun while Big Earl can get himself a grenade launcher and AR-15. Everybody wins!

Well, not everybody. Unfortunately, the place is liquidating, a sad post-holidays result for the 1,000 full and part-time employees that work there.

In 2018, the debtor did $176mm of revenue and adjusted EBITDA of $5.1mm. In 2019, to differentiate itself from other unrelated “Big R” entities in the US, the debtor changed its name from “Big R Stores” to “Stock+Field” expecting some short-term drops in performance but expecting those drops to be mere blips on the road to a stronger future. And, in fact, the company did suffer a small drop in performance: it did $173.9mm in revenue and $1.6mm in adjusted EBITDA. 2020 was supposed to be the year.

Spoiler alert: it wasn’t. Not for literally anybody on the planet (well, other than maybe Elon Musk, Joseph Biden, fans of Brexit…ah…you get the idea…there are exceptions to literally everything). Per the company:

In the beginning of 2020, the Debtor continued its rebranding efforts and expected the business to grow throughout the year. However, the Covid-19 pandemic unexpectedly upset all expectations for 2020. All of the Debtor’s 25 stores were open under strict capacity and operating hour restrictions due to the pandemic. Additionally, the pandemic itself has altered the shopping behaviors of the Debtor’s consumers, with some customers not feeling comfortable entering physical stores to shop. While the Debtor sells some products online, the majority of its products are sold solely in stores.

😬Apparently they didn’t get the omni-channel memo. For fiscal year 2020, therefore, the debtor estimates $141.5mm in revenue and -$2.2mm in adjusted EBITDA. Consequently, the company hired restructuring professionals to pursue a financing options and/or a sale. But had no luck. The company then hired Tiger Capital Group to pursue liquidation. Get ready for…

The debtor owes $29.7mm to its senior secured lender, CIT Northbridge Credit LLC pursuant to a credit agreement entered into in early March 2020. Query how seriously the various parties were taking COVID-19 given the timing. Still, the debtor estimates its inventory value to be $45.6mm and it also has $734k of A/R and prepaid assets against $26.5mm in trade debt (inclusive of approximately $1mm in 503(b)(9) claims).* The size of general unsecured creditor recoveries — certain to be less than 100% — will definitely depend on whether there are shoppers out there who are willing to risk contracting COVID-19 simply to hit the bid on that alleged $45.6mm in inventory value.

One question that also arises with retail cases is what happens with gift cards? It appears the debtor intends to honor outstanding gift cards until February 8, 2021. Hurry out, y’all, and get yourself some new toys and firearms just in time for the Civil War.

*For the uninitiated, the Bankruptcy Code provides that suppliers of goods delivered to a debtor in the ordinary course of business in the 20 days prior to a petition date be allowed as administrative expenses.

PETITION is a digital media company that provides curated content, analysis and commentary about distressed investing, bankruptcy and restructuring. We discuss disruption from the vantage point of the disrupted. For “all-access” to our content, lease visit us here.

Date: January 10, 2020

Jurisdiction: D. of Minnesota (Judge Fisher)

Capital Structure: $29.7mm funded secured debt (Second Avenue Capital Partners LLC)

Company Professionals:

  • Legal: Fredrikson & Byron PA (Clinton Cutler, James Brand, Steven Kinsella, Samuel Andre)

  • Restructuring Advisor: Clear Thinking Group (Michael Wesley)

  • Liquidator: Tiger Capital Group LLC

  • Investment Banker: Steeplechase Advisors LLC (James Cullen, Dan O’Rourke, David Burke, Nate Anderson, Eddie Doherty, Amy Rose)

  • Claims Agent: Donlin Recano (Click here for free docket access)

Other Parties in Interest:

  • Secured Loan Agent: Second Avenue Capital Partners LLC

  • Secured Lender: CIT Northbridge Credit LLC

    • Legal: Riemer & Braunstein LLP (Steven Fox)

New Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Filing - Stein Mart Inc. ($SMRT)

in

Stein Mart Inc.

Man. This story sucks. Stein Mart Inc. ($SMRT), a publicly-traded specialty off-price retailer with 281 stores across the Southeast, Texas, Arizona and California is the latest retailer to file bankruptcy (along with two affiliates).

To set the stage, imagine Han and Lando taking a fun little ride on a desert skiff. Suddenly a riot breaks out and amidst the confusion Lando falls off the skiff. Luckily, Han is able to grab Lando’s hand so that Lando doesn’t plummet into the gnarley tentacles of some strange sand beast that randomly happens to be there. As Han pulls Lando up out of reach of the beast, all of the sudden some crazy space virus flows through the airspace and smacks Han straight in the lungs. As he clutches his throat struggling to breathe, he releases Lando who consequently hurls straight down towards the beast and suffers a horrific death.

Now replace (a) Han with Kingswood Capital Management LLC, (b) Lando with Stein Mart, and (c) the “crazy space virus” with COVID-19 and you’ve basically got the story of Stein Mart’s collapse into bankruptcy court. Like many other retailers in this macro climate, Stein Mart was teetering pre-COVID. Sales have been on the decline since 2016. But then in January, Kingswood — along with an entity managed by the Chairman of the company — offered a roughly 20% premium over SMRT’s then-stock price ($0.90/share) to take Stein Mart private. Stein Mart, which had been on distressed watch lists around that time, seemed to be on the receiving end of a much-needed and wildly opportune lifeline. Of course, COVID ended that. Take a look at this mind-boggling decline in YOY performance:

Screen Shot 2020-08-14 at 11.11.32 AM.png

Ab. So. Lutely. Brutal. Just brutal.

Kingswood agreed. Per the company:

…on April 16, 2020, the Merger Agreement was terminated prior to closing because the COVID19 pandemic forced the Company to close all of its stores and the Company was unable to satisfy the minimum liquidity closing condition in the merger agreement.

Was that the definitive end of the deal? No! The parties continued to discuss new deal parameters but then we, as a country, couldn’t get our sh*t in order. With the country averaging 1000+ deaths a day and tens of thousands of new daily COVID infections, Kingswood got skittish:

The Company has subsequently engaged in discussions with Kingswood regarding sale of the Company as a going-concern in recent months pursuant to a bankruptcy sale; however, a transaction presently appears unlikely given the COVID-19 resurgence.

The resurgence is notable because the company has a significant number of stores in Florida, Texas and California. Consequently,…

The Company’s updated financial projections, following the July resurgence of COVID-19, indicated that the Company would not have sufficient liquidity to continue operating the business in the ordinary course consistent with past practice.

So now the company is liquidating. The company projects $250mm in gross recovery from the liquidation of inventory, equipment, fixtures, leases IP and other assets. As of the petition date, it owes its senior secured lender, Wells Fargo Bank NA ($WFC), $84mm; it also owed its term lender, Gordon Brothers Finance Company, $35mm. Tack on administrative expenses for the professionals administering the case and recoveries for those creditors owed a sum total of $770mm in total liabilities begins to look a bit bleak.

*****

A couple of additional notes:

First, this company appears to have been addicted to factoring. Among the companies top six general unsecured creditors are CIT Commercial Services, Wells Fargo Trade Capital Services, and White Oak Commercial Finance.

Second, you can add SMRT to the list of companies that tapped PPP funds yet couldn’t avoid a bankruptcy filing. It received $10mm from Harvest Small Business Finance LLC.

Third, we’re back to borderline collusion among the liquidation firms. The company’s financial advisor issued RFPs to five liquidation consultants. It received two bids back: one from SB360 Capital Partners LLC and one from a Hilco Merchant Resources-led joint venture that included three — that’s right, three — competitors. Per the company:

The Debtors are of the view that in the current environment, where numerous large retailers are being simultaneously liquidated, joint venture liquidation bids are common because a single liquidation firm may not have the resources to staff and manage the entire project. (emphasis added)

Said another way, the retail industry is such an utter dumpster fire right now that liquidators simply don’t have the bandwidth to manage mandates like these on their own (or so the story goes).

While liquidation sales launch, the company will also seek to sell its leases and IP. Except…

…substantial doubt exists as to whether any buyers will be found for leases given the current depressed condition of the retail real estate market.

And they…

…do not anticipate the sale of intellectual property will produce substantial value.

Right. In case you haven’t noticed, the rubber meets the road with these retailers with the IP. That’s why there was the law suit in the Neiman Marcus matter. That’s why there was the asset stripping transaction in the J.Crew matter. But Stein Mart? IP? Brand? Hahahahaha. The company’s bankers tried selling this turd for over 2.5 years. The only buyer was Kingswood, a small LA-based PE fund with a portfolio of four companies and, well, Stein himself. The IP only had value to him. Go figure. And this is after three — yes, three — separate sale and marketing processes.

Is there a chance a buyer emerges from the shadows? Sure. Miracles happen. If not, Wells and Gordon Brothers will be fine. The professionals will get paid. The unsecured creditors will get hosed. Equity will…well forget about it. At least the equity market is finally getting these right (though reasonable minds could certainly question why the stock is trading as high as it is):

Screen Shot 2020-08-14 at 11.12.13 AM.png

The greater likelihood is that this sucker ends in structured dismissal or a conversion to chapter 7.

It’s crazy. Eight months ago the company was headed for a new chapter. Instead the book shut closed.

August 12, 2020

Jurisdiction: M.D. of FL (Judge Funk)

Capital Structure: see above

Company Professionals:

  • Legal: Foley & Lardner LLP (Gardner Davis, John Wolfel, Neda Sharifi, Richard Guyer, Mark Wolfson, Marcus Helt)

  • Financial Advisor: Clear Thinking Group (Patrick Diercks)

  • Liquidators: Hilco Merchant Resources LLC, Gordon Brothers Retail Partners LLC, Great American Group LLC, Tiger Capital Group LLC, SB360 Capital Partners LLC

  • Claims Agent: Stretto (Click here for free docket access)

Other Parties in Interest:

  • RCF Lender: Wells Fargo Bank NA

    • Legal: Otterbourg PC (Daniel Fiorillo, Chad Simon) & Smith Hulsey & Busey (John Thomas, Stephen Busey)

🇲🇽 New Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Filing - Grupo Famsa S.A.B. de C.V. 🇲🇽

in

Grupo Famsa S.A.B. de C.V.

June 26, 2020

This may very well be the most boring bankruptcy case of all time.

Grupo Famsa S.A.B. de C.V., a Mexican retailer and personal lender with 22 stores and 29 personal loan branches in the states of Texas and Illinois (in addition to 379 stores in Mexico), filed a prepackaged chapter 11 bankruptcy case in the Southern District of New York to basically just refi out a whopping $59.1mm of 7.25% senior notes that were due on June 1 2020. These 2020 notes constitute a remaining stub piece that didn’t participate in an October 2019 exchange offer. In that transaction, the then-outstanding 2020 notes were exchanged for 9.75% senior secured notes due 2024. $80.9mm tendered into that offer. The $59.1mm at issue here … uh … well, clearly … did not.

Holders of the 2020 notes who vote in favor of the plan will get new Series A notes in the same principal amount plus interest and cash in an amount of $10 per $1,000 principal amount of 2020 notes. These Series A notes will pay 10.25% interest and mature in December ‘23.

Those who reject the plan will receive new Series B notes in the same principal amount equal to what they hold (read: no cash payment). The Series B notes accrue interest at 9.75% and mature in December ‘24. All other potential claims against the debtor will be reinstated or unimpaired.

The upshot? It paid to holdout! Those who support the plan and get the Series A notes will get the same principal amount of notes, a higher rate and have shorter duration risk. Well played.

  • Jurisdiction: S.D. of New York (Judge Chapman)

  • Professionals:

    • Legal: Paul Hastings LLP (Pedro Jimenez, Shlomo Maza, Derek Cash)

    • Claims Agent: Epiq Bankruptcy Solutions LLC (*click on the link above for free docket access)

New Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Filing - Tuesday Morning Corporation ($TUES)

in

Tuesday Morning Corporation

May 27, 2020

Dallas-based Tuesday Morning Corporation ($TUES) is 80% open now — just in time to start closing 230 of its brick-and-mortar locations (132 in a first phase and 100 more in a follow-up phase) and commence liquidations sales while in bankruptcy. This, in a nutshell, ladies and gentlemen, sums up the plight of retail today.

If you tune in to CNBC or Bloomberg, one could be forgiven for thinking that a retailer like TUES might actually do relatively well during shelter-in times. It specializes in upscale home furnishings, textiles and housewares for crying out loud. According to the talking heads, everyone is spending time at home judging the inadequacy of their living accommodations — a process that ought to serve as a real boost to home furnishing specialists ((e.g., Restoration Hardware Inc. ($RH)) and home improvement companies ((e.g., Home Depot Inc. ($HD) and Lowe’s Companies Inc. ($LOW)). Not so much for TUES, apparently: the total lack of online presence and the company’s 100% reliance on in-store sales certainly didn’t help matters. The pandemic and related fallout “…resulted in a near-total cessation of new revenue beginning in March 2020.” Repeat: Near. Total. Cessation. Yikes.

Indeed, the debtors’ website serves a very limited purpose: it has a store locator. One literally cannot transact on the site. That said, there does appear to be pent up demand: the company reports that since re-opening its stores on April 24, comp store sales for the reopened stores have been approximately 10% higher than the same period in fiscal ‘19. Perhaps people DID, in fact, identify a lot of things they wanted to remedy at home! And they’re clamoring for that “treasure hunt” experience, y’all!!

What’s somewhat sad about that is, looking at the debtors’ list of top 40 unsecured trade creditors, nearly every vendor they do business with is US-based. In fact, the debtors source 80% of their inventory from US vendors. These store closures and the attendant loss of volume will cascade through the economy. Sigh.

Anyway, we previously wrote about the company in February upon the company’s Q2 ‘20 earnings report. We noted:

Quick coverage of this Dallas-based off-price retailer because, well, it’s performing like dogsh*t. The company reported Q2 ‘20 numbers last week. They. Were. Not. Good.

Nope. Like, not at all. Here are some highlights:

- A 4.1% decrease in net sales YOY driven primarily by a 3% decrease in comp store sales;

- A 3.7% decrease in the size of the average ticket, offset only somewhat by a 0.7% increase in customer transactions (read: more people buying less stuff — not exactly a testament to inventory quality);

- Declining gross margin (down 1.9%);

- Operating income down $5.2mm for the Q and $6.3mm for the 1H of fiscal ‘20;

- Cash is burning, down $6.5mm from June 2019.

The company blamed this piss poor performance on the shortened holiday calendar (how predictable) and uber-competition within that period that resulted in heavy promotions.

We further noted that the company had 175 leases rolling off in the next 12 months and, therefore, “…this is more a lease story than a bankruptcy story.” Whoops. Our crystal ball didn’t pick up on COVID-19. We further noted:

The company has no maturities prior to 2024 and has significant room under its $180mm revolving credit facility ($91.4mm of availability). Still, this thing needs its performance to turn around or it will be dancing with several other distressed retailers soon enough.

“Soon enough” came quicker than we anticipated.

The problem is that not only did the shut-down completely shut the revenue spigot, it also led the debtors to default, as of March 2020, under their revolving credit facility (“RCF”). The RCF Credit Agreement had a provision prohibiting the debtors from “suspend[ing] the operation of its business in the ordinary course of business.” Ever since, they have been in a state of continued negotiation and forbearance with their RCF enders, JPMorgan Chase Bank NA ($JPM), Wells Fargo Bank NA ($WFC), and Bank of America NA ($BAC).

