🇲🇽 New Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Filing - Grupo Famsa S.A.B. de C.V. 🇲🇽

Grupo Famsa S.A.B. de C.V.

June 26, 2020

This may very well be the most boring bankruptcy case of all time.

Grupo Famsa S.A.B. de C.V., a Mexican retailer and personal lender with 22 stores and 29 personal loan branches in the states of Texas and Illinois (in addition to 379 stores in Mexico), filed a prepackaged chapter 11 bankruptcy case in the Southern District of New York to basically just refi out a whopping $59.1mm of 7.25% senior notes that were due on June 1 2020. These 2020 notes constitute a remaining stub piece that didn’t participate in an October 2019 exchange offer. In that transaction, the then-outstanding 2020 notes were exchanged for 9.75% senior secured notes due 2024. $80.9mm tendered into that offer. The $59.1mm at issue here … uh … well, clearly … did not.

Holders of the 2020 notes who vote in favor of the plan will get new Series A notes in the same principal amount plus interest and cash in an amount of $10 per $1,000 principal amount of 2020 notes. These Series A notes will pay 10.25% interest and mature in December ‘23.

Those who reject the plan will receive new Series B notes in the same principal amount equal to what they hold (read: no cash payment). The Series B notes accrue interest at 9.75% and mature in December ‘24. All other potential claims against the debtor will be reinstated or unimpaired.

The upshot? It paid to holdout! Those who support the plan and get the Series A notes will get the same principal amount of notes, a higher rate and have shorter duration risk. Well played.

  • Jurisdiction: S.D. of New York (Judge Chapman)

  • Professionals:

    • Legal: Paul Hastings LLP (Pedro Jimenez, Shlomo Maza, Derek Cash)

    • Claims Agent: Epiq Bankruptcy Solutions LLC (*click on the link above for free docket access)

New Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Filing - Jason Industries Inc. ($JASN)

Jason Industries Inc.

June 24, 2020

Wisconsin-based Jason Industries Inc. ($JASN) and seven affiliates (the “debtors”) filed a long-anticipated (prepackaged) chapter 11 bankruptcy case in the Southern District of New York on Wednesday — the latest in a line of manufacturers (e.g., Pyxus International Inc., Libbey Glass Inc., Exide Holdings Inc., Pace Industries LLC) to wind its way into bankruptcy court.

The company is an amalgam of decades of growth by acquisition: it launched its components and seating businesses with acquisitions in ‘93 and ‘95, respectively. Everything appeared to be hunky-dory heading into the Great Financial Crisis when things took a turn for the worse.

And so this isn’t the company’s first rodeo in distress. Back in ‘08-’09, the company engaged in a recapitalization transaction supported by Falcon Investment Advisors LLC and Hamilton Lane Advisors; it persevered through the downturn and ultimately sold to a special-purpose-acquisition-company (Quinpairo Acquisition Corp.) in 2014 for $538.6mm. The acquisition was financed through a combination of (i) the $172.5mm raised by the SPAC in its ‘13 IPO, (ii) rollover equity from the aforementioned sponsors (and management), and (iii) $420mm of first and second lien debt. Stick a pin in that last number: it comes back to haunt the debtors. 👻

In the years since, the company streamlined its operations — selling off assets (i.e., its fiber solutions business and a metal components business) and consolidating around two primary business segments. Through their industrial segment, the debtors manufacture a bunch of stuff used for industrial and infrastructure applications; and through their engineered components segment, the debtors manufacture (a) motorcycle seats, (b) operator seats for construction, agriculture, law and turf care and other industrial equipment markets, and (c) seating for the power sports market. Said another way, the company is heavily indexed to the automotive, heavy truck, steel and construction markets. Powered by approximately 700 employees in the US, the company did $338mm in net sales in 2019.

And that is part of the problem. $338mm in net sales represented an 8.2% ($30.1mm) dropoff from 2018. Adjusted EBITDA declined from $36.7mm in ‘18 to $24.8mm in ‘19. Both segments have been underperforming for years. The question is why?

The debtors cite a dramatic dropoff in demand in ‘19. They note:

This reduction was largely caused by reduced end market demand in key industries across the portfolio, specifically, weak economic conditions in Europe and Asia, lower industrial production in North America, and softening end market demand from OEM customers. For example, since as early as the first quarter of 2019, the Company has experienced reduced OEM build and channel inventory destocking. These problems were exacerbated by the operational disruption and demand reduction caused by the COVID-19 pandemic.

Consequently, the debtors busted out the standard playbook to try and manage liquidity (while parallel-tracking a fruitless pre-petition sale and marketing effort). They (a) intensified focus on growing market segments, (b) reduced capital investment in non-core businesses, (c) cut/furloughed labor and instituted pay reductions for execs and other employees (and eliminated a 401(k) match program), (d) closed plants and manufacturing facilities and deferred rent payments or negotiated reduced rent at leased properties, (e) accelerated the consolidation of plants acquired in a recent acquisition, and (f) invested in automation at their facilities to reduce future operating costs (read: replace expensive human beings) and expand margins. Still, the debtors struggled.

…the pandemic’s impact on orders and revenues, combined with preexisting fixed costs and debt service requirements, have constrained available working capital, reduced profitability and cash flow, and significantly impaired the Company’s ability to adequately finance operations.

Which gets us back to the capital structure:

Screen Shot 2020-07-17 at 9.16.29 AM.png

Given where EBITDA numbers were coming in, this thing’s leverage ratio was through the roof. More to the point, the debtors deferred a March 31 second lien interest payment and had been operating under a series of forbearance agreements ever since. Luckily, the capital structure isn’t all-too-complicated and lends itself well to a prepackaged bankruptcy. And so here we are with a restructuring support agreement and proposed prepackaged plan which will effectively turn the company over to the first lien term lenders and, but for some warrants, wipe out the second lien term lenders. Here’s how the above capital structure breaks down:

Source: PETITION LLC

Source: PETITION LLC

A couple of notable features here:

  • Drop it Likes its Hot. There’s a “first lien put option” baked into the plan pursuant to which any first lien term lender who doesn’t want to own equity or the junior converts can “put” its pro rata share of that equity/converts to a first lien lender, Pelican Loan Advisors III LLC (or lenders as the case may be), which has agreed to backstop this baby. Pelican is managed by Monomoy Capital Partners.

  • F*ck You Pay Me. Those first lien lenders who consented to forbearances all of those months are about to get paaaaaaayyyyyyyyydd. They’ll receive a pro rated share of and interest in $10mm worth of open market purchases by the debtors of first lien credit agreement claims held by consenting first lien lenders AND a forbearance fee equal to 4.00% of the principal amount of the first lien credit agreement loans held by the consenting lenders as of a date certain. The open market purchases were, presumably, accomplished prior to the filing with 2% of the fee already paid and the remaining 2% to be paid-in-kind on the earlier of the termination date of the RSA or the plan effective date.

