🚜New Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Filing - Tea Olive I LLC (d/b/a Stock+Field)🚜

in

Tea Olive I LLC (d/b/a Stock+Field)

The #retailapocalypse is indiscriminate. Sometimes it likes to take down big prey like J.C. Penney or J. Crew but other times it just wants to snag some low hanging fruit via the path of least resistance. That means that a number of retailers those of us in our bubbles in major coastal cities have maybe never heard of will find their way into a bankruptcy court. And a bankruptcy court outside of Delaware or Texas no less.

Like Tea Olive I LLC (d/b/a Stock+Field) for instance. The Minnesota-based “farm, home and outdoor retailer” operates 25 stores across the mid-West. It only sells “a small amount of products…online.” While that’s obviously pretty lame, this place seems like a smorgasbord of fun: in one fell swoop you can go in and pick up, among other things, some dog food, a kayak, some beekeeping equipment, some lawn fertilizer, workwear and apparel, a grill, paint, a new HVAC unit, auto parts, food, toys and firearms! A Christmas bonanza, this place must be! Earl Jr. can get himself a little toy gun while Big Earl can get himself a grenade launcher and AR-15. Everybody wins!

Well, not everybody. Unfortunately, the place is liquidating, a sad post-holidays result for the 1,000 full and part-time employees that work there.

In 2018, the debtor did $176mm of revenue and adjusted EBITDA of $5.1mm. In 2019, to differentiate itself from other unrelated “Big R” entities in the US, the debtor changed its name from “Big R Stores” to “Stock+Field” expecting some short-term drops in performance but expecting those drops to be mere blips on the road to a stronger future. And, in fact, the company did suffer a small drop in performance: it did $173.9mm in revenue and $1.6mm in adjusted EBITDA. 2020 was supposed to be the year.

Spoiler alert: it wasn’t. Not for literally anybody on the planet (well, other than maybe Elon Musk, Joseph Biden, fans of Brexit…ah…you get the idea…there are exceptions to literally everything). Per the company:

In the beginning of 2020, the Debtor continued its rebranding efforts and expected the business to grow throughout the year. However, the Covid-19 pandemic unexpectedly upset all expectations for 2020. All of the Debtor’s 25 stores were open under strict capacity and operating hour restrictions due to the pandemic. Additionally, the pandemic itself has altered the shopping behaviors of the Debtor’s consumers, with some customers not feeling comfortable entering physical stores to shop. While the Debtor sells some products online, the majority of its products are sold solely in stores.

😬Apparently they didn’t get the omni-channel memo. For fiscal year 2020, therefore, the debtor estimates $141.5mm in revenue and -$2.2mm in adjusted EBITDA. Consequently, the company hired restructuring professionals to pursue a financing options and/or a sale. But had no luck. The company then hired Tiger Capital Group to pursue liquidation. Get ready for…

The debtor owes $29.7mm to its senior secured lender, CIT Northbridge Credit LLC pursuant to a credit agreement entered into in early March 2020. Query how seriously the various parties were taking COVID-19 given the timing. Still, the debtor estimates its inventory value to be $45.6mm and it also has $734k of A/R and prepaid assets against $26.5mm in trade debt (inclusive of approximately $1mm in 503(b)(9) claims).* The size of general unsecured creditor recoveries — certain to be less than 100% — will definitely depend on whether there are shoppers out there who are willing to risk contracting COVID-19 simply to hit the bid on that alleged $45.6mm in inventory value.

One question that also arises with retail cases is what happens with gift cards? It appears the debtor intends to honor outstanding gift cards until February 8, 2021. Hurry out, y’all, and get yourself some new toys and firearms just in time for the Civil War.

*For the uninitiated, the Bankruptcy Code provides that suppliers of goods delivered to a debtor in the ordinary course of business in the 20 days prior to a petition date be allowed as administrative expenses.

PETITION is a digital media company that provides curated content, analysis and commentary about distressed investing, bankruptcy and restructuring. We discuss disruption from the vantage point of the disrupted. For “all-access” to our content, lease visit us here.

Date: January 10, 2020

Jurisdiction: D. of Minnesota (Judge Fisher)

Capital Structure: $29.7mm funded secured debt (Second Avenue Capital Partners LLC)

Company Professionals:

  • Legal: Fredrikson & Byron PA (Clinton Cutler, James Brand, Steven Kinsella, Samuel Andre)

  • Restructuring Advisor: Clear Thinking Group (Michael Wesley)

  • Liquidator: Tiger Capital Group LLC

  • Investment Banker: Steeplechase Advisors LLC (James Cullen, Dan O’Rourke, David Burke, Nate Anderson, Eddie Doherty, Amy Rose)

  • Claims Agent: Donlin Recano (Click here for free docket access)

Other Parties in Interest:

  • Secured Loan Agent: Second Avenue Capital Partners LLC

  • Secured Lender: CIT Northbridge Credit LLC

    • Legal: Riemer & Braunstein LLP (Steven Fox)

New Chapter 11 Filing - Herb Philipson's Army and Navy Stores Inc.

in

Herb Philipson’s Army and Navy Stores Inc.