That negotiation has borne fruit. The debtors obtained a DIP financing commitment of $100mm which will consist of some new money as well as a “gradual” roll-up of pre-petition funded debt ($47.9mm + $8.8mm LOCs). The debtors will pay a 2% upfront fee, a 0.5% unused commitment fee and customary letter of credit fees. “The interest rate under the DIP Documents is, either (at the Debtors’ option), (a) a 3 month LIBO Rate (2.0% floor) + 3.00% per annum or (b) CBFR (2.0% floor) + 2.0% per annum, payable on each applicable Interest Payment Date, in cash, provided that no Interest Period may extend beyond the Maturity Date.”

So what now? The debtors main assets are their inventory, a Dallas distribution center and corporate office, and equipment; they also have upwards of $100mm in net operating losses. There isn’t a lot of debt on balance sheet: this is not an example of a private equity firm coming in and dividending all of the value out of the enterprise. Rather, the crux of this case in the near-term will be, as we noted back in February, about the rejection of hundreds of leases and the stream-lining of the debtors’ footprint to a leaner operation. The crux longer-term, however, will be whether there’s any reason for this business to exist. Will the lenders enter into an exit facility? Will there be a plan of reorganization that will allow the debtors to emerge as reorganized debtors? Will there be a sale of substantially all of the assets? The chapter 11 bankruptcy process will be used to hopefully find answers to these questions.

  • Jurisdiction: N.D. of TX (Judge Hale)

  • Capital Structure: $47.9mm funded RCF + $8.8mm LOCs

  • Professionals:

    • Legal: Haynes and Boone LLP (Ian Peck, Stephen Pezanosky, Jarom Yates)

    • Financial Advisor: AlixPartners LLP (Barry Folse, Ray Adams, Wilmer Cerda, JR Bryant)

    • Investment Banker: Stifel Nicolaus & Co. Inc. & Stifel Nicolaus-Miller Buckfire & Co. LLC (James Doak)

    • Real Estate Advisor: A&G Realty Partners LLC

    • Liquidation Consultant: Great American Group LLC

    • Claims Agent: Epiq Corporate Restructuring LLC (*click on the link above for free docket access)

  • Other Parties in Interest:

    • DIP Agent: JPMorgan Chase Bank NA

      • Legal: Vinson & Elkins LLP (William Wallander, Bradley Foxman)

    • Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors

      • Legal: Montgomery McCracken Walker & Rhoads LLP (Edward Schnitzer, Gilbert Saydah Jr., David Banker) & Munsch Hardt Kopf & Harr PC (Kevin Lippman, Deborah Parry)

New Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Filing - J.C. Penney Company Inc. ($JCP)

in

J.C. Penney Company Inc.

May 15, 2020

Let’s be clear about something right off the bat. Encino Man, Captain America and Austin Powers could all suddenly surface from being entombed in ice for decades and even THEY wouldn’t be surprised that Texas-based J.C. Penney Company Inc. (and 17 affiliates, the “debtors”) filed for chapter 11 bankruptcy.

There are a couple of ways to look at this one.

First, there’s the debtors’ way. Not one to squander a solid opportunity, the debtors dive under “COVID Cover”:

“Before the pandemic, the Company had a substantial liquidity cushion, was improving its operations, and was proactively engaging with creditors to deleverage its capital structure and extend its debt maturities to build a healthier balance sheet. Unfortunately, that progress was wiped out with the onset of COVID-19. And now, the Company is unable to maintain its upward trajectory through its “Plan for Renewal.” Moreover, following the temporary shutdown of its 846 brick-and-mortar stores, the Company is unable to responsibly pay the upcoming debt service on its over-burdened capital structure.”

The debtors note that since Jill Soltau became CEO on October 2, 2018, the debtors have been off to the races with their “Plan for Renewal” strategy. This strategy was focused on getting back to JCP’s fundamentals. It emphasized (a) offering compelling merchandise, (b) delivering an engaging experience, (c) driving traffic online and to stores (including providing buy online, pickup in store or curbside pickup — the latest in retail technology that literally everyone is doing), (d) fueling growth, and (e) developing a results-minded culture. The debtors are quick to point out that all of this smoky verbiage is leading to “meaningful progress” — something they define as “…having just achieved comparable store sales improvement in six of eight merchandise divisions in the second half of 2019 over the first half, and successfully meeting or exceeding guidance on all key financial objectives for the 2019 fiscal year.” The debtors further highlight:

The five financial objectives were: (a) Comparable stores sales were expected to be down between 7-8% (stores sales were down 7.7%); (b) adjusted comparable store sales, which excludes the impact of the Company’s exit from major appliances and in-store furniture categories were expected to be down in a range of 5-6% (adjusted comparable store sales down 5.6%); (c) cost of goods sold, as a rate of net sales was expected to decrease 150-200 basis points (decreased approximately 210 basis points over prior year, which resulted in improved gross margin); (d) adjusted EBITDA was $583 million (a 2.6% improvement over prior year); and (e) free cash flow for fiscal year 2019 was $145 million, beating the target of positive.

Not exactly the highest bar in certain respects but, sure, progress nonetheless we suppose. The debtors point out, on multiple occasions, that prior to COVID-19, its “…projections showed sufficient liquidity to maintain operations without any restructuring transaction.” Maintain being the operative word. Everyone knows the company is in the midst of a slow death.

To prolong life, the focus has been on and remains on high-margin goods (which explains the company getting out of low-margin furniture and appliances and a renewed focus on private label), reducing inventory, and developing a new look for JCP’s stores which, interestingly, appears to focus on the “experiential” element that everyone has ballyhooed over the last several years which is now, in a COVID world, somewhat tenuous.

Which gets us to the way the market has looked at this. The numbers paint an ugly picture. Total revenues went from $12.87b in fiscal year ‘18 to $12b in ‘19. Gross margin also declined from 36% to 34%. In the LTM as of 2/1/20 (pre-COVID), revenue was looking like $11.1b. Curious. But, yeah, sure COGs decreased as has SG&A. People still aren’t walking through the doors and buying sh*t though. A fact reflected by the stock price which has done nothing aside from slowly slide downward since new management onboarded:

Screen Shot 2020-05-16 at 10.14.19 AM.png

All of this performance has also obviously called into question the debtors’ ability to grow into its capital structure:

Screen Shot 2020-05-16 at 11.54.57 AM.png

Here’s a more detailed look at the breakdown of unsecured funded debt:

Screen Shot 2020-05-16 at 12.57.22 PM.png

And yet, prior to COVID, the debt stack has more or less held up. Here is the chart for JCP’s ‘23 5.875% $500mm senior secured first lien notes from the date of new management’s start to today:

Screen Shot 2020-05-16 at 12.01.41 PM.png

Here is the chart for JCP’s ‘25 8.624% $400mm second lien notes from the date of new management’s start to today:

Screen Shot 2020-05-16 at 12.04.49 PM.png

And here is our absolute favorite: JCP’s ‘97 7.625% $500mm senior unsecured notes:

Screen Shot 2020-05-16 at 12.06.37 PM.png

The fact that these notes were in the 20s mere months ago is mind-boggling.

We talk a lot about how bankruptcy filings are a way to tell a story. And, here, the debtors, while not trying to hide their stretched balance sheet nor the pains of brick-and-mortar department stores with a 846-store footprint, are certainly trying to spin a positive story about management and the new strategic direction — all while highlighting that there are pockets of value here. For instance, of those 846 stores, 387 of them are owned, including 110 operating on ground leases. The private brand portfolio — acquired over decades — represents 46% of total merchandise sales. The debtors also own six of their 11 distribution centers and warehouses.

With that in mind, prior to COVID, management and their advisors were trying to be proactive about the balance sheet — primarily the term loans and first lien secured notes maturing in 2023. In Q3 ‘19, the debtors engaged with their first lien noteholders, term lenders and second lien noteholders on proposals that would, among other things, address those maturities, promote liquidity, and reduce interest expense. According to the debtors, they came close. A distressed investor was poised to purchase more than $750mm of the term loans and, in connection with a new $360mm FILO facility, launch the first step of a broader process that would have kicked maturities out a few years. In exchange, the debtors would lien up unencumbered collateral (real estate). Enter COVID. The deal went up in smoke.

There’s a new “deal” in its stead. A restructuring support agreement filed along with the bankruptcy papers contemplates a new post-reorg operating company (“New JCP”) and a new REIT which will issue new common stock and new interests, respectively. Beyond that, not much is clear from the filing: the term sheet has a ton of blanks in it:

Screen Shot 2020-05-16 at 12.42.42 PM.png
Screen Shot 2020-05-16 at 12.42.53 PM.png

There’s clearly a lot of work to do here. There’s also the “Market Test” element which entails, among other things, running new financing processes, pursuing potential sale/leaseback transactions, and pursuing a sale of the all or part of the debtors’ assets. If the debtors don’t have a business plan by July 14 and binding commitments for third-party financing by August 15, the debtors are required to immediately cease pursuing a plan and must instead pursue a 363 of all of their assets. Said another way, if the economy continues to decline, consumer spending doesn’t recover, and credit markets tighten up, there’s a very good chance that JCP could liquidate. Remember: retail sales sunk to a record low in April. Is that peak pain? Or will things get worse as the unemployment rate takes root? Will people shop at JC Penney if they even shop at all? There are numerous challenges here.

The debtors will use cash collateral for now and later seek approval of a $900mm DIP credit facility of which $450mm will be new money (L+11.75% continues the trend of expensive retail DIPs). It matures in 180 days, giving the debtors 6 months to get this all done.

*****

A few more notes as there are definitely clear winners and losers here.

Let’s start with the losers:

  1. The Malls. It’s one thing when one department store files for bankruptcy and sheds stores. It’s an entirely different story when several of them go bankrupt at the same time and shed stores. This is going to be a bloodbath. Already, the debtors have a motion on file seeking to reject 20 leases.

  2. Nike Inc. ($NKE) & Adidas ($ADDYY). Perhaps they’re covered by 503(b)(9) status or maybe they can slickster their way into critical vendor status (all for which the debtors seek $15.1mm on an interim basis and $49.6mm on a final basis). Regardless, showing up among the top creditors in both the Stage Stores Inc. bankruptcy and now the J.C. Penney bankruptcy makes for a horrible week.

  3. The Geniuses Who Invested in JCP Debt that Matures in 2097. As CNBC’s Michael Santoli noted, “This JC Penney issue fell only 77 years short of maturing money-good.”

  4. Bill Ackman & Ron Johnson. This.

And here are the winners:

  1. The New York Times. Imperfect as it may be, their digitalization efforts allow us all to read and marvel about the life of James Cash Penney, a name that so befitting of a Quentin Tarantino movie that you can easily imagine JC chillin with Jack Dalton on some crazy Hollywood adventure. We read it with sadness as he boasts of the Golden Rule and profit-sharing. Profits alone would be nice, let alone sharing.

  2. Kirkland & Ellis LLP. Seriously. These guys are smoking it and have just OWNED retail. In the past eight days alone the firm has filed Stage Stores Inc., Neiman Marcus Group LTD LLC and now JCP. It’s a department store hat trick. Zoom out from retail and add in Ultra Petroleum Corp. and Intelsat SA and these folks are lucky they’re working from home. They can’t afford to waste any billable minutes on a commute at this point.

  3. Management. They’re getting what they paid for AND, consequently, they’re getting paid. No doubt Kirkland marched in there months ago and pitched/promised management that they’d secure lucrative pay packages for them if hired and … BOOM! $7.5mm to four members of management!

  • Jurisdiction: S.D. of Texas (Judge Jones)

  • Capital Structure: See above.

  • Professionals:

    • Legal: Kirkland & Ellis LLP (Joshua Sussberg, Christopher Marcus, Aparna Yenamandra, Rebecca Blake Chaikin, Allyson Smith Weinhouse, Jake William Gordon) & Jackson Walker LLP (Matthew Cavenaugh, Jennifer Wertz, Kristhy Peguero, Veronica Polnick)

    • OpCo (JC Penney Corporation Inc.) Independent Directors: Alan Carr, Steven Panagos

      • Legal: Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP (Steven Reisman)

    • PropCo (JCP Real Estate Holdings LLC & JC Penney Properties LLC) Independent Directors: William Transier, Heather Summerfield

      • Legal: Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP

    • Financial Advisor: AlixPartners LLP (James Mesterharm, Deb Reiger-Paganis)

    • Investment Banker: Lazard Freres & Co. LLC (David Kurtz, Christian Tempke, Michael Weitz)

    • Store Closing Consultant: Gordon Brothers Retail Partners LLC

    • Real Estate Consultants: B. Riley Real Estate LLC & Cushman & Wakefield US Inc.

    • Claims Agent: Prime Clerk LLC (*click on the link above for free docket access)

  • Other Parties in Interest:

    • DIP Agent: GLAS USA LLC

      • Legal: Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer

    • RCF Agent: Wells Fargo Bank NA

      • Legal: Otterbourg PC & Bracewell LLP (William Wood)

      • Financial Advisor: M-III Partners (Mo Meghli)

    • TL Agent: JPMorgan Chase Bank NA

    • Indenture Trustee: Wilmington Trust NA

    • Ad Hoc Group of Certain Term Loan Lenders & First Lien Noteholders & DIP Lenders (H/2 Capital Partners, Ares Capital Management, Silver Point Capital, KKR, Whitebox Advisors, Sculptor Capital Management, Brigade Capital Management, Apollo, Owl Creek Asset Management LP, Sixth Street Partners)

      • Legal: Milbank LLP (Dennis Dunne, Andrew Leblanc, Thomas Kreller, Brian Kinney) & Porter Hedges LLP

      • Financial Advisor: Houlihan Lokey (Saul Burian)

    • Second Lien Noteholders (GoldenTree Asset Management, Carlson, Contrarian Capital Management LLC, Littlejohn & Co.)

      • Legal: Stroock & Stroock & Lavan LLP (Kris Hansen) & Haynes and Boone LLP (Kelli Norfleet, Charles Beckham)

      • Financial Advisor: Evercore Group LLC (Roopesh Shah)

    • Large equityholder: BlackRock Inc. (13.85%)

🥾New Chapter 15 Bankruptcy Filing & CCAA - The Aldo Group Inc.🥾

in ,

The Aldo Group Inc.

May 7, 2020

Retail pain doesn’t respect borders. Canada-based The Aldo Group Inc. and eight (8) affiliated companies (collectively, the “Debtors”) filed petitions in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware seeking relief under chapter 15 of the United States Bankruptcy Code in support of a CCAA filing in Canada.

Aldo is a shoe retailer with stores in more than 100 countries. The Group notes roughly 3,000 points of sale with 700 directly owned stores and the remainder as franchises. There are 289 stores in Canada and 429 in the US.

In terms of funded debt, the Aldo Canada has CDN$140mm outstanding. Of that amount, Aldo US is an obligor on a CDN$100mm piece. Both entities are also co-borrowers on a CDN$300mm unsecured syndicated loan. Both the Aldo Canada and Aldo US have significant outstanding amounts to trade creditors including landlords who haven’t been paid for April or May.

Operating performance has been dogsh*t long before COVID hit the scene. Per the debtors:

Over the past few years, the Aldo Corporate Group has declined in profitability and regularly reported losses. For instance, for the twelve month period ending February 1, 2020, Aldo Canada posted a net loss from operations of approximately CDN$74,800,000 and Aldo U.S. posted a net loss of approximately USD$52,800,000. Taking into consideration yearend write-offs of amounts due from subsidiaries and affiliated and write-offs of future tax benefits that were recorded as an asset, Aldo Canada posted a net loss of approximately CDN$170,300,000 and Aldo U.S. posted a net loss of approximately USD$97,300,000.