  • It’s a Trap! Warrants are technically going to be issued to the first lien term lenders and “gifted” to the second lien lenders. But only if they vote to accept the plan. Given the midpoint total enterprise value of $200mm and resultant deficiency claim, this is a nice absolute priority rule workaround. As reflected in the graphic above, the allowed deficiency claim of $64.9mm is obviously impaired and will get a big fat 🍩.

And so this is what the capital structure will look upon emergence:

Screen Shot 2020-07-17 at 9.17.35 AM.png

The first lien lenders have consented to the use of their cash collateral to fund the cases.*

* ⚡️July 15, 2020 Update: The Second Lien Ad Hoc Committee, however, filed a limited objection to the cash collateral motion on the basis that a final order should (a) limit any credit bid to their collateral (noting that a material amount of assets — including 35% of the equity in foreign subs — are excluded from the first lien lenders’ collateral package, and (b) require a finding that there’s diminution of value of the first lien lenders’ collateral such that they, despite providing no new financing, ought to be granted a superpriority lien on previously unencumbered assets. The Committee also previewed objections it will have to the plan of reorganization. For a purportedly “prepackaged” chapter 11, this one looks like it could be more contentious than most. A final hearing on the cash collateral motion is set for July 22, 2020.⚡️


  • Jurisdiction: S.D. of New York (Judge Drain)

  • Capital Structure: see above.

  • Company Professionals:

    • Legal: Kirkland & Ellis LLP (Jonathan Henes, Emily Geier, Laura Krucks, Dan Latona, Jake Gordon, Yates French)

    • Financial Advisor: AlixPartners LLP (Rebecca Roof)

    • Investment Banker: Moelis & Company LLC (Zul Jamal)

    • Claims Agent: Epiq Bankruptcy Solutions LLC

  • Other Parties in Interest:

    • Large equityholder: Wynnefield Capital Management LLC

    • Ad Hoc Group of First Lien Creditors (Credit Suisse Asset Management LLC, Voya CLO Ltd., American Money Management Corp., First Eagle Alternative Credit LLC, Angel Island Capital Services LLC, Monomoy Capital Partners LP, Z Capital Partners LLC)

      • Legal: Weil Gotshal & Manges LLP (Matthew Barr, Ryan Preston Dahl, Alexander Welch)

      • Financial Advisor: Houlihan Lokey Capital Inc.

    • First Lien Agent: The Bank of New York Mellon

    • Second Lien Agent: Wilmington Savings Fund Society FSB

      • Legal: Seward & Kissel LLP (John Ashmead, Gregg Bateman)

    • Ad Hoc Group of Second Lien Lenders: Corre Partners Management LLC, Newport Global Advisors

      • Legal: Brown Rudnick LLP (Steve Pohl, Shari Dwoskin, Kenneth Aulet)

      • Financial Advisor: DC Advisory LLC

Update July 17, 2020

🚘 New Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Filing - Advantage Holdco Inc. (a/k/a Advantage Rent-a-Car) 🚘

Advantage Holdco Inc.

May 26, 2020

Florida-based Advantage Holdco Inc. (along with six affiliates, the “debtors”) is the second car rental business to file for chapter 11 bankruptcy in the last week. The debtors list at least $500mm in liabilities against $100mm-$500mm in assets. Rut roh. They also noted that “[a]fter any administrative expenses are paid, no funds will be available to unsecured creditors.” RUT ROH.

Get ready for the “private equity bros destroyed car rental” argument: Catalyst Capital Group Inc., a Toronto-based private equity firm, owns, through affiliates, 100% of the debtors’ equity after purchasing assets (from The Hertz Corporation as luck would have it) out of the 2014 Simply Wheelz LLC d/b/a Advantage Rent-a-Car bankruptcy and merging it with a subsequent acquisition of E-Z Rent-a-Car in 2015. As powerful as private equity firms tend to be, however, they, despite what some might think, didn’t conspire to shutdown the global economy. By extension, they didn’t have any hand in the pandemic stopping nearly all air travel — affecting, in turn, businesses like Advantage that depend on customers coming in and out of airports (much like Hertz). Nor did they have any control over people deciding not to go visit Las Vegas, Nevada — perhaps one of the gnarliest cities in the world — where Advantage also happens to have certain hotel partnerships it leverages to rent cars to people who want to say…blow sh*t up in the desert. Shocking we know! PE doesn’t control G-d.

Unlike Hertz, Advantage tends to target the leisure-discount segment of the rental car sector. Similar to Hertz, though, it generates predominantly all of its revenue from vehicle rentals (from airports mostly), ancillary products like insurance and navigation services and the wholesale disposition of automobiles previously used in the rental fleet. Sound familiar? Only so much room for creativity in this business model, broheims.

In 2019, the debtors did ~$271.5mm in revenue with $165.1mm attributable to rental and $106.4mm to the other stuff we previously noted. Which just goes to show how much of a money maker that bullsh*t insurance you always debate is.

There’s more bankruptcy Inception at play here: The Hertz Corporation ($HTZ) once owned this company but divested it to avoid antitrust scrutiny. Earlier this week, HTZ filed for bankruptcy. Not it is also involved in this bankruptcy; it is the debtors’ 11th largest general unsecured creditor. Whoops.

  • Jurisdiction: D. of Delaware (Judge Dorsey)

  • Capital Structure: $30.2mm unsecured loan (Aberdeen Standard Investments Inc.)

  • Professionals:

    • Legal: Cole Schotz PC (Justin Alberto, Norman Pernick, Patrick Reilley, J. Kate Stickles)

    • Financial Advisor: Mackinac Partners (Matthew Pascucci)

    • Claims Agent: Epiq (*click on the link above for free docket access)

  • Other Parties in Interest:

New Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Filing - Tuesday Morning Corporation ($TUES)

Tuesday Morning Corporation

May 27, 2020

Dallas-based Tuesday Morning Corporation ($TUES) is 80% open now — just in time to start closing 230 of its brick-and-mortar locations (132 in a first phase and 100 more in a follow-up phase) and commence liquidations sales while in bankruptcy. This, in a nutshell, ladies and gentlemen, sums up the plight of retail today.

If you tune in to CNBC or Bloomberg, one could be forgiven for thinking that a retailer like TUES might actually do relatively well during shelter-in times. It specializes in upscale home furnishings, textiles and housewares for crying out loud. According to the talking heads, everyone is spending time at home judging the inadequacy of their living accommodations — a process that ought to serve as a real boost to home furnishing specialists ((e.g., Restoration Hardware Inc. ($RH)) and home improvement companies ((e.g., Home Depot Inc. ($HD) and Lowe’s Companies Inc. ($LOW)). Not so much for TUES, apparently: the total lack of online presence and the company’s 100% reliance on in-store sales certainly didn’t help matters. The pandemic and related fallout “…resulted in a near-total cessation of new revenue beginning in March 2020.” Repeat: Near. Total. Cessation. Yikes.