October 8, 2018

Herb Philipson’s Army and Navy Stores Inc., a New York-based outdoor apparel and sporting goods retailer since 1951, filed for bankruptcy in the Northern District of New York.

The company carries various brands like Carhartt, Columbia Sportswear, Levi, lee, Under Armour, Dickies, Timberland and The North Face in its stores (most of which are now the company’s largest unsecured creditors) and also serves as the exclusive retailer for the Utica Comets Hockey Team and the new Utica City Football Club. The company has 9 locations, none of which are in or on company-owned structures or real property. The company had revenues of $43.5mm and $39.8mm in 2016 and 2017, respectively. Through nine months of 2018, the company experienced a dramatic decline in business with revenues of just $15.6mm.

What caused such a stark decline in business? The company notes:

“The decline of the Debtor’s business is directly attributable to a confluence of operational and liquidity factors. Starting in 2015, the Company began to suffer from decreased sales — largely attributable to HP’s inventory mix failing to appeal to the tastes of the market and the rise of e-commerce, which allowed the Debtor’s customers to purchase from on-line retailers the same or similar good being offered by the Company.”

Moreover, the company lost access to its line of credit, necessitating sales of new inventory to finance operations and leaving the company unable to order fresh inventory in Q1 2018.

What followed is a textbook tale of a small brick-and-mortar business trying to make it in a world dominated by upstart DTC brands, Amazon, and bigbox retail. Renegotiations of leases. Headcount reductions. An intensified focus on inventory selection and management. A scramble for new credit which, here, new ownership was able to lock down.

Clearly, however, the terms of the new credit line were either too onerous or too unrealistic as, unfortunately for the company, the new credit facility merely helped expedite the company’s spiral into bankruptcy court. Indeed, roughly a month after entering into the new lending facility, the lender, Second Avenue Capital, notified the company that it was in default under the facility. The relief afforded the company by the cash infusion was, clearly, short-lived.

Consequently, the company filed for bankruptcy so that the “automatic stay” protections of the Bankruptcy Code (section 362) could be leveraged to prevent Second Avenue Capital from exercising its rights and remedies under the credit facility and provide the company with a “breathing spell” within which to attend to “properly restructure and reorganize its affairs and propose a chapter 11 plan that would provide…creditors with meaningful recoveries.”

October 12, 2018 Update:

As is often the case in bankruptcy, there are two sides to every story. In this case, the company’s secured lender, Second Avenue Capital, argues that the company “demonstrated a shocking inability to accurately project the operating performance of the business” leading to “material deviations” to the underwriting-dependent budget. Second Avenue argues, among other things, that (i) the debtor missed its own sales projections by 33.1%, (ii) comparable store sales are projected in the company’s latest budget to be negative 30% and 37% (vs. the underwritten projected positive 5% and 10%) for the months of November and December 2018; and (iii) the company has already missed its own inventory projection by approximately 17.9%. In other words, Second Avenue — while objecting to the company’s motion to use cash collateral — is asserting that they are undercollateralized and that the company is providing inadequate adequate protection.

Notably, Second Avenue doesn’t expressly say that the company was fraudulent in providing the budget upon which Second Avenue underwrote the loan; it does say, however, that “[a]s a consequence of the Debtor’s financial performance…and not any nefarious conduct by the Lender…the Debtor was in substantial and material default” under the credit agreement. Not exactly mincing words. Which only means one of three things: (1) the company was wildly inept in putting together its projections/budget; (2) the company was hopelessly optimistic and otherworldly unrealistic about its projections/budget; (3) the macro conditions for a small brick-and-mortar retailer in today’s day are coming at owners so fast and so furious that projections and budgets, more than usual, are anyone’s guess. We’ll leave it to a court to decide but it sure looks like there may be a contested fight here with the fate of the company in the balance.*

*The first day hearing was scheduled for October 15 but no orders have hit the docket.

  • Jurisdiction: N.D. of New York (Judge Davis)

  • Capital Structure: $2.05mm of secured debt (Second Avenue Capital), $1.5mm secured promissory notes

  • Company Professionals:

    • Legal: Griffin Hamersky LLP (Scott Griffin, Michael Hamersky, Sophia Hepheastou) & Cullen and Dykman LLP (Maureen Bass)

    • Financial Advisor & Investment Banker: Scouler Kirchhein LLC

    • Claims Agent: KCC (*click on company name above for free docket access)

  • Other Parties in Interest:

    • Senior Secured Lender: Second Avenue Capital LLC

      • Legal: Riemer & Braunstein LLP (Steven Fox)