Pre-COVID, the debtors were attempting an operational restructuring designed to de-emphasize brick-and-mortar stores and prop up e-commerce, wholesale and franchise channels. You know, like, the old playbook. They were also seeking to refinance the credit facility with an ABL. The “transformation” was allegedly on track when the pandemic struck precipitating an immediate liquidity crunch. Hence, the filing.

The debtors will use the filing to evaluate its store profitability, shed leases and contracts and restructure the unsecured loans both in Canada and the US.

It seems pretty safe to say that a good number of those US stores will join the retail garbage bin much to the chagrin of landlords.

  • Jurisdiction: D. of Delaware (Judge Owens)

  • Capital Structure: see above.

  • Professionals:

    • Legal: Hogan Lovells US LLP (Peter Ivanick, Lynn Holbert, Alex Sher, Baraka Nasari) & Morris Nichols Arsht & Tunnell LLP (Eric Schwartz, Matthew Harvey, Paige Topper)

    • Canadian Monitor: Ernst & Young Inc.

    • Investment Banker: Greenhill & Co. Canada Ltd.

    • Claims Agent: Epiq (*click on the link above for free docket access)

  • Other Parties in Interest:

    • Largest Unsecured Creditor: Bank of Montreal

      • Legal: Chapman and Cutler LLP (Stephen Tetro, Aaron Krieger) & Womble Bond Dickinson US LLP (Matthew Ward, Morgan Patterson)

🎸New Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Filing - John Varvatos Enterprises Inc.🎸

in

John Varvatos Enterprises Inc.

May 6, 2020

“The rebel spirit inherent in the brand imbues confidence in the man who wears it.”

You know what doesn’t imbue confidence? Chapter 11 bankruptcy. Alas, John Varvatos Enterprises Inc. and two affiliates (the “debtors”) filed for bankruptcy in the District of Delaware. Rock on!! 🤘

Everyone knows the John Varvatos brand. Think Led Zeppelin. Think you’re suddenly single uncle who, after two decades of marital imprisonment and anguish, suddenly discovered this technology called “online dating.” Think Bloomingdale’s. Think over-priced tailored clothing that doesn’t last more than a few months due to its shoddy “craftsmanship.” Think over-paying for a brand name. Iconic!

The debtors generally have four revenue streams: (a) their 27 brick-and-mortar locations + department store and specialty wholesale distribution; (b) e-commerce; (c) licensed product; and (d) foreign licensing in Canada and Mexico. It may have been too much. The debtors note:

…the Debtors have historically pursued many business streams at the same time, including wholesale, full price retail, outlet retail, ecommerce, international distribution and licensing. Even though the company attains healthy revenue streams, the overhead required to manage these initiatives, coupled with retail stores’ declining performance and increasing rental costs, caused the business to sustain continued losses.

But that’s not all. It turns out the debtors have had issues since 2015. It acknowledges “cost cutting measures” which, to our point above about quality, may have something to do with diminished performance. It also apparently alienated loyal customers who were turned off by the brand’s attempts to go mass consumption. Mass market does not equal rock n’ roll. Duh. Partners noticed: Nordstrom relaxed its relationship with the debtors which translated into a $4.6mm sales and $2.6mm gross profit decline from ‘18 to ‘19.

Pre-COVID, things appeared to be turning around. New management? Check! Revitalized product? Check. Reduced overhead? Check. The debtors “…experienced near double digit sales increases in its full price retail stores and through its ecommerce business as the Debtors’ new apparel collections were extremely well-received by the Debtors’ customers.” Rockin. And rollin.

Like a drunken fan who stumbles into the sound system, COVID-19 came roaring through and crashed the party. Since then, the debtors have had to rely exclusively on e-commerce. That, however, wasn’t enough considering the debtors’ extensive obligations — including $2.1mm a month on rent and at least $6.8mm owned to third-party trade creditors. By necessity, the debtors pivoted to a marketing process with the hope of securing a sale that would maximize value.

This is where a familiar friend stepped up to the plate. Lion/Hendrix Cayman Limited, the debtors’ pre-petition equityholder and pre-petition lender to the tune of $94.8mm (placed recently in February), stepped up to the plate as both DIP lender and stalking horse purchaser of the assets (PETITION Note: A quick digression. Lion/Hendrix Cayman Limited is owned by Lion Capital Fund III, the third of private equity firm Lion Capital’s four funds. That fund apparently raised 1.5b Euro and invested in 12 companies. This is the second one to file for bankruptcy in the last six months. See also Bumble Bee Parent Inc.).

The terms of the purchase include a $76mm credit bid, $19.45mm to paydown Wells Fargo Bank NA, and wind-down expenses. Lion/Hendrix will also have a deficiency claim equal to $76mm-$19.45mm that will share pro rata with general unsecured creditors but for a token $250k “minimum GUC recovery amount” (which, depending upon the monetization of any excluded sale assets, Lion/Hendrix would be on the hook to fund). The DIP commitment is for $20.5mm of which approximately $13.6mm is rollup of the secured notes.

  • Jurisdiction: D. of Delaware (Judge Walrath)

  • Capital Structure: $19.45mm RCF, $94.8mm secured notes (Lion/Hendrix Cayman Limited)

  • Professionals:

    • Legal: Morris Nichols Arsht & Tunnell LLP (Derek Abbott, Matthew Talmo, Andrew Workman)

    • Financial Advisor: Clear Thinking Group

    • Investment Banker: MMG Advisors Inc.

    • Claims Agent: Omni (*click on the link above for free docket access)

  • Other Parties in Interest:

    • Pre-petition RCF Agent: Wells Fargo Bank NA

      • Legal: Riemer & Braunstein LLP (Donald Rothman, Brendan Recupero, Paul Bekkar) & Burr & Forman LLP (J. Cory Falgowski)

    • Stalking Horse Purchaser & DIP Lender ($20.5mm): Lion/Hendrix Cayman Limited

      • Legal: Sullivan & Cromwell LLP (James Bromley, David Zylberberg) & Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor LLP (Pauline Morgan, Sean Greecher)

💪 New Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Filing - GGI Holdings LLC (Gold's Gym) 💪

in

GGI Holdings LLC

May 4, 2020

As many talking heads pontificate about whether J.Crew is the canary in the coal mine for post-COVID retail, we have our first fitness-related chapter 11 bankruptcy filing. Is Gold’s Gym the canary in the coal mine for post-COVID gym-based fitness? GGI Holdings LLC and 14 affiliates (the “debtors”) are “…seeking relief under the provisions of chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code to facilitate the closing of certain locations, the rejection of the related leases and contracts and the sale of the remaining business operations on the terms proposed by [non-debtor holding company] TRT Gym Asset Holdings, LLC and its assigns through a confirmed chapter 11 plan.” After recently (permanently) closing 30 locations, the debtors have ~700 remaining locations of which 63 are company-owned and operated. They are owned by TRT Holdings, a Texas-based private holding company that, in addition to Gold’s Gym, owns Omni Hotels. In turn, TRT Holdings is owned and run by Robert Rowling, an American billionaire who made his fortune by working for his father’s oil and gas company — a company that sold to Texaco in the late 80s for hundreds of millions of dollars. If only we could be so lucky.

This is as pure a COVID-19 story as we’ve seen yet. All of the debtors company-owned gyms are closed and a majority of its franchised gyms are too = no revenues and no franchising fees, respectively. The filing is meant to jam those 32 landlords who wouldn’t play ball by way of rent abatements/concessions. The debtors’ pre-petition lenders — big banks like JPMorgan Chase Bank NA, Bank of America NA, and Wells Fargo Bank NA — were unwilling to fund a DIP. The debtors’ pre-petition owner, however, wants to stay in the mix; TRT is offering a $20mm DIP and intends to purchase the company out of bankruptcy. The debtors indicate that they think TRT’s bid will satisfy the big banks, take care of admin expenses, cure defaults under leases the debtors intend to keep and “establish a settlement fund” for general unsecured creditors. The DIP requires a plan on file by mid-May and confirmation by August 1. The timing is predicated upon being ready to open up shop when COVID-exhausted Americans are just about ready to stream themselves back into fourth-tier gyms and take out their longing for “Freedom” on a deep stack of rusty weights. Get pumped b*tches.

  • Jurisdiction: N.D. of Texas (Judge )

  • Capital Structure: $51.3mm RCF

  • Professionals:

    • Legal: Dykema Gossett PLLC (Danielle Rushing, Aaron Kaufman, Ariel Snyder)

    • Financial Advisor:

    • Investment Banker:

    • Claims Agent: BMC Group (*click on the link above for free docket access)

  • Other Parties in Interest:

👕 New Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Filing - Chinos Holdings Inc. (J.Crew) 👕

in

Chinos Holdings Inc. (J.Crew)

May 4, 2020

If you’re looking for a snapshot of the pre-trade war and pre-COVID US economy look no farther than J.Crew’s list of top 30 unsecured creditors attached to its chapter 11 bankruptcy petition. On the one hand there is the LONG list of sourcers, manufacturers and other middlemen who form the crux of J.Crew’s sh*tty product line: this includes, among others, 12 Hong Kong-based, three India-based, three South Korea-based, two Taiwan-based, and two Vietnam-based companies. In total, 87% of their product is sourced in Asia (45% from mainland China and 16% from Vietnam). On the other hand, there are the US-based companies. There’s Deloitte Consulting — owed a vicious $22.7mm — the poster child here for the services-dependent US economy. There’s the United Parcel Services Inc. ($UPS)…okay, whatever. You’ve gotta ship product. We get that. And then there’s Wilmington Savings Fund Society FSB, as the debtors’ pre-petition term loan agent, and Eaton Vance Management as a debtholder and litigant. Because nothing says the US-of-f*cking-A like debt and debtholder driven litigation. ‘Merica! F*ck Yeah!!

Chinos Holdings Inc. (aka J.Crew) and seventeen affiliated debtors (the “debtors”) filed for bankruptcy early Monday morning with a prearranged deal that is dramatically different from the deal the debtors (and especially the lenders) thought they had at the tail end of 2019. That’s right: while the debtors have obviously had fundamental issues for years, it was on the brink of a transaction that would have kept it out of court. Call it “The Petsmart Effect.” (PETITION Note: long story but after some savage asset-stripping the Chewy IPO basically dug out Petsmart from underneath its massive debt load; J.Crew’s ‘19 deal intended to do the same by separating out the various businesses from the Chino’s holding company and using Madewell IPO proceeds to fund payments to lenders).

Here is the debtors’ capital structure. It is key to understanding what (i) the 2019 deal was supposed to accomplish and (ii) the ownership of J.Crew will look like going forward:

Screen Shot 2020-05-04 at 3.38.16 PM.png

Late last year, the debtors and their lenders entered into a Transaction Support Agreement (“TSA”) with certain pre-petition lenders and their equity sponsors, TPG Capital LP and Leonard Green & Partners LP, that would have (a) swapped the $1.33b of term loans for $420mm of new term loans + cash and (b) left general unsecured creditors unimpaired (100% recovery of amounts owed). As noted above, the cash needed to make (a) and (b) happen would have come from a much-ballyhooed IPO of Madewell Inc.

Then COVID-19 happened.

Suffice it to say, IPO’ing a brick-and-mortar based retailer — even if there were any kind of IPO window — is a tall order when there’s, like, a pandemic shutting down all brick-and-mortar business. Indeed, the debtors indicate that they expect a $900mm revenue decline due to COVID. That’s the equivalent of taking Madewell — which earned $602m of revenue in ‘19 after $614mm in ‘18 — and blowing it to smithereens. Only then to go back and blow up the remnants a second time for good measure.* Source of funds exit stage left!

The post-COVID deal is obviously much different. The term lenders aren’t getting a paydown from Madewell proceeds any longer; rather, they are effectively getting Madewell itself by converting their term loan claims and secured note claims into approximately 82% of the reorganized equity. Some other highlights:

  • Those term loan holders who are members of the Ad Hoc Committee will backstop a $400mm DIP credit facility (50% minimum commitment) that will convert into $400mm of new term loans post-effective date. The entire plan is premised upon a $1.75b enterprise value which is…uh…interesting. Is it modest considering it represents a $1b haircut off the original take-private enterprise value nine years ago? Or is it ambitious considering the company’s obvious struggles, its limited brand equity, the recession, brick-and-mortar’s continued decline, Madewell’s deceleration, and so forth and so on? Time will tell.

  • Syndication of the DIP will be available to holders of term loans and IPCo Notes (more on these below), provided, however, that they are accredited institutional investors.

  • The extra juice for putting in for a DIP allocation is that, again, they convert to new term loans and, for their trouble, lenders of the new term loans will get 15% additional reorganized equity plus warrants. So an institution that’s in it to win it and has a full-on crush for Madewell (and the ghost of JCrew-past) will get a substantial chunk of the post-reorg equity (subject to dilution).

Query whether, if asked a mere six months ago, they were interested in owning this enterprise, the term lenders would’ve said ‘yes.’ Call us crazy but we suspect not. 😎

General unsecured creditors’ new deal ain’t so hot in comparison either. They went from being unimpaired to getting a $50mm pool with a 50% cap on claims. That is to say, maybe…maybe…they’ll get 50 cents on the dollar.

That is, unless they’re one of the debtors’ 140 landlords owed, in the aggregate, approximately $23mm in monthly lease obligations.** The debtors propose to treat them differently from other unsecured creditors and give them a “death trap” option: if they accept the TSA’s terms and get access to a $3mm pool or reject and get only $1mm with a 50% cap on claims. We can’t imagine this will sit well. We imagine that the debtors choice of venue selection has something to do with this proposed course of action. 🤔

We’re not going to get into the asset stripping transaction at the heart of the IPCo Note issuance. This has been widely-covered (and litigated) but we suspect it may get a new breath of life here (only to be squashed again, more likely than not). In anticipation thereof, the debtors have appointed special committees to investigate the validity of any claims related to the transaction. They may want to take up any dividends to their sponsors while they’re at it.

The debtors hope to have this deal wrapped up in a bow within 130 days. We cannot even imagine what the retail landscape will look like that far from now but, suffice it to say, the ratings agencies aren’t exactly painting a calming picture.

*****

*Curiously, there are some discrepancies here in the numbers. In the first day papers, the debtors indicate that 2018 revenue for Madewell was $529.2mm. With $602mm in ‘19 revenue, one certainly walks away with the picture that Madewell is a source of growth (13.8%) while the J.Crew side of the business continues to decline (-4%). This graph is included in the First Day Declaration:

Source: First Day Declaration

Source: First Day Declaration

The Madewell S-1, however, indicates that 2018 revenue was $614mm.

Screen Shot 2020-05-04 at 3.58.35 PM.png

With $268mm of the ‘18 revenue coming in the first half, this would imply that second half ‘18 revenue was $346mm. With ‘19 revenue coming in at $602mm and $333mm attributable to 1H, this would indicate that the business is declining rather than growing. In the second half, in particular, revenue for fiscal ‘19 was $269mm, a precipitous dropoff from $333mm in ‘18. Even if you take the full year fiscal year ‘18 numbers from the first day declaration (529.2 - 268) you get $261mm of second half growth in ‘18 compared to the $269mm in ‘19. While this would reflect some growth, it doesn’t exactly move the needle. This is cause for concern.