Indeed, the debtors’ website serves a very limited purpose: it has a store locator. One literally cannot transact on the site. That said, there does appear to be pent up demand: the company reports that since re-opening its stores on April 24, comp store sales for the reopened stores have been approximately 10% higher than the same period in fiscal ‘19. Perhaps people DID, in fact, identify a lot of things they wanted to remedy at home! And they’re clamoring for that “treasure hunt” experience, y’all!!

What’s somewhat sad about that is, looking at the debtors’ list of top 40 unsecured trade creditors, nearly every vendor they do business with is US-based. In fact, the debtors source 80% of their inventory from US vendors. These store closures and the attendant loss of volume will cascade through the economy. Sigh.

Anyway, we previously wrote about the company in February upon the company’s Q2 ‘20 earnings report. We noted:

Quick coverage of this Dallas-based off-price retailer because, well, it’s performing like dogsh*t. The company reported Q2 ‘20 numbers last week. They. Were. Not. Good.

Nope. Like, not at all. Here are some highlights:

- A 4.1% decrease in net sales YOY driven primarily by a 3% decrease in comp store sales;

- A 3.7% decrease in the size of the average ticket, offset only somewhat by a 0.7% increase in customer transactions (read: more people buying less stuff — not exactly a testament to inventory quality);

- Declining gross margin (down 1.9%);

- Operating income down $5.2mm for the Q and $6.3mm for the 1H of fiscal ‘20;

- Cash is burning, down $6.5mm from June 2019.

The company blamed this piss poor performance on the shortened holiday calendar (how predictable) and uber-competition within that period that resulted in heavy promotions.

We further noted that the company had 175 leases rolling off in the next 12 months and, therefore, “…this is more a lease story than a bankruptcy story.” Whoops. Our crystal ball didn’t pick up on COVID-19. We further noted:

The company has no maturities prior to 2024 and has significant room under its $180mm revolving credit facility ($91.4mm of availability). Still, this thing needs its performance to turn around or it will be dancing with several other distressed retailers soon enough.

“Soon enough” came quicker than we anticipated.

The problem is that not only did the shut-down completely shut the revenue spigot, it also led the debtors to default, as of March 2020, under their revolving credit facility (“RCF”). The RCF Credit Agreement had a provision prohibiting the debtors from “suspend[ing] the operation of its business in the ordinary course of business.” Ever since, they have been in a state of continued negotiation and forbearance with their RCF enders, JPMorgan Chase Bank NA ($JPM), Wells Fargo Bank NA ($WFC), and Bank of America NA ($BAC).

That negotiation has borne fruit. The debtors obtained a DIP financing commitment of $100mm which will consist of some new money as well as a “gradual” roll-up of pre-petition funded debt ($47.9mm + $8.8mm LOCs). The debtors will pay a 2% upfront fee, a 0.5% unused commitment fee and customary letter of credit fees. “The interest rate under the DIP Documents is, either (at the Debtors’ option), (a) a 3 month LIBO Rate (2.0% floor) + 3.00% per annum or (b) CBFR (2.0% floor) + 2.0% per annum, payable on each applicable Interest Payment Date, in cash, provided that no Interest Period may extend beyond the Maturity Date.”

So what now? The debtors main assets are their inventory, a Dallas distribution center and corporate office, and equipment; they also have upwards of $100mm in net operating losses. There isn’t a lot of debt on balance sheet: this is not an example of a private equity firm coming in and dividending all of the value out of the enterprise. Rather, the crux of this case in the near-term will be, as we noted back in February, about the rejection of hundreds of leases and the stream-lining of the debtors’ footprint to a leaner operation. The crux longer-term, however, will be whether there’s any reason for this business to exist. Will the lenders enter into an exit facility? Will there be a plan of reorganization that will allow the debtors to emerge as reorganized debtors? Will there be a sale of substantially all of the assets? The chapter 11 bankruptcy process will be used to hopefully find answers to these questions.

  • Jurisdiction: N.D. of TX (Judge Hale)

  • Capital Structure: $47.9mm funded RCF + $8.8mm LOCs

  • Professionals:

    • Legal: Haynes and Boone LLP (Ian Peck, Stephen Pezanosky, Jarom Yates)

    • Financial Advisor: AlixPartners LLP (Barry Folse, Ray Adams, Wilmer Cerda, JR Bryant)

    • Investment Banker: Stifel Nicolaus & Co. Inc. & Stifel Nicolaus-Miller Buckfire & Co. LLC (James Doak)

    • Real Estate Advisor: A&G Realty Partners LLC

    • Liquidation Consultant: Great American Group LLC

    • Claims Agent: Epiq Corporate Restructuring LLC (*click on the link above for free docket access)

  • Other Parties in Interest:

    • DIP Agent: JPMorgan Chase Bank NA

      • Legal: Vinson & Elkins LLP (William Wallander, Bradley Foxman)

    • Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors

      • Legal: Montgomery McCracken Walker & Rhoads LLP (Edward Schnitzer, Gilbert Saydah Jr., David Banker) & Munsch Hardt Kopf & Harr PC (Kevin Lippman, Deborah Parry)

⛽️New Chapter 11 Filing - Pioneer Energy Services Corp. ($PESX)⛽️

Pioneer Energy Services Corp.

March 1, 2019

San Antonio-based oilfield services provider Pioneer Energy Services Corp. and several affiliates (the “debtors”) filed “straddle” prepackaged chapter 11 bankruptcy cases on Sunday in what amounts to a true balance sheet restructuring. Will this kickoff a new slate of oil and gas related bankruptcy filings? 🤔

The debtors provide well servicing, wireline and coiled tubing services to producers in Texas and the Mid-Continent and Rocky Mountain regions; they also provide contract land drilling services to operators in Texas, Appalachia, and the Rocky Mountain region. International operations in Colombia are not part of the bankruptcy cases. Due to the…shall we say…unpleasant…atmosphere for oil and gas these last few years — which, clearly undermined demand for their services and, obviously, revenue generation — the debtors determined that they couldn’t continue to service their existing capital structure. Alas, bankruptcy.

Hold on: not so fast. We previously wrote in “⛽️Storm Clouds Forming Over Oil & Gas⛽️,” the following:

And so it’s no wonder that, despite a relative dearth of oil and gas bankruptcy filings in 2020 thus far, most people think that (a) the E&P and OFS companies that avoided a bankruptcy in the 2015 downturn are unlikely to avoid it again and (b) many of the E&P and OFS companies that didn’t avoid a bankruptcy in the 2015 downturn are unlikely to avoid the dreaded Scarlet 22….

Sure, Pioneer hasn’t filed for bankruptcy before. But it has been in a constant state of restructuring ever since 2015. Per the debtors:

…in 2015 and 2016, Pioneer reduced its total headcount by over 50%, reduced wage rates for its operations personnel, reduced incentive compensation and eliminated certain employment benefits. In 2016, the Company closed ten field offices to reduce overhead and associated lease payments. At the same time, the Company lowered its capital expenditures by 77% to primarily routine expenditures that were necessary to maintain its equipment and deferred discretionary upgrades and additions (except those that it had previously committed to make during the 2014 market slowdown).

And:

Since the beginning of 2015 through the end of 2018, the Company has liquidated nonstrategic or non-core assets. Specifically, Pioneer has sold thirty-nine (39) non-AC domestic drill rigs, thirty-three (33) older wireline units, seven (7) smaller diameter coiled tubing units and various other drilling and coiled tubing equipment for aggregate net proceeds of over $75 million. As of September 30, 2019, the Company reported another $6.2 million in assets remaining held for sale, including the fair value of buildings and yards for one domestic drilling yard and two closed wireline locations, one domestic SCR drilling rig, two coiled tubing units and spare support equipment.

Annd:

In the first quarter of 2019, the Company continued its cost-reduction initiatives and operational adjustments by expanding the roles and related responsibilities of several of its executive leaders to further leverage their existing talents to the entire organization.

In other words, these guys have been gasping for air for five years.

Relatively speaking, the debtors capital structure isn’t even that intense:

  1. $175mm Term Loan (Wilmington Trust NA)

  2. $300mm 6.125% ‘22 senior unsecured notes (Wells Fargo Bank NA)

Yet with oil and gas getting smoked the way it has, it was still too much. So what now?

The prepackaged plan would give the term lenders cash (from a rights offering) and $78.125mm in new secured bonds (PETITION Note: we’re betting there are a bunch of CLOs here). The unsecured noteholders will get either all of the equity or 94.25% of the equity depending upon what the interest holders do; they’ll also get rights to participate in the rights offering. If the interest holders vote to accept the plan, they’ll get 5.75% of the equity and rights to participate in the rights offering; if they reject the plan, they’ll get bupkis and the noteholders will get 100% of the equity (subject to dilution). General unsecured claimants will get paid in full. Management will put in money as part of the rights offering and an ad hoc group of the unsecured noteholders (Ascribe Capital, DW Partners LP, Intermarket Corporation, New York Life Investments, Strategic Income Management LLC, and Whitebox Advisors LLC) agreed to backstop substantially all of the rights offering (and will receive an 8% premium for their commitment). The cases will be supported by a $75mm DIP. This thing is pretty buttoned up. Confirmation is expected within 45 days.

The end result? The debtors will emerge with $153mm of debt on balance sheet (the $78.125mm in new secured bonds and a $75mm exit ABL). Time will tell whether or not this remains too much.*

*The risk factors here are particularly interesting because all of them are very real. If the oil patch does suffer, as expected, the debtors’ concentration of business among their top three clients (66% of revenue) could be especially troubling — depending on who those clients are.

  • Jurisdiction: S.D. of Texas (Judge Jones)

  • Capital Structure: see above.

  • Professionals:

    • Legal: Paul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison LLP (Brian Hermann, Elizabeth McColm, Brian Bolin, William Clareman, Eugene Park, Grace Hotz, Sarah Harnett) & Norton Rose Fulbrights US LLP (William Greendyke, Jason Boland, Robert Bruner, Julie Goodrich Harrison)

    • Financial Advisor: Alvarez & Marsal LLC

    • Investment Banker: Lazard Freres & Co. LLC

    • Claims Agent: Epiq Bankruptcy Solutions LLC (*click on the link above for free docket access)

  • Other Parties in Interest:

    • DIP Lender ($75mm): PNC Bank NA

      • Legal: Blank Rome LLP (James Grogan, Broocks Wilson)

    • Prepetition Term Loan Agent: Wilmington Trust NA

      • Legal: Covington & Burling LLP

    • Ad Hoc Group of Prepetition Term Loan Lenders

      • Legal: Vinson & Elkins LLP (David Meyer, Paul Heath, Harry Perrin, Steven Zundell, Zachary Paiva)

    • Ad Hoc Group of Unsecured Noteholders: Ascribe Capital, DW Partners LP, Intermarket Corporation, New York Life Investments, Strategic Income Management LLC, Whitebox Advisors LLC)

      • Legal: Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP (Damian Schaible, Natasha Tsiouris, Erik Jerrard, Xu Pang) & Haynes and Boone LLP (Charles Beckham)

      • Financial Advisor: Houlihan Lokey

😷New Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Filing - Hygea Holdings Corp.😷

Hygea Holdings Corp.

February 19, 2020

Florida-based Hygea Holdings Corp. and 32 affiliates (the “debtors”) filed for bankruptcy because…whoa boy…human capital businesses are tough. Hygea is a rollup of physician practices with a primary care physician focus; it also has a management services platform. This is basically WeWork for physicians or Substack for writers: Hygea handles the management activities in such a way that frees physicians up to do what they want to do. Which is be physicians.

The problem is that the debtors expanded too aggressively, acquiring physician practices with minimal net profit. But synergies, right? Not exactly. The debtors’ model didn’t pan out after failing to integrate the underperforming acquisitions. Poor integration fundamentally counteracts the entire point of a rollup, but whatevs. Growth!!

If only things were quite so positive. Per the debtors:

Consequently, the Debtors have been burdened with supporting a number of losing operations, that even with performance improvements will never be profitable. The operating losses of those practices, along with the associated acquisition costs, have caused a substantial drain on the Debtors’ liquidity.

This presents a problem when you have over $120mm of debt. Hence bankruptcy. The company hopes to use the bankruptcy process to solicit a buyer.

  • Jurisdiction: D. of Delaware (Judge Owens)

  • Capital Structure: $121mm secured debt (Bridging Income Fund LP)

  • Professionals:

    • Legal: Cole Schotz PC (Michael Sirota, Felice Yudkin, Jacob Frumkin, Michael Trentin, J. Kate Stickles, Katherine Devanney, Stuart Komrower)

    • Financial Advisor: Alvarez & Marsal LLC

    • Investment Banker: 4Front Capital Partners Inc.

    • Claims Agent: Epiq Corporate Restructuring LLC (*click on the link above for free docket access)

  • Other Parties in Interest:

New Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Filing - Roman Catholic Diocese of Harrisburg

Roman Catholic Diocese of Harrisburg

February 19, 2020

Look. We’ve already written ad nauseum about the use of the bankruptcy system to deal with a deluge of mass tort claimants. For a quick primer on why defendants against heaps of mass tort claims leverage the bankruptcy courts, you can revisit our piece about the Boy Scouts of America here. Many of the same issues at play in that case are relevant to the Roman Catholic Diocese of Harrisburg too. No sense in regurgitating.

With that as a preface, we’ll merely say this: we’re currently confronting an epidemic of immorality and dirtbaggery. Thirty sizable bankruptcy cases have filed this year already and 17% of them are mass tort cases. Three are manufacturers facing asbestos claimants. Then there’s the Boy Scouts and now the Diocese. And it won’t be the last: we have about half dozen other Dioceses that look like they’re headed towards bankruptcy. Zooming out, we can add a utility that knew but did nothing about faulty equipment that sparked wild fires, the US gymnastics team and more to the list. Seriously, folks, what the hell is going on here? If Obi-Wan Kenobi were staring down at the bankruptcy system, he’d pensively say, “You will never find a more wretched hive of scum and villainy.” And he’d be right.