**To make matters worse for landlords, the debtors are also seeking authority to shirk post-petition rent obligations for 60 days while they evaluate whether to shed their leases. We get that the debtors were nearing a deal that COVID threw into flux, but this bit is puzzling: “Beginning in early April 2020, after several weeks of government mandated store closures and uncertainty as to the duration and resulting impact of the pandemic, the Debtors began to evaluate their lease portfolio to, among other things, quantify and realize the potential for lease savings.” Beginning in early April!?!?

  • Jurisdiction: E.D. of Virginia (Judge )

  • Capital Structure: $311mm ABL (Bank of America NA), $1.34b ‘21 term loan (Wilmington Savings Fund Society FSB), $347.6 IPCo Notes (U.S. Bank NA)

  • Professionals:

    • Legal: Weil Gotshal & Manges LLP (Ray Schrock, Ryan Preston Dahl, Candace Arthur, Daniel Gwen) & Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP (Tyler Brown, Henry P Long III, Nathan Kramer)

    • JCrew Opco Special Committee: D.J. (Jan) Baker, Chat Leat, Richard Feintuch, Seth Farbman

    • Financial Advisor: AlixPartners LLP

    • Investment Banker: Lazard Freres & Co.

    • Real Estate Advisor: Hilco Real Estate LLC

    • Claims Agent: Omni Agent Solutions (*click on the link above for free docket access)

  • Other Parties in Interest:

    • Pre-petition ABL Agent: Bank of America NA

      • Legal: Choate Hall & Stewart LLP (Kevin Simard, G. Mark Edgarton) & McGuireWoods LLP (Douglas Foley, Sarah Boehm)

    • Pre-petition Term Loan & DIP Agent ($400mm): Wilmington Savings Fund Society FSB

      • Legal: Seward & Kissel LLP

    • Ad Hoc Committee

      • Legal: Milbank LLP (Dennis Dunne, Samuel Khalil, Andrew LeBlanc, Matthew Brod) & Tavenner & Beran PLC (Lynn Tavenner, Paula Beran, David Tabakin)

      • Financial Advisor: PJT Partners Inc.

    • Large common and Series B preferred stock holders: TPG Capital LP (55% and 66.2%) & Leonard Green & Partners LP (20.7% and 24.8%)

      • Legal: Paul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison LLP (Paul Basta, Jacob Adlerstein, Eugene Park, Irene Blumberg) & Whiteford Taylor & Preston LLP (Christopher Jones, Vernon Inge Jr., Corey Booker)

    • Large Series A preferred stock holders: Anchorage Capital Group LLC (25.6%), GSO Capital Partners LP (26.1%), Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC (15.5%)

🍦New Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Filing - Ample Hills Holdings Inc.🍦

in

Ample Hills Holdings Inc.

March 15, 2020

“Hey, honey. Things are really tense right now with coronavirus spreading and the market imploding. I could really use some comfort food.”

“How about some of your favorite ice cream?”

“Ooooh, yeah, that’s an excellent call. Ample Hills Creamery has some sick-a$$ flavors. In!!”

BOOM. Bankrupt. Because there can’t be any good news this week, folks.

We know what you’re thinking: the coronavirus has claimed ice cream as a victim. That nasty virus has taken our sweet SWEEEET snack, the godforsaken beast!

But no. What claimed Brooklyn-based Ample Hills — and sent it reeling into chapter 11 bankruptcy — was an off-the-rails expansion. After becoming a favorite darling of A-listers like Bob Iger and Oprah Winfrey, the company experienced a nightmare shared by every New Yorker who has ever tried to do a reno project in their apartment: extensive and ridiculous time and cost overruns. That’s right, this story is ALL TOO FAMILIAR. It’s a homeowner’s lament:

Ample Hills estimated that it would take one year to build out the Factory. In all, it took a full year and a half longer than estimated before the Factory was operational. Ample Hills’ total investment in the Factory was roughly $6.7 million, which was $2.7 million higher than its original budget. Because the Factory delays impacted Ample Hills’ expansion strategy, the Factory has not been as fully utilized as Ample Hills originally planned, which has led to continuing operating losses.

So cliche, folks, so cliche. To finish the build-out and expand shops, the company raised an $8mm Series A round in late 2017 and subsequently expanded to LA and Miami to bring its total to 16 shops in 4 states.

What, on the outside, looked like a lot of successful growth belied the reality: the factory delays were creating significant liquidity problems.

In the 52 weeks ending December 31, 2019, Ample Hills reported approximately $10.8 million in sales and gross profit of $7.5 million. At the store level, Ample Hills’ shops generated positive cash flow. On average the shops generated 15% EBIDTA in 2019. Ample Hills, however, lost approximately $6.9 million during the same period as a result of depreciation, amortization, interest expense, payroll and other operating costs associated with supporting the Factory.

Alarm bells went off. The company went searching for fresh capital but all attempts to secure additional financing fell flat. Thereafter, the company sought a strategic buyer. That, too, failed. This chapter 11 filing is meant to give the company a platform by which to find a bidder (with time funded via a limited duration use of cash collateral). Absent one surfacing, the company acknowledges that it will be left with no choice but to liquidate the business.

  • Jurisdiction: E.D. of New York (Judge Lord)

  • Capital Structure: $3.5mm (Flushing Bank), $1.75mm (SBA Loan), $6.4mm convertible notes

  • Professionals:

    • Legal: Herrick Feinstein LLP (Stephen Selbst, Steven Smith, George Utlik, Silvia Stockman, Rachel Ginzburg)

    • Financial Advisor/CRO: Scouler Kirchhein LLC (Daniel Scouler)

    • Investment Banker: SSG Capital Advisors LLC

    • Claims Agent: Stretto (*click on the link above for free docket access)

  • Other Parties in Interest:

    • Lender: Flushing Bank

      • Legal: Certilman Balin Adler & Hyman LLP (Richard J. McCord)

New Chapter 11 Bankruptcy & CCAA Filing - Pier 1 Imports Inc. ($PIR)

in

Pier 1 Imports Inc.

February 17, 2020

Fort Worth, Texas-based Pier 1 Imports Inc. and seven affiliates (the “debtors”) have fulfilled their obvious destiny and finally fallen into bankruptcy court in the Eastern District of Virginia. Contemporaneously, the debtors filed a CCAA proceeding in Canada to effectuate the closure of all Canadian operations. Color us pessimistic but we’re not feeling so great about the debtors’ go-forward chances in the US either.

We’ve covered the debtors ad nauseum in previous editions of PETITION. Here — supported by an ode to “Anchorman” — we described the debtors’ recent HORRIFIC financial performance and noted how a bankruptcy would be sure to confuse a peanut gallery accustomed to spouting regular (and sometimes inaccurate) hot takes about how private equity is killing retail.* We wrote:

The reaction to this surely-imminent bankruptcy (and, if we had a casino near us, liquidation) is going to be interesting. It is sure to flummox the “Private Equity is Killing Retail” camp because, well, it’s not PE-backed. Similarly it’ll confuse the “You Shouldn’t Put So Much Debt on Retail” cohort because, well, there really isn’t that much debt on the company’s balance sheet. Chuckling in the corner will be “The US is Over-Stored” team … And “The Millennials Aren’t Buying Homes and Furnishing Them With Chinese-Made Tchotchkes” gang (thanks a ton, Marie Kondo) … And the “Management Has Blown Chunks, The Assortment Sucks” bunch … And, finally, “The Amazon Effect” squad….

Over the weekend, The New York Times ran a piece from Austan Goolsbee, an economics professor at the University of Chicago’s Booth School of Business, that — no disrespect to the professor — says many of the same things PETITION has been saying for a LONG LONG time. That is, “The Amazon Effect” is overstated. He argues that “three major economic forces have had an even bigger impact on brick-and-mortar retail than the internet has”: (1) big box stores, (2) income inequality, and (3) the preference shift away from goods towards services. It’s fair to say that these three forces affected the debtors in a big big way.**

Surely, e-commerce has a lot to do with it too. As one PETITION advisor said about the debtors’ wares yesterday:

“You can just order that sh*t online. You don’t need to try it on.”

It’s a fair point.

Another fair point that Mr. Goolsbee omits from his analysis is the role of management. It’s safe to say that the US is suffering from an epidemic of retail ineptitude.

And like the coronavirus, it keeps spreading from one retailer to the next.***

But we digress.

The business has clearly suffered:

From fiscal years 2014 to 2018, the company’s net income dropped from $108 million to about $11.6 million and in fiscal year 2019 Pier 1 experienced a $198.8 million loss.

So, what’s the upshot here? The debtors announced a plan support agreement and intend to use the chapter 11 bankruptcy process to (a) continue to shutter the previously announced ~450 stores (read: get ready for a lot of lease rejections) and (b) pursue a sale pursuant to a chapter 11 plan of reorganization of what remains of the debtors’ business. Frankly, this was masterful messaging: the announcement relating to a plan support agreement and potential plan of…wait for it…”reorganization”(!) head-faked the entire market into thinking this thing might actually be salvageable. That’s where the fine print comes in.

The debtors have dubbed this an “all weather” chapter 11 plan because it provides for either a sale or the equitization of the term loan at the term lenders’ election. This begs the question: will Pathlight Capital LP want to own this thing?🤔 This bit was eye-catching:

“To be clear, the term loan lenders have made no decision at this point, but instead support the process as outlined in the plan support agreement.”

Yeah, we bet they do. Qualified bids will be due on or before March 23 and the lenders have until March 27 to make their election. Which way will the winds blow?

Note that “the process” isn’t currently supported by a stalking horse purchaser. 🤔

Note further that the debtors are required under the DIP to distribute informational packages and solicitations for sale of the debtors’ assets on a liquidation basis to liquidators by March 9.🤔 🤔

It looks like we’ll know the answer very soon.

To finance the cases, the debtors obtained a committed for a $256mm DIP credit facility. The facility includes a $200mm revolving loan commitment and a $15mm first in last out term loan, each provided 50/50 by Bank of America N.A. and Wells Fargo National Association, and a $41.2mm term loan from Pathlight. This was the pre-petition capital structure:

Screen Shot 2020-02-18 at 11.39.07 AM.png

The DIP effectively just rolls up much of the pre-petition debt. There is no new money. The messaging here, then, is also critical: the DIP facility ought to provide customers, vendors and employees comfort that there is access to liquidity if needed. Cash collateral usage, however, is the main driver here: the debtors believe that operating cash flow will suffice to handle working capital needs and bankruptcy expenses.

To summarize, we have another distressed retailer that is scratching and clawing to live. They’ve taken all of the usual steps to extend runway: cost cuts, footprint minimalization, new management. Bankruptcy is a last-ditch effort to survive: the debtors take pains to try and convince some prospective buyer that there is life left in the debtors’ brick-and-mortar business:

The remaining go-forward stores achieved superior sales and customer metrics in the last twelve months compared to the closing stores, including approximately 15% greater sales per square foot on average.

And if that doesn’t do it, there’s the argument that there’s an e-commerce play here. The debtors similarly go to great lengths to state OVER AND OVER AGAIN that e-commerce represents 27% of total sales. They’re practically screaming, “Look at me, look at me! We can be interesting to you [Insert Authentic Brands Group here]!”

Pathlight is sure as hell hoping someone bites.

*Kirkland & Ellis…uh…we mean, the “debtors” appear to agree, stating, in reference to private equity, that “[t]oo many pundits have sought to point in too many wrong directions,” citing pieces in RetailDive and The Wall Street Journal. THAT ladies and gentlemen, is client advocacy!

**It’s also fair to say that Professor Goolsbee does his readers a disservice by neglecting the overall picture which, no doubt, also includes over-expansion, too much retail per capita, private equity and over-levered balance sheets. These cowboys are closing 400+ stores for a reason.

Of course, long time PETITION readers know that we’ve been arguing for a LOOOOONG time that the “perfect storm” hitting retail is a confluence of factors that cannot just be lazily summarized as “private equity” or “The Amazon Effect.” It’s good to see that the folks at Kirkland & Ellis agree:

In the face of the longest bull run in U.S. history (close to 3,000 days and counting), a myriad of factors have collectively changed the ways in which consumers and retailers interact—creating for retailers what is tantamount to a perfect storm—and directly contributing to the struggles retailers face in a shifting marketplace.5

Then it’s as if they lifted this footnote straight out of previous PETITION briefings:

Screen Shot 2020-02-18 at 1.39.17 PM.png

***Not to cast aspersions, but the resume of the current PIR CEO is…uh…interesting: prior experience includes FullBeauty Brands, HHGregg, and Marsh Supermarkets. Any of those names sound familiar to bankruptcy professionals?

  • Jurisdiction: E.D. of Virginia (Judge Huennekens)

  • Capital Structure: $140mm RCF + $47.3mm LOC, $189mm Term Loan (Wilmington Savings Fund Society FSB), $9.9mm industrial revenue bonds

  • Professionals:

    • Legal: Kirkland & Ellis LLP (Joshua Sussberg, Emily Geier, AnnElyse Scarlett Gains, Joshua Altman) & Kutak Rock LLP (Michael Condyles, Peter Barrett, Jeremy Williams, Brian Richardson)

    • Canadian Legal: Osler Hoskin & Harcourt LLP

    • Independent Directors: Steven Panagos & Pamela Corrie

    • Financial Advisor: AlixPartners LLP (Holly Etlin)

    • Investment Banker: Guggenheim Securities LLC (Durc Savini)

    • Real Estate Advisor: A&G Realty Partners LLC

    • Liquidation Consultant: Gordon Brothers Retail Partners LLC

      • Legal: Riemer & Braunstein LLP (Steven Fox, Anthony Stumbo)

    • Claims Agent: Epiq Corporate Restructuring LLC (*click on the link above for free docket access)

  • Other Parties in Interest:

    • DIP ABL Agent: Bank of America NA

      • Legal: Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP, Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP, and Norton Rose Fulbright Canada LLP

    • DIP ABL Term Agent: Pathlight Capital LP

      • Legal: Choate Hall & Stewart LLP (John Ventola, Jonathan Marshall) and Troutman Sanders LLP (Andrew Buxbaum)

    • Ad Hoc Term Lender Group: Eaton Vance Management, Insight North America LLC, Marathon Asset Management LP, MJX Asset Management LLC, Whitebox Advisors LLC, ZAIS Group LLP

      • Legal: Brown Rudnick LLP (Robert Startk, Uchechi Egeonuigwe, Steven Pohl, Sharon Dwoskin) & Whiteford Taylor & Preston LLP (Christopher Jones, Vernon Inge, Corey Booker)

      • Financial Advisor: FTI Consulting Inc.

    • Large Equityholders: Charles Schwab Investment Management, Dimensional Fund Advisors LLP

    • Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors: Bhati & Company, Synergy Home Furnishings LLC, United Parcel Services Inc., Brixmor Operating Partnership LP, Brookfield Property REIT Inc.

      • Legal: Foley & Lardner LLP (Erika Morabito, Brittany Nelson, Timothy Mohan) & Cole Schotz PC (Seth Van Aalten)

      • Financial Advisor: Province Inc. (Paul Huygens, Sanjuro Kietlinski, Walter Bowser, Paul Navid, Shane Payne, Courtney Clement)

📜New Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Filing - SFP Franchise Corp. (aka Papyrus)📜

in

SFP Franchise Corp.