The numbers here tell the tale. The RCDH is confronting 5 civil actions, 200 survivors of childhood abuse, and an unquantifiable number of unknown potential claimants. We can’t wait for the morbid constructive notice that’ll be deployed here: “If you or anyone you know was ever sexually abused by the RCDH, you have a right to file a claim in the RCDH’s bankruptcy case.” That won’t be triggering, nooooooo.

We love how these mass tort debtors frame their bankruptcy filings as an act of justice. Bankruptcy is needed, they say, to ensure the equitable distribution of assets among known and future claimants. Right sure. That’s why these debtors spent decades engaging in cover-ups. Or ring-fencing assets. Because they’re concerned about justice. 👍

Ugh. We’re sick of writing about these deplorable cases. And so we certainly hope the victims get the justice they deserve and get their due compensation. They deserve it.

  • Jurisdiction: M.D. of Pennsylvania (Judge Van Eck)

  • Professionals:

    • Legal: Waller Lansden Dortch & Davis LLP (Blake Roth, Tyler Layne) & Kleinbard LLC (Matthew Haverstick, Joshua Voss)

    • Claims Agent: Epiq Bankruptcy Solutions LLC (*click on the link above for free docket access)

🍎New Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Filing - Earth Fare Inc.🍎

Earth Fare Inc.

February 4, 2020

Screen Shot 2020-02-04 at 1.38.30 PM.png

North Carolina-based Earth Fare Inc. is the latest grocer to descend into the Delaware bankruptcy courts, closing a horrific stretch for the grocery space in which multiple chains — including Fairway Market and Lucky’s Market — capitulated into chapter 11. Signs were out there. On January 26th, we noted that the chain was quietly closing locations, a clear indication of trouble and precursor to bankruptcy. Subsequently, The Wall Street Journal reported that the grocer had begun closing approximately 50 stores. The thing is: it has about 50 stores (across 10 states) so that effectively signaled that the company was kaput. Twenty minutes later, the company confirmed as much, issuing a press release that it would liquidate inventory at all of its stores and pursue a sale of its assets. 3,270 people appear poised to lose their jobs. It’s brutal out there, folks.* But at least sumo mandarins are back, bringing all new meaning to “get them before they’re gone.”

Earth Fare is owned, as of 2012, by Oak Hill Capital Partners III LP (72.1%) and MCP Heirloom LLC (18.76%), an ironic name given that there isn’t expected to be much left of this sucker going forward. Which means that we all should suspect yet another onslaught of “Private Equity Kills X” pieces in the media. Because, like, those have been all the rage lately. See, e.g., The New York Times and Payless, and Slate and Fairway.

So what’s the story? Well, for starters, you know you’ve got a dumpster fire on your hands when the company’s first day declaration to be entered into evidence in support of the filing is a whopping 18 pages long. Clearly the expectations here aren’t particularly optimistic.

Similar to Lucky’s Market Parent Company LLC, it appears that the company took on too much debt and expanded too much, too soon. Ah, private equity. Consequently, it has approximately $76.8mm of funded debt including a revolving credit facility held by Fifth Third Bank and Wells Fargo Bank NA and a term loan with a mysterious “Prepetition Term Loan Lender” that the company was apparently fearful of identifying by name in its papers. Like, for some reason. Like, as if, uh, we won’t find out who that sucker is who dumped $14.8mm into this horror show a mere 6 months ago. In addition to the funded debt, the company owes $60mm in trade and other unsecured obligations.

The company blames its failure on a now-standard lineup of excuses that include (i) crazy amounts of competition,** (ii) significant capex, and (iii) too much debt.

Riiiiight. Back to that debt. The company has been in a perpetual state of amend-and-extend since 2017 when, in May of that year, it secured an amendment/extension of its revolving loan maturity to April 2019. Those private equity bros who are sure to get bashed put $10mm of equity capital into the company at that point. Then in August 2018, the company entered into another amendment pushing out its maturity. In connection therewith, those private equity bros who are sure to get bashed put another $9mm of equity capital into the company. Another extension followed in April 2019 in which those private equity bros who are sure to get bashed put another $5mm of equity capital into the company. They likely would have had more fun just putting all of that money on "black” at the roulette table.

Meanwhile, the company’s efforts to refinance its debt and/or sell stalled badly. It sold 5 underperforming stores but the rest of the company’s inventory will be the responsibility of Hilco Merchant Resources LLC and Gordon Brothers Retail Partners LLC to sell; the sale of its locations the responsibility of A&G Realty Partners LLC; and the sale of the company’s IP, the responsibility of Hilco Streambank. This mandate is raining liquidators!! Toss in legal, a financial advisor and a strategic communications advisor and the question is: is there anyone left to hire to wind down this company?

*Interestingly, The Charlotte Observer reported that “[t]he number of grocery stores in the [Charlotte] metro area has grown by 38% in five years,” a real head-turner of a stat.

** GroceryDive reported:

“They made some strategic mistakes expanding too far into some non-continuous markets,” Burt Flickinger, managing director of Strategic Resources Group in New York, told Grocery Dive. He said Earth Fare’s key markets “were some of the most over-stored on the Eastern seaboard.”

They also note that the pain is pervasive:

Given their large size and market overlap with Earth Fare and Lucky’s, Sprouts and Whole Foods appear to be the main beneficiaries of this round of specialty store closures, sources said. But these chains certainly don’t have it easy. Whole Foods has not returned to profitable growth under Amazon, according to that company’s quarterly earnings reports, while Sprouts’ stock has dropped with the news from Lucky’s and Earth Fare.

“It’s an unforgiving market out there,” Flickinger said.

Indeed!

  • Jurisdiction: D. of Delaware (Judge Owens)

  • Capital Structure: $43.33mm RCF (Fifth Third Bank), $21.67mm RCF (Wells Fargo Bank NA), $14.8mm Term Loan

  • Professionals:

    • Legal: Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, LLP (Pauline Morgan, M. Blake Cleary, Sean Greecher, Shane Reil)

    • Financial Advisor/CRO: FTI Consulting Inc. (Charles Goad)

    • Asset Disposition Advisor: Malfitano Advisors LLC

    • Liquidation Consultants: Hilco Merchant Resources LLC and Gordon Brothers Retail Partners LLC

      • Legal: Pepper Hamilton LLP (Douglas Hermann, Marcy McLaughlin Smith)

    • Real Estate Consultant: A&G Realty Partners LLC

    • IP Consultant: Hilco Streambank

    • Strategic Communications Advisor: Paladin Management Group LLC (Jennifer Mercer)

    • Claims Agent: Epiq Bankruptcy Solutions LLC (*click on the link above for free docket access)

  • Other Parties in Interest:



New Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Filing - American Blue Ribbon Holdings LLC

American Blue Ribbon Holdings LLC

January 27, 2020

Man. The restaurant space is active AF when it comes to BK filings these days. Sysco Corporation ($SYY) must be sweating bullets. On the same day that BL Restaurants Holding LLC (Bar Louie) filed for bankruptcy and a mere week after The Krystal Company filed and less than six months after industry segment brother Perkins and Marie Callender’s filed for bankruptcy, Tennessee-based American Blue Ribbon Holdings LLC and four affiliated entities — the operators of 75 Village Inn and 22 Bakers Square family dining restaurant brands — filed for bankruptcy in the District of Delaware — the 8th significant bankruptcy filing in Delaware in 2020 (far outpacing any other jurisdiction).