January 23, 2010

Just last week someone from the PETITION team needed to get a card commemorating a family occasion and checked out the Papyrus store in Grand Central Station. It was jam-packed. She then went on to spent $7.99 on a frikken card — something that, it seems, was just $2.99 a few years ago. We suppose there’s a $4 premium for cards that look hand-created yet are mass-produced. Whatever. Anyway, inflation notwithstanding, Tennessee-based SFP Franchise Corp. and its affiliate Schurman Fine Papers filed for bankruptcy this week. Sure, sure, they sell $7.99 cards but at the time of filing, the debtors were down to their last $32k. 😬

This is NOT a story about disruption in the way some might expect. No, electronic cards that literally NOBODY ON THE PLANET OPENS did not destroy this business. At least significantly enough for the company to acknowledge it as a factor. People still dig physical acknowledgements. Instead, this is a story about over-expansion, poor timing, bad deals and over-reliance on one counterparty. In this case, American Greetings Corporation.

The debtors started in 1950 as a greeting card and stationary wholesaler. They expanded into franchise, retail and online over time and the expansion brought on some pain in 2008-2009 (shortly after the company re-purchased franchises). At that time, the debtors engaged with American Greetings as a strategic partner. The debtors sold American Greetings their wholesale business and brand and related trademarks. In turn, the debtors acquired the retail business previously operated by American Greetings — both in the US and Canada (PETITION Note: if you’re thinking, “I thought that brand and trademarks are really the only thing of value for retailers today, well, you’re not wrong.”). Score one for American Greetings here: it dumped its brick-and-mortar retail on the debtors right before the retail sh*tstorm hit. 👍

The deal is special in retrospect. American Greetings agreed to (i) supply the debtors product for an initial term of 7 years, and (ii) provide a royalty-free license of the trademarks for 10 years. In exchange, the debtors agreed to (i) provide fee-generating marketing services for 7 years and (ii) collect and provide point-of-sale data to American Greetings for an initial term of 7 years (for a fee). In essence, the debtors didn’t own or control the product and didn’t own or control the intellectual property. Said another way, this business was dead in 2009: the debtors just didn’t know it yet.

Well, it’s now 2020 and the debtors are, in fact, officially dead. American Greetings pulled the plug in December when it notified the debtors that it was terminating the agreements (citing default under the agreements). Instantaneously, the debtors lost access to product which, in turn, affected revenues.

All 254 stores in the US (178) and Canada (76) will close. 1,100 people are going to need to find new jobs. Trade creditors owed approximately $8mm are essentially screwed. And there will now be more empty boxes in malls. The ramifications of a liquidating retailer cannot be overstated.

The debtors will seek permission to use cash collateral to conduct, with the assistance of Gordon Brothers Retail Partners LLC and Hilco Merchant Resources LLC, an orderly liquidation under chapter 11.

  • Jurisdiction: D. of Delaware (Judge )

  • Capital Structure: $6.675mm RCF (Wells Fargo Bank NA), $10mm LOC (PNC Bank NA), $38.7mm subordinated debt (AG, Carlton Cards Limited, Papyrus-Recycled Greetings Canada Ltd.)

  • Professionals:

    • Legal: Landis Rath & Cobb LLP (Adam Landis, Matthew McGuire, Nicolas Jenner)

    • Financial Advisor/CRO: Mackinac Partners LLC (Craig Boucher)

    • Liquidation Consultant: Gordon Brothers Retail Partners LLC & Hilco Merchant Resources LLC

      • Legal: Greenberg Traurig LLP (Jeffrey Wolf, Dennis Meloro)

    • Claims Agent: Omni Agent Solutions (*click on the link above for free docket access)

  • Other Parties in Interest:

    • Prepetition Agent: Wells Fargo Bank NA

      • Legal: Riemer & Braunstein LLP (Donald Rothman, Steven Fox, Anthony Stumbo, Paul Bekker) & Womble Bond Dickinson US LLP (Matthew Ward, Morgan Patterson)

    • Subordinated Creditor: American Greetings Corporation

      • Legal: Baker & Hostetler LLP (Michael VanNiel, Adam Fletcher) & Saul Ewing Arnstein & Lehr LLP (John Demmy)

🙈New Chapter 11 Bankruptcy - Fred's Inc.🙈

in

Fred’s Inc.

September 9, 2019

Dallas-based Fred’s Inc. and seven affiliated debtors have filed a long-awaited bankruptcy in the District of Delaware with the intent to unwind the business. The debtors are — or, we should say, were — discount retailers with full service pharmacies, focusing on fixed income families in small and medium-sized towns.

The bankruptcy papers — from a law firm largely known for litigation (a curious fact here until you consider that Alden Global Capital LLC is a large shareholder) — are remarkably sparse. No lengthy back story about the company and how “iconic” it is. Just, “it was founded in 1947, sold a lot of sh*t to people who have no other alternative and now we’re kaput.” No discussion of the interim, say, 70+ years. Not a mention in the First Day Declaration of the failed Walgreens/Rite-Aid transaction that would have given Fred’s a larger pharmacy footprint. Nothing about Alden’s stewardship. Nada. Not a word, outside of the motion to assume the liquidation consultant agreement, about the state of retail (and in that motion, only: “The Debtors faced significant headwinds given the continued decline of the brick-and-mortar retail industry.”). Given the case trajectory — an orderly liquidation — we suppose there’s really no need to spruce things up. There’s nothing really left to sell here.* All in, it’s, dare we say, actually kind of refreshing: finally we have a debtor dispensing with the hyperbole.

The debtors started 2018 with 557 locations. After four rounds of robust closures — 263 between April and June and another 178 between July and August — the debtors have approximately 125 locations remaining. Considering that those stores are now closing too and given that the average square footage per store was 14,684, the end result will be ~8mm of square footage unleashed on the commercial real estate market. We suspect that these small and medium-sized towns will have some empty storefronts for quite some time.

The debtors have a commitment from their pre-petition lenders for a $35mm DIP credit facility (which includes a rollup of pre-petition debt).

*The Debtors previously sold 179 of their pharmacy stores to a Walgreens Boots Alliance Inc. ($WBA) subsidiary for $177 million in fiscal Q4 ‘18 and 38 more to a CVS Health Corp. ($CVS) subsidiary for ~$15 million in August.

  • Jurisdiction: D. of Delaware (Judge Sontchi)

  • Capital Structure: $15.1mm RCF (+ $8.8mm LOCs), $20.9mm (Cardinal Health Inc., secured by pharmacy assets), $1.4mm in other secured debt.

  • Professionals:

    • Legal: Kasowitz Benson Torres LLP (Adam Shiff, Robert Novick, Matthew Stein, Shai Schmidt) & Morris Nichols Arsht & Tunnell LLP (Derek Abbott, Andrew Remming, Matthew Harvey, Joseph Barsalona)

    • Board of Directors: Heath B. Freeman, Timothy A. Barton, Dana Goldsmith Needleman, Steven B. Rossi, and Thomas E. Zacharias

    • Special Legal: Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP

    • Financial Advisor: Berkeley Research Group LLC (Mark Renzi)

    • Investment Banker: PJ Solomon

    • Liquidator: SB360 Capital Partners LLC

    • Claims Agent: Epiq Bankruptcy Solutions LLC (*click on the link above for free docket access)

  • Other Parties in Interest:

    • DIP Lender ($35mm): Regions Bank

      • Legal: Parker Hudson Rainer & Dobbs LLP (Eric Anderson, Bryan Bates) & Richards Layton & Finger PA (John Knight)

    • DIP Lender: Bank of America

      • Legal: Choate Hall & Stewart (John Ventola)

    • Large Shareholder: Alden Global Capital LLC

Update: 9/9/19 #19

🙈New Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Filing - Avenue Stores LLC🙈

in

Avenue Stores LLC

August 16, 2019

Retail, retail, retail.

Brutal. Absolutely B.R.U.T.A.L.

Avenue Stores LLC, a speciality women’s plus-size retailer with approximately 2,000 employees across its NJ-based HQ* and 255 leased stores,** is the latest retailer to find its way into bankruptcy court. On Friday, August 16, Avenue Stores LLC filed for chapter 11 bankruptcy in the District of Delaware. Like Dressbarn, another plus-size apparel retailer that’s in the midst of going the way of the dodo, any future iteration of the Avenue “brand” will likely exist only on the interwebs: the company intends to shutter its brick-and-mortar footprint.

What is Avenue? In addition to a select assortment of national brands, Avenue is a seller of (i) mostly “Avenue” private label apparel, (ii) intimates/swimwear and other wares under the “Loralette” brand and (iii) wide-width shoes under the “Cloudwalkers” brand. The company conducts e-commerce via “Avenue.com” and “Loralette.com.” All of this “IP” is the crux of the bankruptcy. More on this below. 

But, first, a digression: when we featured Versa Capital Management LP’s Gregory Segall in a Notice of Appearance segment back in April, we paid short shrift to the challenges of retail. We hadn’t had an investor make an NOA before and so we focused more broadly on the middle market and investing rather than Versa’s foray into retail and its ownership of Avenue Stores LLC. Nevertheless, with the benefit of 20/20 hindsight, we can now see some foreshadowing baked into Mr. Siegel’s answers — in particular, his focus on Avenue’s e-commerce business and the strategic downsizing of the brick-and-mortar footprint. Like many failed retail enterprises before it, the future — both near and long-term — of Avenue Stores is marked by these categorical distinctions. Store sales are approximately 64% of sales with e-commerce at approximately 36% (notably, he cited 33% at the time of the NOA). 

A brand founded in 1987, Avenue has had an up-and-down history. It was spun off out of Limited Brands Inc. and renamed in 1989; it IPO’d in 1992; it was then taken private in 2007. Shortly thereafter, it struggled and filed for bankruptcy in early 2012 and sold as a going-concern to an acquisition entity, Avenue Stores LLC (under a prior name), for “about $32 million.” The sale closed after all of two months in bankruptcy. The holding company that owns 100% of the membership interests in Avenue Stores LLC, the operating company, is 99%-owned by Versa Capital Management. 

Performance for the business has been bad, though the net loss isn’t off the charts like we’ve seen with other recent debtors in chapter 11 cases (or IPO candidates filing S-1s, for that matter). Indeed, the company had negative EBITDA of $886k for the first five months of 2019 on $75.3mm in sales. Nevertheless, the loss was enough for purposes of the debtors’ capital structure. The debtors are party to an asset-backed loan (“ABL”) memorialized by a credit agreement with PNC Bank NA, a lender that, lately, hasn’t been known for suffering fools. The loan is for $45mm with a $6mm first-in-last-out tranche and has a first lien on most of the debtors’ collateral. 

The thing about ABLs is that availability thereunder is subject to what’s called a “borrowing base.” A borrowing base determines how much availability there is out of the overall credit facility. Said another way, the debtors may not always have access to the full facility and therefore can’t just borrow $45mm willy-nilly; they have to comply with certain periodic tests. For instance, the value of the debtors’ inventory and receivables, among other things, must be at a certain level for availability to remain. If the value doesn’t hold up, the banks can close the spigot. If you’re a business with poor sales, slim margins, diminishing asset quality (i.e., apparel inventory), and high cash burn, you’re generally not in very good shape when it comes to these tests. With specs like those, your liquidity is probably already tight. A tightened borrowing base will merely exacerbate the problem.

Lo and behold, PNC declared the debtors in default on July 22; in turn, they imposed default interest on the debtors and initiated daily cash sweeps of the debtors’ bank accounts. Like we said. Suffer. No. Fools.*** The debtors owe $15.2mm on the facility. 

The debtors also have outstanding a subordinated secured note to the tune of $37.8mm. The note pays interest at 15% but is paid in kind.**** The lender on the note is an affiliate of Versa, and per the terms of the note, Versa had continued, at least through April 2019, to fund the business (and letters of credit for the debtors’ benefit) with millions of dollars of capital. 

If this sounds like a hot mess, well, yeah, sure, kudos. You’re clearly paying attention. It’s a dog eat dog world out there. Per the company:

The Debtors operate in an extremely competitive retail environment, facing competition from other specialty-retail stores, including Lane Bryant, Ashley Stewart, and Torrid, and mass-market retailers such as Walmart and Target, many of which are located in close proximity to Avenue stores. In addition to long-standing, traditional competitors within the plussize segment, there has been a recent influx of many other iconic fashion retail brands expanding their range of size offerings into the plus-size range, as well as a proliferation of new entrants targeting this same plus-size fashion market. Due to increased competition, the Debtors have faced significant pressure to maintain market share, which has directly and negatively affected their profitability.

Not that this is anything new. We all know this by now: competition is fierce (Stitch Fix Inc. ($SFIX), Neiman Marcus, Kohl’s Corporation ($KSS), Macy’s Inc. ($M) and others are now going after it hard), B&M sucks because leases carry higher expenses, store traffic is down, blah blah f*cking blah. The company continues:

…changes in consumer spending habits have necessitated many retailers to increase promotional activities and discounting, leading to thinner profit margins. Onerous brick-and-mortar lease terms and increased operating costs, during a period of downturn in the retail sector and deep discounting, have intensified retail losses.

Interestingly, in the face of surging U.S. retail sales in July,***** the company also notes that “a review of historic customer data indicates that Avenue customers are shopping less frequently than they once were….” They blame this on a “[s]hifts in consumer preferences” and the debtors’ emphasis on “fashion basics.” DING DING DING. No wonder customers are shopping there less frequently. “Basic” is the antithesis of Instagram-based retail these days. Basics can be purchased at any big box retailer; basics are now available via Amazon’s private label. Basics don’t create an influencer and, on the flip side, no influencer will market “basic.” Maybe Avenue could get away with “fashion basics” if it had brand-equity like SUPREME and was perceived as a luxury brand. But far from it. 

Speaking of basic, that pretty much describes the go-forward game plan. We’ll lay it out for you:

  • Engage an independent director to explore strategic alternatives;

  • Engage professionals (Young Conaway is legal and Berkeley Research Group as restructuring advisor and CRO)******;

  • Consider whether there’s going concern value, conclude, like, basically, “nope,” and then hire a consultant******* to solicit bids from liquidators for the B&M piece and an investment banker (Configure Partners) for the IP and e-commerce business; 

  • Issue WARN notices, RIF employees, and start shuttering stores (with intent to file a rejection motion on day 1 of the bankruptcy); 

  • Select a stalking horse bidder for the B&M assets from the pool of interested liquidators (in this case, Gordon Brothers and Hilco Merchant Resources LLC); 

  • Continue to search for a stalking horse bidder for the IP and e-commerce (at filing, there wasn’t one yet); and

  • Secure DIP financing (here, $12mm from PNC) to fund the cases while the B&M liquidation transpires and the banker searches under every rock under an extremely compressed timeframe (by 9/24/19) for that e-commerce/IP buyer.******** 

So we’ll know in the next 60 days what the future is for Avenue.

If there is one.

*Let’s pour one out for NJ. The state’s larger retailers are having a rough go of things lately, see, e.g., Toys R Us. The 2,000 figure is updated to reflect a recent round of layoffs. 

**The debtors are located primarily in shopping malls and shopping centers, doing business in 35 states. They have a distribution center for brick-and-mortar merchandise in Troy, Ohio, and a third-party warehousing facility located in Dallas, Texas, which handles logistics for e-commerce. The Troy center is the subject of a wholly unoriginal PE-backed sale/leaseback transaction. The debtors sold the center for $11.3mm and subsequently entered into a 15-year lease with the buyer, RD Dayton LLC. We mention this because sale/leaseback transactions have been getting hyper-focus these days as a tactic-of-choice by private equity overlords to extract returns out of portfolio companies’ assets with any actual value: real property. If you’re wondering why there is very little asset value left for unsecured creditors in retail cases, sale/leaseback transactions are often a culprit. Here, it’s especially egregious because Avenue doesn’t own ANY of its stores: the entire footprint is leased.