This filing may come as a surprise to some. Why? Well, this August 2019 article in the Nashville Post dripped with optimism about the company’s proposed turnaround — a turnaround which included 50 pre-petition store closures. Despite these efforts, the debtors revenues were only $318mm in ‘19, a decline of $36mm.

Unlike BL Restaurants Holding LLC (Bar Louie), the debtors aren’t drowning in funded debt. In fact, they don’t have any secured debt at all. Unsecured claims total only $14mm.

They are, however, drowning due to industry-wide issues. If the factors leading to this filing sound familiar, well…they are:

  • Increased competition in the restaurant business. ✅

  • Increased competition from grocery stores’ expanded prepared meai offerings which, by and large, represent a much better value proposition. ✅

  • Rising labor costs ($2mm hit). ✅

  • Above-market rent. ✅

  • Declining foot traffic due to “an increase in convenience via takeout and delivery at the expense of dine-in customers at restaurants.” DISRUPTION!! ✅

  • Over-expansion. ✅

For all of these reasons, the debtors have been bleeding cash. They lost $11mm in ‘18 and $7mm in ‘19. So, sure, the turnaround was taking hold, it seems, but the $4mm in savings weren’t enough. Indeed, the debtors’ filing was precipitated due to a lack of liquidity.

The debtors will use the “breathing spell” provided by the filing to access $20mm in emergency liquidity (from their indirect ultimate majority owner, Cannae Holdings Inc. ($CNNE)) and pursue strategic options (without a banker….uh…ok, sure).


  • Jurisdiction: D. of Delaware (Judge Silverstein)

  • Capital Structure: N/A

  • Professionals:

    • Legal: KTBS Law LLP (Michael Tuchin, David Fidler, Jonathan Weiss, Sasha Gurvitz) & Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor LLP (Robert Poppiti Jr.)

    • Claims Agent: Epiq Bankruptcy Solutions LLC (*click on the link above for free docket access)

  • Other Parties in Interest:


🍸New Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Filing - BL Restaurants Holding LLC (Bar Louie)🍸

BL Restaurants Holding LLC

January 27, 2020

Another day, another Sun Capital Partnersportfolio company* in bankruptcy. Texas-based BL Restaurants Holding LLC — known to most as Bar Louie — and 3 affiliated entities filed for bankruptcy in the District of Delaware. Bar Louie is a gastrobar concept that operates 110 owned locations plus 24 franchises across 26 states and the District of Columbia. In 2019, it did $252mm of sales, down 3.7% YOY.

We hate to feed into the private-equity-destroys-everything-it-touches-trope but, well, judge for yourself…

The company notes:

Over the past several years, the opening of new locations was the primary driver for sales and profit growth for the Company. This growth was partially funded through new debt, but also utilized cash flow from operations, which ultimately over time restricted liquidity otherwise needed for store refreshes and equipment maintenance and modernization, resulting in inconsistent delivery of the brand promise across the system. This inconsistent brand experience, coupled with increased competition and the general decline in customer traffic visiting traditional shopping locations and malls, resulted in less traffic at the Company’s locations proximate to shopping locations and malls and contributed to sales falling short of forecast. These customer declines were also driven by major changes in consumer behavior, including the general national trend away from casual dining. The combination of these factors had a particularly major impact on a significant segment of the Company’s footprint.

Indeed, all of that growth — coupled with disruptive trends confronting both malls and casual dining — took its toll. Indeed, 38 locations, in particular, really saddled the company. Apparently it’s a bad sign when a third of your footprint has negative same store sale comps of 10.9%. 😬 This brought down the rest of the enterprise (which “only experienced a 1.4% SSS decline.”). Only. The debtors closed the aforementioned 38 locations pre-filing.

What of the debt? The company has $87mm of funded debt, $8mm of trade debt and approximately $6mm of other unsecured debt excluding lease termination claims. Things aren’t looking so great for the trade. The pre-petition lenders have agreed to place a $22mm DIP.

So now the debtors will use that DIP to give themselves time to attempt a sale in bankruptcy. The debtors’ first lien secured lenders and the pre-petition first lien secured agent will serve as a stalking horse via a credit bid. They are owed approximately $56.4mm. Pursuant to the sale motion filed with the court, they seek a 3% breakup fee in connection with the agreement to be the stalking horse which, if you asked us, seems a bit ridiculous under the circumstances. Why do they need a breakup fee at all when they’re trying to shed this turd? Do they really want to own this business? A multi-month pre-petition marketing campaign would seem to indicate otherwise. This reeks of greed and ought to spark an objection from creditors who will be hoping there’s some buyer who comes out of the wood work and overbids for this thing.

We wouldn’t bet on it.

*The debtors’ first day declaration only refers to its private equity sponsors as “its current owners”. While it’s not entirely clear from the bankruptcy papers, it appears that Sun Capital may also be the second lien lender agent here (and lenders) — a presumption that is bolstered by the appearance of Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLP as counsel. Morgan Lewis has represented Sun Capital portfolio companies in a number of recent chapter 11 bankruptcy filings. Curious how, with one exception, there was virtually no mention of Sun Capital’s involvement in any of the papers.

  • Jurisdiction: D. of Delaware (Judge Walrath)

  • Capital Structure: $42mm Term Loan + $14.4mm RCF (Antares Capital LP), $23.6mm second lien debt (BL Restaurants Group Holding Corp.)

  • Professionals:

    • Legal: Klehr Harrison Harvey Branzburg LLP (Domenic Pacitti, Michael Yurkewicz)

    • Financial Advisor/CRO: Carl Marks Advisory Group LLC (Howard Meitiner)

    • Investment Banker: Configure Partners LLC (Vin Batra)

    • Claims Agent: Epiq Bankruptcy Solutions LLC (*click on the link above for free docket access)

  • Other Parties in Interest:

    • Prepetition First Lien Secured Agent and DIP Agent: Antares Capital LP

      • Legal: Latham & Watkins LLP (James Ktsanes, Jeremy Webb) & Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor LLP (Michael Nestor, Andrew Magaziner)

    • DIP Lenders: Midcap Funding XVI Trust, Midcap Funding XXX Trust, Midcap Financial Trust, Woodmont 2017-2 Trust, Woodmont 2017-3 LP, Woodmont 2018-4 Trust

    • Prepetition Second Lien Agent:

      • Legal: Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLP (Barbara Shander)

    • Purchaser: BLH Acquisition Co., LLC

🌿New Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Filing - GenCanna Global USA Inc.🌿

GenCanna Global USA Inc.