The debtors recently closed the Ohio center and transitioned its inventory to Texas and the company already filed a motion seeking to reject this lease (Docket 15).

***This is not extraordinary. Banks do this all of the time when debtors default. A liquidity starved company is almost always toast (read: bankrupt) once this happens. 

****PIK interest means that the interest accrues in the form of additional notes and is not subject to scheduled cash payments. 

*****Per Reuters:

Retail sales increased 0.7% last month after gaining 0.3% in June, the government said. Economists polled by Reuters had forecast retail sales would rise 0.3% in July. Compared to July last year, retail sales increased 3.4%.

******Something tells us that the likes of FTI, A&M and AlixPartners are happy to cede the liquidating retailer market to Berkeley Research Group. 

*******This is one of the more ingenious things to come out of the restructuring market in recent years. These liquidator agreements are so unintelligible that they might as well be written in Dothraki. Hence the need for an intermediary to break out the secret decoder ring and figure out what is actually being contracted for. We don’t know: if something is so woefully incoherent that it requires a separate consultant just to interpret it, something tells us that obfuscation is a feature not a bug.

********If none is found, the liquidator will also get these assets as part of the agency agreement. 

  • Jurisdiction: D. of Delaware (Judge Silverstein)

  • Capital Structure:

  • Professionals:

    • Legal: Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor LLP (Robert Brady, Andrew Magaziner, Ashley Jacobs, Allison Mielke, Betsy Feldman)

    • Financial Advisor/CRO: Berkeley Research Group (Robert Duffy)

    • Investment Banker: Configure Partners

    • Liquidators: Gordon Brothers and Hilco Merchant Resources LLC

    • Liquidation Consultant: Malfitano Advisors LLC

    • Claims Agent: Prime Clerk LLC (*click on the link above for free docket access)

  • Other Parties in Interest:

    • Pre-petition & DIP Agent: PNC Bank NA

      • Legal: Blank Rome LLP (Regina Stango Kelbon)

    • Subordinated Lender: Versa Capital Management LP

      • Legal: Landis Rath & Cobb LLP (Adam Landis, Matthew McGuire)

🤓New Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Filing - Loot Crate Inc.🤓

in

Loot Crate Inc.

August 11, 2019

We’re old enough to remember when subscription boxes were all the rage. The e-commerce trend became so explosive that the Washington Post estimated in 2014 that there were anywhere between 400 and 600 different subscription box services out there. We reckon that — given the the arguably-successful-because-it-got-to-an-IPO-but-then-atrocious-public-foray by Blue Apron Inc. ($APRN) — the number today is on the lower end of the range (if not even lower) as many businesses failed to prove out the business model and manage shipping expense.

And so it was only a matter of time before one of them declared bankruptcy.

Earlier this morning, Loot Crate Inc., a Los Angeles-based subscription service which provides monthly boxes of geek- and gaming-related merchandise (“Comic-con in a box,” including toys, clothing, books and comics tied to big pop culture and geek franchises) filed for bankruptcy in the District of Delaware.* According to a press release, the company intends to use the chapter 11 process to effectuate a 363 sale of substantially all of its assets to a newly-formed buyer, Loot Crate Acquisition LLC. The company secured a $10mm DIP credit facility to fund the cases from Money Chest LLC, an investor in the business. The company started in 2012.

Speaking of investors in the business, this one got a $18.5mm round of venture financing from the likes of Upfront Ventures, Sterling.VC (the venture arm of Sterling Equities, the owner of the New York Mets), and Downey Ventures, the venture arm of none other than Iron Man himself, Robert Downey Jr. At one point, this investment appeared to be a smashing success: the company reportedly had over 600k subscribers and more than $100mm in annualized revenue. It delivered to 35 countries. Inc Magazine ranked it #1 on its “Fastest Growing Private Companies” list. Deloitte had it listed first in its 2016 Technology Fast 500 Winners list. Loot Crate must have had one kicka$$ PR person!

But life comes at you fast.

By 2018, the wheels were already coming off. Mark Suster, a well-known and prolific VC from Upfront Ventures, stepped off the board along with two other directors. The company hired Dendera Advisory LLC, a boutique merchant bank, for a capital raise.** As we pointed out in early ‘18, apparently nobody was willing to put a new equity check into this thing, despite all of the accolades. Of course, allegations of sexual harassment don’t exactly help. Ultimately, the company had no choice but to go the debt route: in August 2018, it secured $23mm in new financing from Atalaya Capital Management LP. Per the company announcement:

This financing, led by Atalaya Capital Management LP ("Atalaya") and supported by several new investors (including longstanding commercial partners, NECA and Bioworld Merchandising), will enable Loot Crate to bolster its existing subscription lines and improve the overall customer experience, while also enabling new product launches, growth in new product lines and the establishment of new distribution channels.

Shortly thereafter, it began selling its boxes on Amazon Inc. ($AMZN). When a DTC e-commerce business suddenly starts relying on Amazon for distribution and relinquishes control of the customer relationship, one has to start to wonder. 🤔

And, so, now it is basically being sold for parts. Per the company announcement:

"During the sale process we will have the financial resources to purchase the goods and services necessary to fulfill our Looters' needs and continue the high-quality service and support they have come to expect from the Loot Crate team," Mr. Davis said.

That’s a pretty curious statement considering the Better Business Bureau opened an investigation into the company back in late 2018. Per the BBB website:

According to BBB files, consumers allege not receiving the purchases they paid for. Furthermore consumers allege not being able to get a response with the details of their orders or refunds. On September 4, 2018 the BBB contacted the company in regards to our concerns about the amount and pattern of complaints we have received. On October 30, 2018 the company responded stating "Loot Crate implemented a Shipping Status page to resolve any issues with delays here: http://loot.cr/shippingstatus[.]

In fact, go on Twitter and you’ll see a lot of recent complaints:

High quality service, huh? Riiiiiiight. These angry customers are likely to learn the definition of “unsecured creditor.”

Good luck getting those refunds, folks. The purchase price obviously won’t clear the $23mm in debt which means that general unsecured creditors (i.e., customers, among other groups) and equity investors will be wiped out.***

Sadly, this is another tale about a once-high-flying startup that apparently got too close to the sun. And, unfortunately, a number of people will lose their jobs as a result.

Market froth has helped a number of these companies survive. When things do eventually turn, we will, unfortunately, see a lot more companies that once featured prominently in rankings and magazine covers fall by the wayside.

*We previously wrote about Loot Crate here, back in February 2018.

**Dendera, while not a well-known firm in restructuring circles, has been making its presence known in recent chapter 11 filings; it apparently had a role in Eastern Mountain Sports and Energy XXI.

***The full details of the bankruptcy filing aren’t out yet but this seems like a pretty obvious result.

⚡️UPDATE: August 18, 2019⚡️

On August 12, we published — and you should revisit — 📦Nerds Lament: Subscription Box Company Goes BK📦, a report on the bankruptcy filing of a company called Loot Crate Inc., an e-commerce subscription service that ships all kinds of nerdy sh*t to dorks who like comics and stuff (PETITION Note: for the record, we’re not making fun of nerds…we’re nerds…we’re just not nerds who subscribe to nerdy e-commerce subscription boxes and collect nerdy lunch boxes, nerdy bobbleheads, nerdy trinkets and super-nerdy action figures…there are levels here, people). While this company is generally a pimple on the U.S. economy’s very large a$$, we think it’s important for our readers — bankruptcy pros, investors, operators, startup/tech enthusiasts — to understand some of the reasons behind its demise: the small to middle market, after all, tends to get short shrift in a sea of bankrupted retailers with a formidable brick-and-mortar footprint or bankrupted oil and gas companies that have shredded public equity and debt value to the chagrin of many an investor. And as if that isn’t justification enough, how can we NOTrevisit this company when there’s THIS summary in its bankruptcy papers:

In short, despite liquidity constraints unlike those I and the Debtors’ other professionals have ever seen, the Debtors have created a path to get through Chapter 11, albeit quickly, to maintain their going concern, reduce the backlog of shipments (and Vantiv’s potential exposure), allow for renewed dealings with valued vendors and licensors, and achieve a result that is the best we could foresee over the last few distressing weeks and months. (emphasis most definitely added).

boom.gif

HAVE. EVER. SEEN. HAHAHAHAHA. Restructuring professionals see a LOT. This is really saying something.

Anyway, to set the mood, let’s start with this choice quote from the company’s filing:

This is a company that has succeeded from ground zero – it is not an “old economy” business, shrinking every year, trying to determine how to remain relevant. Instead, it is the view of the Debtors’ management that once better capitalized and freed from legacy liabilities through the proposed sale of assets in these cases, the Debtors will return to success.

Some might take exception to the use of the word “succeed” here given the company’s current predicament. Just saying. Some might also be forgiven for viewing the conclusions of “Debtors’ management” with a glint of skepticism. Why? Keep reading: we’re about to explain the myriad reasons why this company failed.

First, and this is something that PETITION has focused on considerably over the last several months as digital advertising supply reportedly decreases, prices increase, and more and more DTC brands are seeking targeted eyeballs to sell product. Choice bit here:

By late 2017, the Debtors were having financial issues. The subscription and entertainment market has a healthy and sometimes insatiable appetite for marketing dollars. While the Debtors were very popular with their fan base, the need to continue to spend on marketing was hampering the Debtors’ finances. (emphasis added).

We cannot over-emphasize how critical this is. As more and more B&M retailers underscore their need to leverage social media, influencers, etc., they’ll find it’s not so easy in today’s hyper-competitive DTC environment to generate revenue while avoiding astronomical customer acquisition costs. The upcoming presidential election, meanwhile, might put increased pressure on retailer budgets as Facebook Inc. ($FB), Google Inc. ($GOOGL), and others attempt to limit the number of ads in users’ feeds in the name of “user experience.” Meanwhile, we’ll continue to see both of these behemoths on lists of top 30 creditors: Facebook, for instance, is listed here. Google is one of Avenue Stores LLC’s largest creditors.

All of which is to say that it appears that Loot Crate’s CACs were through the effing roof.

Second, PROGRESSIVES!!! And MAGA!!! The company initially had a distribution system based out of California, “a very high wage stage.” Now the company fulfills “most of their shipments with a third party warehouse and shipper, operating out of Tijuana, Mexico.” We wonder if the facility is wired up with Maxcom tech!?!?

Third, the company blames the Supreme Court’s Wayfair decision (which, for the record, we had highlighted long before the mainstream media) for some of its liquidity problems; it alleges that the decision “require[d] them to accrue sales tax charges for goods sold in the past.” More on taxes below: as a preview, there was seemingly some shady-a$$ sh*t going on here.

Fourth, this company got to experience first hand the dangers of venture debt. Because of the issues noted above, the company ran afoul of its $15mm credit facility with Breakwater Credit Opportunities Fund, an LA-based private investment firm that specializes in direct debt and equity investments in lower middle market companies. The company defaulted on the loan in 2017. This, naturally, gave Breakwater leverage to extract economic concessions from the company and juice their governance rights.

Needing to refinance out Breakwater to avoid Breakwater taking over the board (and presumably tossing the founding management team out the window), the company refinanced the Breakwater loan with a $21mm term loan from Midtown Madison Management LLC, an affiliate of Atalaya Capital Management (MMM also received a now-worthless warrant for 17% of the company’s common stock). Breakwater got out whole, with accrued and unpaid interest, default interest, fees, and repayment of OID provided at the time of default. Savage play by Breakwater. As a condition to the refinancing, the company issued $4.4mm in convertible subordinated notes and warrants to a number of holders, including the proposed DIP lender, the founder’s daddy, and Dendera Advisory LLC (which took notes and warrants in lieu of payment for services rendered in connection with the refinancing). Apparently, only Money Chest LLC, the proposed DIP lender, perfected liens.

The refinancing, while beneficial to Breakwater, did not prove the salvation for the company that it had hoped for. Per the company:

While the August 2018 Financing provided the Debtors with a slight liquidity reprieve, the fees and expenses that had to be repaid to Breakwater made this amount far less than expected, resulting in continued difficulty with vendors after the transaction, resulting in turn in difficulty in filling crates due to missing custom items, causing subscriber chargebacks and cancellations, and then resulting in serious concerns by the Debtors’ credit card processor, and its withholding of funds from the Debtors. All of this caused greater liquidity issues with each passing week and month. In short, the cycle in this unfortunate paragraph never stopped, with each negative event causing other negative events, again and again, and liquidity problems continued into 2019 and until these filing of these Cases. (emphasis added).

Man, these guys give good Declaration. For any business, not just a startup, that paragraph is utterly painful to read.

Let’s break this down: management (1) took an unfavorable deal to refi-out their venture lender and protect their a$$es, (2) quickly realized that, after all was said and done, the company still had severely constrained liquidity, (3) stretched vendors, (4) irritated vendors, resulting in inventory issues, (5) couldn’t ship their product, (6) pissed off customers, (7) sparked credit card chargebacks presumably en masse, and (8) red-flagged their credit card processor to the point that it, too, wanted to run for the hills (more on this below).

Yeah, sure, these guys are totally dependable.

programming.jpeg

Fifth, the company is prisoner to two large creditors. One, Clear Finance Technology Corporation d/b/a Clearbanc, paid the company’s vendors for the company in exchange for a royalty on billings. Clearly this was meant to provide vendors with comfort given the company’s liquidity shortfall. There will be some litigation to determine whether this arrangement is a financing vs. an ownership agreement and, in turn, whether Clearbanc is, by virtue of Clearbanc’s alleged failure to file a UCC-1 perfecting its interest, an unsecured creditor. The other, Vantiv LLC, is the company’s credit card processor and the company’s patsy for why shipments haven’t timely shipped and customers are pissed off. Per the company:

Vantiv has a contingent claim to the extent the Debtors do not ship goods to their customers for which such customers have already paid via credit card. Such customers could then, depending on their credit card agreements and applicable law, reverse or dispute prior charges, which may then have to be returned to the customers’ credit card issuer (and in turn, the customer) by Vantiv. Due to serious liquidity issues over the past months – including Vantiv’s withholding substantial sums to protect itself against this risk – the Debtors’ have over $20 million in customer orders for which the Debtors have obtained payment, but for which the Debtors have not shipped goods….

Vantiv is holding approximately $1.7 million of collections it made for the Debtors and, as of the Petition Date, continues to reserve 100% of the Debtors’ customer billings thereby guaranteeing a continuation of the vicious cycle that has strangled liquidity.

Right. Credit card processors aren’t typically in the business of losing money and they, generally, understand risk. This is what happens when a business starts to spiral: counter-parties who are more than happy to service your account when you’re, say, a high-flying startup ranked at the top of growth lists and featured in Techcrunch, abandon you like you’ve just fallen into a putrid pile of horse manure. Indeed, Vantiv’s threats to terminate credit card processing precipitated the chapter 11 filing: the company simply couldn’t function as an online business without credit card payment processing.

Sixth, we may be reading into things too much but it sure seems like the company engaged in some accounting shenanigans to help with liquidity — switching revenue recognition methodologies while in the midst of its liquidity issues. It helped…maybe…until it didn’t and when it didn’t, the company got pounded in a big big way with a big big outstanding tax liability. In many respects, the bankruptcy filing saves the debtors in this regard: through a customary tax motion and with DIP proceeds, the debtors seek to pay the approximately $5.87mm in back taxes owed. Death and taxes, baby. Death and taxes. Or, more appropriate here, bankruptcy and taxes. But we digress.

Finally, this bit should be a cautionary tale for startups in the e-commerce subscription business:

Unfortunately, the complexity of the transaction, the uncertainty surrounding eCommerce subscription companies, the amount of the Debtors’ funded, trade, and tax debt, and the recent challenges of the Debtors’ operations due to liquidity shortfalls, made it difficult to entice investors. Breakwater was one of the parties interested, and it spent substantial time and incurred costs in mid-July 2019 doing diligence and working on preliminary deal documents. But its interest waned, and sale discussions ceased. (emphasis added)

Riiiiight. Why would that be? Because, like, nobody has figured out how to make these subscription businesses actually work?!? 🤔

It’s telling when the entity that knows you the best and has been through the ups and downs with you wants no part of you going forward. Godspeed, Loot Crate. May the loot be with you.

  • Jurisdiction: D. of Delaware (Judge Shannon)

  • Capital Structure: $15mm credit facility (Breakwater Credit Opportunities Fund LP)

  • Professionals:

    • Legal: Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner LLP (Brian Duedall, Leah Fiorenza McNeill, Andrew Schoulder, Khaled Tarazi) & Robinson & Cole LLP (Jamie Edmonson, Natalie Ramsey, Mark Fink)

    • Independent Directors: Alexandre Zyngier, Osman Khan

    • Financial Advisor/CRO: Portage Point Partners (Stuart Kaufman)

    • Investment Banker: FocalPoint Securities LLC

    • Chief Transformation Officer: Theseus Strategy Group (Mark Palmer)

    • Communications Consultant: Sitrick and Company

    • Claims Agent: Stretto (*click on the link above for free docket access)

  • Other Parties in Interest:

    • Prepetition Convertible Noteholder & DIP Lender: Money Chest LLC

      • Legal: Bayard PA (Erin Fay)

New Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Filing -- FTD Companies Inc.

in

FTD Companies Inc.

June 3, 2019

After the issuance of Illinois-based FTD Companies Inc’s ($FTD) most recent 10-K, everyone and their mother — well, other than maybe United Parcel Service Inc. ($UPS)* — knew that FTD was headed towards a bankruptcy court near you. It arrived.

The company is a floral and gifting company operating primarily within the United States and Canada; it (and its affiliated debtors) specializes in providing floral, specialty foods, gift and related products to consumers (direct-to-consumer), retail florists and other retail locations. The company basks in the glory of its “iconic” “Mercury Man” logo, which it alleges is “one of the most recognized logos in the world.” Seriously? Hyperbole much?🙄

Maybe…not? This, for any sort of history nerd, is actually pretty interesting:

Originally called "Florists' Telegraph Delivery Association," FTD was the world's first flowers-by-wire service and has been a leader in the floral and gifting industry for over a century. The Debtors' story began in 1910 when thirteen American retail florists agreed to exchange orders for out-of-town deliveries by telegraph, thereby eliminating prohibitively lengthy transit times that made sending flowers to friends and relatives in distant locations almost impossible. The idea revolutionized the industry, and soon independent florists all over America were telegraphing and telephoning orders to each other using the FTD network. In 1914, FTD adopted the Roman messenger god as its logo and, in 1929, copyrighted the Mercury Man® logo as the official trademark for FTD.

This company is only slightly younger than Sears (1893). And so this bankruptcy filing is a bigger deal than meets the eye. This company revolutionized flower delivery, regularly innovating and expanding its reach over its decades in business. In 1923, FTD expanded to Britain. In 1946, FTD, FTD Britain and a European clearinghouse established what is now known as Interflora to sell flowers-by-wire around the world. In 1979, the company launched an electronic system to link florists together; and in 1994, it launched its first e-commerce site. In other words, this company always tackled the “innovator’s dilemma” head on, pivoting regularly over time to seize opportunities whenever and wherever they emerged. For quite some time, this was, at least for some time, an impressive operation — seemingly always one step ahead of disruption. WE ALL LIKELY TAKE FOR GRANTED JUST HOW EASY IT IS TO DELIVER FLOWERS THESE DAYS. These guys helped make it all possible. If ever a debtor was in need of a hype man, this company is it. A read of the bankruptcy papers barely gives you a sense for the history and legacy of this company.

okc.gif

Interestingly, for much of its history, the company was actually a not-for-profit. That’s right: a not-for-profit. Per the company:

For the majority of its existence, FTD operated as a not-for-profit organization run by its member florists. With the florists as its core, the Debtors' legacy business provided a powerful mix of a "local," authentic, and bespoke product, broad geographic range, and a commitment to exacting standards of quality and service. Moreover, the Debtors historically were devoted to creating an optimal product for their florist network, including through investment in innovation and technology and marketing the FTD brand and the floral industry overall. As a result, florists sought out FTD membership, and the FTD brand had (and still has) significant caché in the industry.

Amazing!

So what the hell happened? Well, the blood-sucking capitalists arrived knocking. Now-defunct Perry Capital acquired FTD in 1994 (the same year that the company established its web presence) and converted the company into a for-profit corporation. In 2000, the company IPO’d and in 2008, United Online (now owned by B.Riley Financial $RILY), merged with the company in a $800mm transaction consummated just prior to the financial crisis. Then, in 2013, FTD spun off from United Online, once again becoming a publicly-traded company on the NASDAQ exchange.

Throughout the company’s evolution, it pursued a strategy of dominating the floral market via strategic acquisitions (and, in the process, drew antitrust scrutiny a handful of times). In 2006, it acquired Interflora and in 2014, it acquired Provide Commerce LLC (ProFlowers) in a $430mm cash and equity transaction. The purchase was predicated upon uniting FTD’s B2B “Florist” business (read: FTD-to-retail-florists) and B2C (read: FTD-direct-to-consumer) businesses with Provide Commerce’s B2C model in such a way that would (i) offer customers greater choice, (ii) provide the company with expanded geographic and demographic reach, and (iii) promote cross-selling possibilities. Per the company:

…FTD anticipated that the Provide Acquisition would generate significant cost synergies through efficiencies in combined operations.

Ah, synergies. Is there anything more romantic than the thought of ever-elusive synergies?

The company incurred $120-200mm of debt to finance the transaction.** You know where this is headed. If not, well, please allow the company to spell it out for you:

Though the Provide Business Units have increased the Debtors' revenue (the Provide Business Units currently contribute more than 50% of the Debtors' total revenue) … certain shifts in the market, technological changes, and improvident strategic outcomes in connection with the implementation of the Provide Acquisition combined to (a) frustrate expectations regarding the earnings of the combined entity and (b) impair the Debtors' ability to refinance near-term maturities, which has driven the Debtors' need to commence these chapter 11 cases.

That sure escalated quickly. 😬

Let’s take a moment here, however, to appreciate what the company attempted to do. In the spirit of its long-time legacy of getting out ahead of disruption, the company identified a competitor that was quickly disrupting the floral business. Per the company:

ProFlowers had entered the floral industry as a disruptor by reimagining floral delivery to consumers. Unlike the Debtors' "asset-light" B2B business model, ProFlowers took ownership of the floral inventory and fulfilled orders directly through a company-operated supply chain. By sourcing finished bouquets directly from farms, limiting product selection, pricing strategically into the consumer demand curve, and leveraging analytically-driven direct response marketing to generate large volumes at peak periods (i.e., Valentine's Day and Mother's Day), ProFlowers appealed to a broad market of consumers who wanted an efficient order process coupled with lower cost purchases.

There’s more:

In addition to these potential opportunities, FTD also viewed the Provide Acquisition as the means to strategically position itself for success within a changing industry. At the time of the Provide Acquisition, the disruptive impact of ProFlowers was perceived as a threat to traditional business models within the floral industry (and to the Florist Member Network specifically). FTD was concerned that, if it failed to adapt and embrace shifting industry paradigms, competitors would take advantage and acquire ProFlowers to FTD's detriment. Accordingly, FTD effected the Provide Acquisition.

We clown on companies all of the time for failing to heed the signs of disruption. But, that’s not actually the case here. This company was, seemingly, on its game. Where it failed, however, was with the post-acquisition integration. It’s awfully hard to realize synergies when businesses effectively run as independent entities. Per the company:

In particular, a number of key post-acquisition targets, such as (a) floral brand alignment, (b) necessary technological investments in the combined business (e.g., the consolidation of technology/ecommerce platforms), and (c) the integration of marketing and business teams, have lagged. As a result, both the Provide Commerce and the Debtors' legacy brands suffered from internal friction and suboptimal structures within the Debtors' enterprise.

And while the company failed to integrate Provide Commerce, the industry never stopped evolving. Competitors didn’t just take the acquisition as a sign that they ought to fold up their tents and relinquish the flower industry to FTD. F*ck no. To the contrary, this is where…wait for it…AMAZON INC. ($AMZN) ENTERS THE PICTURE:***

While the Debtors struggled to unify their businesses and implement the Provide Acquisition, the floral industry – and consumer expectations – continued to evolve. Following the example set by ProFlowers, other companies began to deliver farm-sourced fresh bouquets directly to customers, increasing competition in the B2C space. In addition, the expanding influence of e-commerce platforms like Amazon transformed customer expectations, particularly with respect to ease of experience and the fast, free delivery of goods. Given the perishable and delicate nature of the product, delivery and service fees were standard in the floral industry. As e-commerce companies trained consumers to expect free or nominal cost delivery, floral service fees became anathema to many customers.

Well, Amazon AND venture capital-backed floral startups (i.e., The Bouqs Company - $43mm of VC funding) that could absorb losses in the name of customer acquisition.

The company also blames a significant number of trends that we’ve covered here in PETITION for its demise. Like, for instance, increased shipping and online marketing costs (long Facebook Inc. ($FB)), low barriers to entry for other DTC businesses (long Shopify Inc. ($SHOP)), and “the growing presence of grocers and mass merchants providing low-cost floral products and chocolate-dipped strawberries during peak holidays” (long Target Inc., ($T), Walmart Inc. ($WMT), Trader Joe’s, etc.).

Collectively, market pressures contributed to declining sales and decreased order volumes, impairing the B2C businesses' ability to leverage and capitalize on scale.

In other words, (a) chocolate-dipped strawberries have no f*cking moat whatsoever and (b) as with all other things retail, this is a perfect storm story that is best explained by factors beyond just the f*cking “Amazon Effect” (the most obvious one being: a ton of debt).

Consequently, the company has been mired in a year-plus-long process of triage; it tried to cap-ex its way out of problems, but that didn’t work; it brought in new leadership but…well…you see how that turned out; it attempted to “reinvent” its user experience to combat its techie VC-backed upstart competitors with no results; and, it sought to optimize efficiencies. None of this could stem the tide of underperformance, bolster liquidity, and, ultimately, prevent debt covenant issues. The company currently has $149.4mm of secured indebtedness on its balance sheet (comprised of a $57.4mm term loan and $92mm under a revolving credit facility). The company reports approximately $72.4mm of unsecured debt owed to providers of goods and services.

In a strange fit of irony, it was the most romantic holiday of the calendar year that spelled doom for FTD. The company’s Valentine’s Day 2018 was pathetic: aggregate consumer order volume declined 5% and, even when people did use FTD, the average order size fell by 3%.

Valentine’s Day 2019 was no better. The company materially underperformed projections again. In addition to constraining liquidity further, this had the added effect of cooling any interest prospective buyers might have in the company pre-bankruptcy.

So, where are we now?

The crown jewel of the company is the company’s B2B retail business. This segment generated $150.3mm in revenue and $42.7mm in operating income in 2018. Operating margin is approximately 30%. The B2C business (including FTD.com), on the other hand, lost $4.6mm in ‘18 (on $727.9mm of revenue) and had -1% operating margin in 2018. (PETITION Note: while these numbers are in many respects abysmal, its fun to think that if they belonged, sans debt, to one of those VC-backed upstarts, they’s probably be WAY GOOD ENOUGH for the company to IPO in today’s environment…flowers-as-a-service anyone?). Clearly, there is nothing “iconic” about this brand outside of the floral network/community.

Anywho, the company is selling the company for parts. On Mary 31, the company effectuated a sale of Interflora for $59.5mm. On June 2, the company entered into an asset purchase agreement with Nexus Capital Management LP for the purchase of certain FTD assets and the ProFlowers business for $95mm. It also entered into non-binding letters of intent to sell other assets, including Shari’s Berries to Farids & Co. LLC (which is owned by the founder of Edible Arrangements LLC, the gnarliest company we’ve ever encountered when it comes to gifts.).

All of which is to say, R.I.P. FTD. We’ll be sure to send flowers. From Bouqs.

*Why are we picking on UPS? It is listed as the largest unsecured creditor to the tune of $23.2mm. Surely they’ll be clamoring for “critical vendor” status given the core function they provide to FTD’s business.

**At one point the papers say, $120mm, at another $200mm.

***We didn’t actually realize this but, yes, of course you can buy fresh flowers on Amazon.

  • Jurisdiction: D. of Delaware (Judge Silverstein)

  • Capital Structure:

    • Secured Indebtedness:

      • $92mm Revolver

      • $57.4mm Term Loan

    • Unsecured Indebtedness

      • $72.4mm of Various Trade Claims

  • Professionals:

    • Legal: Jones Day (Heather Lennox, Brad Erens, Thomas Wilson, Caitlin Cahow) & (local) Richards Layton & Finger PA (Daniel DeFranceshi, Paul Heath, Brett Haywood, Megan Kinney)

    • Financial Advisor/CRO: AlixPartners LLP (Alan Holtz, Scott Tandberg, Jason Muscovich, Job Chan, Bassaam Fawad, J.C. Chang)

    • Investment Banker: Moelis & Company & Piper Jaffray Companies

    • Claims Agent: Omni Management Group (*click on the link above for free docket access)

  • Other Parties in Interest:


🛌New Chapter 11 Bankruptcy & CCAA Filing - Hollander Sleep Products LLC🛌

in ,

Hollander Sleep Products LLC

May 19, 2019

Florida-based private equity owned Hollander Sleep Products LLC and six affiliates (including one Canadian affiliate) have filed for chapter 11 bankruptcy in the Southern District of New York. The debtors are “the largest bed pillow and mattress pad manufacturer in North America.” The debtors produce pillows, comforters and mattress pads for the likes of Ralph Lauren, Simmons, Beautyrest, Nautica and Calvin Klein; their products are available at major retailers like Costco Wholesale Corporation ($COST), Kohl’s Corporation ($KSS), Walmart Inc. ($WMT) and Target Inc. ($TGT) and with the Marriott International Inc. ($MAR) chain of hotels; they have a main showroom in New York City, nine manufacturing facilities throughout the US and Canada, and a sourcing, product development and quality control office in China. Speaking of China, 60% of the debtors’ top 10 creditors are Chinese companies.

Why bankruptcy? Interestingly, the debtors colorfully ask, “How Did We Get Here?” And the answer appears to be a combination of (a) “[r]ecent substantial price increases on materials” like fiber, down and feathers, (b) acquisition integration costs, (c) too much competition in a low margin space, (d) employee wage increases “as a result of natural wage inflation and the tight job market” and (e) too much leverage. The debtors burned through $20mm in the last year on material cost increases alone (it opted NOT to pass price increases on to the consumer), straining liquidity to the point that, at the time of filing, the company had less than $1mm of cash on hand.

With the filing, the debtors seek to restructure approximately $166.5mm of term debt, effectuating a debt-for-equity swap in the new reorganized entity (plus participation in a $30mm exit facility). 100% of the debtors’ term lenders support the plan. As does lender and equity sponsor, Sentinel Capital Partners LLC. That doesn’t necessarily mean, however, that they truly want to own the post-reorg company. Indeed, the debtors have indicated that while they march towards plan confirmation (which they say will be in four months), they will also entertain the possibility of a sale of the company to a third-party. These dual-track chapter 11 cases are all the rage these days, see, e.g., Shopko.