January 24, 2020

Cannabis companies may not have access to federal bankruptcy courts but vertically-integrated agtech companies that develop federally-legal hemp-derived cannabinoid products like CBD sure do. 👍

Now, we know what you’re thinking: CBD is all the rage, everyone is talking about it, everyone — even Nana — is using it, and everyone is infusing it in their products, so how the hell could an “industry pioneer” in the space end up in bankruptcy court?!? Sh*t. We have a whole bin of it in the corner of our WeWork office, just under where the beer used to be. In fact, we collectively drank some and rubbed some all over our bodies in a team building exercise just prior to righting and editting this peace so that’s a very fair question.

The companies troubles include:

  • An inability to find a strategic partner or find a banker — in the age of WeWork — that would carry the company through a capital-raising IPO.

  • Consummate a transaction with a public-traded strategic with a hyper-inflated stock price of its own (callback to the epic rise of weed stock values) prior to reality set in.

  • A fire at a production facility. How ironic.

  • A contract dispute with a contractor working on a new hemp processing facility. How trite.

  • An inability to find proper “financial leadership.” Apparently, the lenders were unimpressed with the company’s chosen CFO and then required the retention of Huron Consulting Group which then led to the sh*tcanning of the CFO which then led to that CFO claiming that there was fraud on the books which then led to an investigation which then concluded that it was all just “psyche, I’m just a sore loser” and….damn this CBD feels good. How could there be drama like this when everyone has this sh*t tingling all over their body?

  • Fights with farmers who didn’t get their fixed payments after the company’s sales did not materialize as projected. Ah, projections.

  • A price collapse. Per the company, “Beginning in the summer of 2019, pricing in the industry plummeted across all CBD product categories. By the end of the year and through today, bulk product prices in nearly all categories have dropped by as much as 80%. This dramatic plunge in pricing also correlated to the large drop in the public capital markets for cannabis companies in both the US and Canada.” Apparently the fact that this sh*t is easy to produce and popped everywhere in basically 1.2 seconds is not good for pricing. Who knew?

  • A lack of regulatory clarity about the status of hemp-derived products has delayed investment and development of products. Or so they say. Seems like everyone under the sun has some CBD-infused product at this point, but whatever. We’ll take this at face value.

Of course, the biggest trouble was probably the involuntary chapter 11 petition filed against the company by three creditors. But, in the spirit of making lemonade, the company will take advantage of the opportunity to convert the company to a voluntary 11 and use the benefit of the automatic stay obtain some much-needed liquidity in the form of a $10mm DIP credit facility and figure out a path forward.


  • Jurisdiction: E.D. of Kentucky (Judge Schaaf)

  • Capital Structure: $68.5mm Term Loans (MGG Investment Group LP)

  • Professionals:

    • Legal: Benesch Friedlander Coplan & Aronoff LLP (Michael Barrie, Jennifer Hoover, Elliot Smith) & Dentons Bingham Greenebaum LLP (James Irving, April Wimberg, Christopher Madden)

    • Financial Advisor: Huron Consulting Group (James Alt, Marc Passalacqua, Benjamin Smith)

    • Investment Banker: Jefferies Group LLC

    • Claims Agent: Epiq Bankruptcy Solutions LLC (*click on the link above for free docket access)

  • Other Parties in Interest:

    • Prepetition Lender: MGG Investment Group LP

      • Legal: Schulte Roth & Zabel (Kristine Manoukian, Adam Harris) & Fowler Bell PLLC (Taft McKinstry, Christopher Colson)

New Chapter 11 Filing - DBMP LLC

DBMP LLC

January 23, 2020

Let’s just deem January 2020 “Asbestos Month.” The end.

  • Jurisdiction: W.D. of North Carolina (Judge Whitley)

  • Professionals:

    • Legal: Jones Day (Gregory Gordon, Amanda Rush, Jeffrey Ellman, Danielle Barav-Johnson) & Robinson Bradshaw & Hinson PA (Garland Cassada, David Schilli, Andrew Tarr)

    • CRO: Robert J. Panaro

    • Claims Agent: Epiq Bankruptcy Solutions LLC (*click on the link above for free docket access)

😷New Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Filing - Walker County Hospital Corporation (d/b/a Huntsville Memorial Hospital)😷

Walker County Hospital Corporation (d/b/a Huntsville Memorial Hospital)

November 11, 2019

Walker County Hospital Corporation (“WCHC,” d/b/a Huntsville Memorial Hospital) is the latest in a recent string of healthcare bankruptcies. Why?

Per the debtor:

“While the Hospital has outpaced market trends in the region for admissions and revenue, and has little outstanding long-term debt, as a standalone hospital operator, the Debtor faces significant challenges in acquiring competitive pricing for necessary goods and services and favorable managed care contracts as compared to multi-hospital systems.”

If you’re wondering about why private equity firms are rolling-up hospital systems, this ⬆️ ought to give you some perspective.

“As a result, the Hospital has significantly above average operating costs that exceed its revenue generation.”

That, ladies and gentlemen, is what you call a lack of economies of scale.

“In addition, the Debtor’s over-extension into rural healthcare clinics and a failed lab venture and ambulatory surgery center, among other issues, have resulted in an unsustainable balance sheet and liquidity.”

So, uh, that all sucks.

Interestingly, the State of Texas helped bury the debtor:

In 2018, the State of Texas shifted its health insurance coverage for state employees from United Healthcare to Blue Cross Blue Shield. This shift materially impacted the Debtor’s revenue, as the Debtor’s contract with Blue Cross Blue Shield has less favorable reimbursement rates and a large portion of the Hospital’s patient population is employed by the State. The Debtor has been in negotiations with Blue Cross Blue Shield since 2016, in an attempt to obtain a managed care contract with the insurer at a fair market rate, but efforts thus far have remained unsuccessful.

Because of this and other issues, the debtor’s revenue dipped and it tripped covenants in its pre-petition credit facility AND defaulted under its operating agreements with the Walker County Hospital District. The debtor has been operating under forbearance agreements with both for some time now while it sought to find a buyer. It failed. This bankruptcy is intended to provide one chance for such a sale: the debtor already has a sale process motion on the docket. It does not have a stalking horse purchaser, it does have some hope that the District will be a participant in an auction. To allow that process to play out, the debtor obtained a $5mm DIP credit facility commitment from its pre-petition (direct) lender, MidCap Financial Trust.