If approved by the bankruptcy court, the bankruptcy will be funded by a $118mm DIP credit facility which will infuse the debtors with $28mm in incremental new money and roll-up the debtors’ prepetition asset-backed first priority credit facility.

The debtors note that “the sleep industry as a whole is both healthy and growing. Market trends favor healthy lifestyle sectors, and the basic bedding segment is generally recession resilient.” We have no quibble with either comment. The company believes that by, among other things, (i) delevering its balance sheet, (ii) gaining access to new capital, (iii) engaging in selective price increases, (iv) implementing material efficiencies, (v) streamlining manufacturing, and (vi) building out their e-commerce channel, it will have a more sustainable path forward. Whether that path will be taken at the direction of their lenders or a strategic buyer remains to be seen.

  • Jurisdiction: S.D. of New York (Judge Wiles)

  • Capital Structure: $125mm ABL ($43mm funded), $166.5mm term loan

  • Professionals:

    • Legal: Kirkland & Ellis LLP (Joshua Sussberg, Christopher Greco, Joseph Graham, Andrew McGaan, Laura Krucks)

    • Board of Directors: Eric Bommer, Michael Fabian, Steve Cumbow, Chris Baker

    • Disinterested Director: Matthew Kahn

      • Legal: Proskauer Rose LLP

    • Financial Advisor: Carl Marks Advisory Group LLC (Mark Pfefferle)

    • Investment Banker: Houlihan Lokey Capital Inc. (Saul Burian)

    • Claims Agent: Omni Management Group (*click on the link above for free docket access)

  • Other Parties in Interest:

    • Prepetition and ($90mm) DIP ABL Agent: Wells Fargo Bank NA

      • Legal: Goldberg Kohn Ltd. (Randall Klein, Prisca Kim) & (local) Orrick Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP (Laura Metzger, Peter Amend)

    • ($28mm) DIP Term Loan Agent:

5/2/19, #2

New Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Filing - Z Gallerie LLC

in

Z Gallerie LLC

March 10, 2019

In January's "What to Make of the Credit Cycle. Part 25. (Long Warning Signs)," we discussed the leveraged loan market and, among many other things, highlighted the then-recent reports that KKR was planning to cut its leveraged loan exposure.

It seems pretty safe to say that this decision was partially informed by KKR's recent experience managing the $2b ex-Blackstone loan fund, Franklin Square Investment Corp. According to reporting by The Financial Times back in December, the Franklin Square fund (now FS-KKR Capital Corp) wrote down five loans between April and December last year. That must be lovely news for investors in the publicly-traded business development corporation ($FSK). Per the FT:

"Executives at Blackstone’s GSO credit arm approved the original loans. But KKR is now responsible for collecting the cash and assessing the loans’ value, and has taken a much gloomier view of their prospects. It has placed 28 percent of the portfolio on a list of deals that require close monitoring or are at risk of losing money, according to securities filings.  

'KKR is a formidable group, but they probably weren’t anticipating the losses that came forth in the GSO book,' said Finian O’Shea, an analyst who covers private credit funds for Wells Fargo."

Strangely, this is obviously good news for professionals with restructuring experience:

"KKR’s credit division has been hiring restructuring specialists to beef up a dedicated team charged with salvaging value from troubled investments — a move that executives there say was planned when the FS-KKR portfolio began to deteriorate. KKR declined to comment, as did the fund’s co-manager, Franklin Square Investments."

Those specialists might get increasingly busy. FSK owned, as of December 31, 2018, first lien loans in Acosta Inc. (written down by the BDC's board to "fair value" from $19.2mm to $11.8mm), Charlotte Russe (yikes), CTI Foods (which was written down by $900k), and Z Gallerie (which had been written down from $31.9mm to $11.3mm). It also owns second lien paper in Belk Inc. (written down from $119.1mm to $94.7mm), CTI Foods, and Spencer Gifts LLC (written down from $30mm to $25.6mm). And subordinated debt in Sungard (written down by 80%). The BDC's equity holdings in Charlotte Russe and Nine West are now obviously worthless. 

Lots of people are focused on BDCs given lending standards during this long bull run. If that portfolio is any indication, they should be. 

*****

Speaking of Z Gallerie, it filed for bankruptcy last weekend in the District of Delaware. It is a specialty-niche furniture retailer that has 76 stores across select states in the US. And this is its second trip into bankruptcy in 10 years. While we think that's too large a spread to really be a "chapter 22," its an ignominious feat nonetheless. 

So another retailer in bankruptcy. We're all getting bored of this. And we're also getting bored of private equity firms helping drive companies into the ground. In this instance, Brentwood Associates, a $2.4b Los Angeles-based private equity purchased a 70% stake in the company in 2014 (and took two seats on the company's board of directors). At the time, Brentwood had this to say about the transaction:*

"Z Gallerie is a differentiated retailer in the home furnishings market with a very unique merchandise assortment. We see a significant opportunity to accelerate growth of the current retail store base."

But…well...not so much. This statement by the company's CRO is a pretty damning assessment of Brentwood's claim that they "build[] category-defining businesss through sustained, accelerated growth”:

"Following a transaction in 2014 in which the Zeidens sold majority control of Z Gallerie to Brentwood Associates (“Brentwood”), Z Gallerie’s overall performance has declined significantly. The reasons for these declines are mostly self-imposed: (i) a store footprint expansion did not meet performance targets, (ii) the addition of the Atlanta distribution center disrupted operations and increased costs, and (iii) the failure to timely invest enough capital in their e-commerce platform limited its growth. These missteps were exacerbated by macroeconomic trends in the brick and mortar retail industry and lower housing starts. As a result, net revenue and EBITDA declined during fiscal year 2018. With Z Gallerie’s current cash balances of less than $2 million, and no availability under its secured credit facilities, the commencement of these chapter 11 cases became necessary to ensure access to capital going forward."

 That's brutal. Something tells us that Z Gallerie is going to make a swift disappearance from Brentwood's website.

Anyway, the company includes all kinds of optimistic language in its bankruptcy filing papers about how, after it closes 17 stores and executes on its business plan, it will be poised for success. It intends to enhance its e-commerce (currently 20% of sales), revamp its Atlanta distribution center, launch social media campaigns (long Facebook), and better train its employees (long Toys R Us PTSD). The company claims numbers have already been on the upswing since the holidays, including February same-store sales up 5% YOY. 

Current optimism notwithstanding, make no mistake: this is yet another instance of value destruction. This is the company's balance sheet (at least some of which dates back to 2014 and is related to Brentwood's purchase):

Screen Shot 2019-03-13 at 9.15.20 AM.png

That $91mm senior secured term loan? Yeah, that's where KKR sits. 

The company has a commitment for a $28mm DIP credit facility from KeyBank which will effectively rollup the senior secured revolving loans and provide $8mm in new money. 

The company has already filed a "hot potato" plan of reorganization — in other words, the lenders will take the company if they have to, but they don't really want to, and so they're happy to pass it on — and have a banker actively trying to pass it on (Lazard Middle Market) — to some other schmuck who thinks they can give it a go. In other words, similar to the plan proposed earlier this year in the Shopko case, this plan provides for the equitization of the allowed secured revolver and term loan claims IF the company is otherwise unable to find a buyer to take it off their hands and pay down some of their loans with cash. The company filed bid procedures along with the plan; it does not have a stalking horse bidder lined up. The company estimates a 4 month timeline to complete its bankruptcy.

We can't imagine that KKR is stoked to own this company going forward. And we can only imagine what kind of projections the company will put forth to convince the court that this thing is actually feasible: the plan has a blank space for the exit facility so that exit structure is also apparently a work in progress.

In any event, given recent loan underwriting standards, KKR, and other BDCs, might want to get used to owning credits they never expected to. 

*Brentwood was represented in the transaction by Kirkland & Ellis LLP, now counsel to the company. The company drops in a footnote that any potential claims against Brentwood and its two directors will be conducted by Klehr Harrison Harvey Branzburg LLP, a firm we’re sure was hired with absolutely zero input by Kirkland and/or the two Brentwood directors. Two independent directors are currently sitting on the board.

  • Jurisdiction: District of Delaware (Judge: Laurie S. Silverstein)

  • Capital Structure: see above

  • Professionals:

    • Legal: Kirkland & Ellis LLP (Joshua Sussberg, Justin Bernbrock, Joshua Altman, Emily Kehoe) & (local) Klehr Harrison Harvey Branzburg LLP (Dominic Pacetti, Michael Yurkewicz)

    • Financial Advisor: Berkeley Research Group LLC (Mark Weinsten)

    • Investment Banker: Lazard Middle Market LLC (Jason Cohen)

    • Claims Agent: Bankruptcy Management Solutions, Inc. d/b/a/ Stretto (*click on the link above for free docket access)

  • Other Parties in Interest:

    • DIP Agent: Keybank NA

      • Legal: Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney PC (Mary Caloway, Mark Pfeiffer)

    • KKR Credit Advisors US LLC

      • Legal: Proskauer Rose LLP (Vincent Indelicato, Christ Theodoridis) & (local) Morris Nichols Arsht & Tunnell LLP (Robert Dehney, Matthew Talmo)

👢New Chapter 11 Bankruptcy & CCAA Filing - Payless👢

in ,

Payless Holdings LLC

February 18, 2019

Update coming on Wednesday.

  • Jurisdiction: E.D. of Missouri (Judge Surratt-States)

  • Professionals:

    • Legal: Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP (Ira Dizengoff, Meredith Lahaie, Kevin Zuzolo, Julie Thompson, Caitlin Griffin, Patrick Chen, Abid Qureshi) & (local) Armstrong Teasdale LLC (Richard Engel Jr., Erin Edelman, John Willard)

    • Legal (Canadian CCAA): Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP

    • Legal (Independent Managers): Seward & Kissel LLP

    • Board of Directors: Heath Freeman, Martin Wade, R. Joseph Fuchs, Scott Vogel, Patrick Bartels

    • Financial Advisor: Ankura Consulting Group LLC (Stephen Marotta, Adrian Frankum, Swapna Deshpande)

    • Investment Banker: PJ Soloman LP (Derek Pitts)

    • Asset Disposition Advisor: Malfitano Advisors LLC (Joseph Malfitano)

    • Liquidators: Great American Group LLC and Tiger Capital Group LLC

    • Corporate Communications Consultant: Reevemark LLC

    • Real Estate Advisors: A&G Realty Partners

    • CCAA Monitor: FTI Consulting Inc.

    • CCAA Monitor

      • Legal: Bennett Jones

    • Claims Agent: Prime Clerk LLC (*click on the link above for free docket access)

  • Other Parties in Interest:

    • Pre-petition ABL Agent: Wells Fargo NA

    • Pre-petition Term Agent: Cortland Products Corp.

🏠New Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Filing - Decor Holdings Inc.🏠

in

Decor Holdings Inc.

February 12, 2019

Source: https://www.robertallendesign.com

Source: https://www.robertallendesign.com

Privately-owned New York-based Decor Holdings Inc. (d/b/a The RAD Group and The Robert Allen Duralee Group) and certain affiliates companies filed for bankruptcy earlier this week in the Eastern District of New York. The debtors state that they are the second largest supplier of decorative fabrics and furniture to the design industry in the U.S., designing, manufacturing and selling decorative fabrics, wall coverings, trimmings, upholstered furniture, drapery hardware and accessories for both residential and commercial applications. All of which begs the question: do people still actually decorate with this stuff?!? In addition to private label product lines, the company represents six other furnishing companies, providing tens of thousands of sku options to design professionals and commercial customers. The company maintains a presence via showrooms in large metropolitan cities in the US and Canada as well as an agent showroom network in more than 30 countries around the world. In other words, for a company you’ve likely never heard of, they have quite the reach.

The debtors’ problems derive from a 2017 merger between the Duralee business and the Robert Allen business. Why? Well, frankly, it sounds like the merger between the two is akin to a troubled married couple that decides that having a kid will cure all of their ills. Ok, that’s a terrible analogy but in this case, both companies were already struggling when they decided that a merger between the two might be more sustainable. But, “[l]ike many industries, the textile industry has been hard hit by the significant decrease in consumer spending and was severely affected by the global economic downturn. As a result, the Debtors experienced declining sales and profitability over the last several years.” YOU MEAN THE PERCEIVED SYNERGIES AND COMBINED EFFICIENCIES DIDN’T COME TO FRUITION?!? Color us shocked.

Ok, we’re being a little harsh. The debtors were actually able to cut $10-12mm of annual costs out of the business. They could not, however, consolidate their separate redundant showroom spaces outside of bankruptcy (we count approximately 32 leases). Somewhat comically, the showroom spaces are actually located in the same buildings. Compounding matters was the fact that the debtors had to staff these redundant spaces and failed to integrate differing software and hardware systems. In an of themselves, these were challenging problems even without a macro overhang. But there was that too: “…due to a fundamental reduction of market size in the home furnishings market, sales plummeted industry wide and the Debtors were not spared.” Sales declined by 14% in each of the two years post-merger. (Petition Note: we can’t help but to think that this may be the quintessential case of big firm corporate partners failing to — out of concern that management might balk at the mere introduction of the dreaded word ‘bankruptcy’ and the alleged stigma attached thereto — introduce their bankruptcy brethren into the strategy meetings. It just seems, on the surface, at least, that the 2017 merger might have been better accomplished via a double-prepackaged merger of the two companies. If Mattress Firm could shed leases in its prepackaged bankruptcy, why couldn’t these guys? But what do we know?).

To stop the bleeding, the debtors have been performing triage since the end of 2018, shuttering redundant showrooms, stretching payables, and reducing headcount by RIF’ing 315 people. Ultimately, however, the debtors concluded that chapter 11 was necessary to take advantage of the breathing spell afforded by the “automatic stay” and pursue a going concern sale. To finance the cases, the debtors obtained a commitment from Wells Fargo Bank NA, its prepetition lender, for a $30mm DIP revolving credit facility of which approximately $6mm is new money and the remainder is a “roll-up” or prepetition debt (PETITION Note: remember when “roll-ups” were rare and frowned upon?). The use of proceeds will be to pay operating expenses and the costs and expenses of being in chapter 11: interestingly, the debtors noted that they’re administratively insolvent on their petition. 🤔

Here’s to hoping for all involved that a deep-pocked buyer emerges out of the shadows.

  • Jurisdiction: E.D. of New York (Judge Grossman)

  • Capital Structure: $23.7mm senior secured loan (Wells Fargo Bank NA), $5.7mm secured junior loan (Corber Corp.)

  • Professionals:

    • Legal: Hahn & Hesson LLP (Mark Power, Janine Figueiredo)

    • Conflicts Counsel: Halperin Battaglia Benzija LLP (Christopher Battaglia)

    • Financial Advisor: RAS Management Advisors LLC (Timothy Boates)

    • Investment Banker: SSG Capital Advisors LLC (J. Scott Victor)

    • Liquidator: Great American Group LLC

    • Claims Agent: Omni Management Group Inc. (*click on the link above for free docket access)

  • Other Professionals:

    • DIP Agent: Wells Fargo Bank NA

      • Legal: Otterbourg P.C. (Daniel Fiorillo, Jonathan Helfat)

    • Subordinated Noteholder: Corber Corp.

      • Legal: Pachulski Stang Ziehl & Jones LLP (John Morris, John Lucas)