  • Jurisdiction: S.D. of Texas (Judge Jones)

  • Capital Structure: $2mm RCF (MidCap Financial Trust)

  • Professionals:

    • Legal: Waller Lansden Dortch & Davis, LLP (Ryan Cochran, Blake Roth, Tyler Layne, Andrea Cunha, Evan Atkinson)

    • Financial Advisor: Healthcare Management Partners LLC (Steven Smith)

    • Claims Agent: Epiq Corporate Restructuring LLC (*click on the link above for free docket access)

  • Other Parties in Interest:

    • DIP Lender: MidCap Financial Trust

      • Legal: Vedder Price P.C. (Michael Eidelman, David Kane) & Porter Hodges LLP (John Higgins, Kiran Vakamudi)

🥛New Chapter 11 Filing - Southern Foods Group LLC (d/b/a Dean Foods Company)🥛

We’ve published these charts before here but they’re worth revisiting:

Since we’re all about the charts right now, here’s another one — perhaps the ugliest of them all:

Screen Shot 2020-01-11 at 11.28.49 AM.png

Yup, Southern Foods Group LLC (d/b/a Dean Foods Company) has been a slow-moving train wreck for some time now. In fact, we wrote about the disruption it confronts back in March. It’s worth revisiting (we removed the paywall).

Alas, the company and a long list of subsidiaries finally filed for bankruptcy yesterday in the Texas (where things seem to be getting VERRRRRY VERRRRRY busy these days; see below ⬇️).

Once upon a time everyone had milk. Serena and Venus Williams. Dwight Howard. Mark McGuire. Tyra Banks. The Olsen twins. David Beckham. Giselle. The “Got Milk? campaign was pervasive, featuring A-listers encouraging folks to drink milk for strong bones. Things have certainly changed.

Dean Foods’ long history begins in 1925; it manufactures, markets and distributes branded and private label dairy products including milks, ice cream, creamers, etc. It distributes product to schools, QSRs like McDonald’s Inc. ($MCD), small format retailers (i.e., dollar stores and pharmacies), big box retailers like Walmart Inc. ($WMT)(which accounted for 15.3% of net sales in ‘18), and the government. Its products include, among many others, Friendly’sLand O Lakes and Organic Valley. This company is a monster: it has 58 manufacturing facilities in 29 states, 5000 refrigerated trucks and 15,000 employees (40% of whom are covered by collective bargaining agreements). Milk, while on the decline, remains big business.

How big? Per the company:

In 2018, Dean Foods’ reported consolidated net sales of $7.755 billion, gross profit of $1.655 billion, and operating income of $(315.2) million. Through the first 6 months of 2019, Dean Foods’ reported consolidated net sales of $3.931 billion, gross profit of $753.2 million, and operating income of $(96.2) million.

Those are some serious sales. And losses. And the company also has a serious capital structure:

Screen Shot 2020-01-11 at 11.31.29 AM.png

Milk production is a capital intensive business requiring a variety of inputs: raw milk, resin to make plastic bottles (which likely infuse all of us with dangerous chemicals, but whatevs), diesel fuel, and juice concentrates and sweeteners. Hence, high debt. So, to summarize: high costs, low(er) demand, lots of debt? No wonder this thing is in trouble.

What are the stated reasons for the company’s chapter 11 filing?

  • Milk Consumption Declines. “For the past 10 years, demand has fallen approximately 2% year-over-year in North America.” This is consistent with the chart above.

  • Loss of Pricing Power. Because volumes declined, economies of scale also decreased. “Delivered cost per gallon rose approximately 20.7% between 2018 and 2013 as a result of volume deleverage.” That’s vicious. Talk about a mean spiral: as volumes went down, the company couldn’t support the input volumes it had previously and therefore lost pricing power. “Dean Foods suffered a full year 2018 year-over-year decline in fluid milk volume of 5.8% following a 2017 year-over-year decline of 4.2%. Moreover, Dean Foods’ volume declines continue to outpace the overall category; while category volumes declined by approximately 4%8 year-over-year through the end of September, 2019, Dean Foods experience declines of over 11.4%.” Apparently, this impacted Dean Foods disproportionately. Any buyer looking at this has to wonder how these issues can be remedied.

  • Market Share Disruption. New forms of “milk” have taken market share. “Sales of nut and plant beverages grew by 9% in 2018 and had sales of $1.6 billion, according to the Plant Based Foods Association.

  • Retail Consolidation. It doesn’t help when, say, Dollar General merges with Family Dollar. That gives the dollar stores increased leverage on price. And that’s just one example.

  • “The BigBox Effect.” The biggest retailers have become increasingly private label focused and, in turn, vertically integrated. Take Walmart, for example. In 2018, the retailer opened its first U.S. food production facility in Indiana. Want to guess what kind of food? Why would we be mentioning it? This new facility amounted to a 100mm gallon loss of volume to Dean Foods.

  • “The Loss Leader Effect.” We often talk about the venture-backed subsidization of commonplace lifestyle items, e.g., Uber Inc. ($UBER). Retailers have, in recent years, aggressively priced private label milk to drive foot traffic. “As retailers continue to invest in private-label milk to drive foot traffic, private label margin over milk contracted to a historic low of $1.26 in June, before falling even further to $1.24 in September.

  • Freight Costs. They’ve been up over the last few years. This is a different version of
    ”The Amazon Effect” ($AMZN).

All of these are secular issues that a balance sheet solution won’t remedy. Buyer beware. 😬🤔

So, what CAN the bankruptcy achieve? Yes, the obvious: the balance sheet. Also, there is a contingent liability of over $722.4mm that results from the company’s participation in an underfunded multi-employer pension plan. And liquidity: the bankruptcy will avail the company of a $850mm DIP credit facility. It may also allow the company to pursue a sale transaction to its long-time commercial partner and largest single raw milk vendor, Dairy Farmers of America (which is wed $172.9mm). Surely they must be aware of the secular trends and will price any offer accordingly, right? RIGHT? Either way, those ‘23 notes look like they might be about to take a bath.*

*Likewise certain trade creditors. The debtors state that that they have $555.7mm of total outstanding accounts payable and claim $257mm needs to go to critical vendors and another $189.2mm to 503(b)(9) admin claimants. That leaves a small subset of creditors due a bit more than $100mm holding the bag. This also explains the sizable DIP.

Meanwhile, one of the largest unsecured creditors is Acosta Inc., with a contingent, disputed and unliquidated claim arising out of litigation. Acosta is unlikely to recover much on this claim which is a bit ironic considering that an Acosta bankruptcy filing is imminent. Womp womp.

  • Jurisdiction: S.D. of Texas (Judge Jones)

  • Capital Structure: see above

  • Professionals:

    • Legal: Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP (Brian Resnick, Steven Szanzer, Daniel Meyer, Nate Sokol, Alexander Bernstein, Charlotte Savino, Cameron Adamson) & Norton Rose Fulbright LLP (William Greendyke, Jason Boland, Bob Bruner, Julie Goodrich Harrison)

    • Financial Advisor: Alvarez & Marsal LLC (Jeffrey Stegenga, Brian Fox, Tom Behnke, Taylor Atwood)

    • Investment Banker: Evercore Group LLC (Bo Yi)

    • Claims Agent: Epiq Bankruptcy Solutions LLC (*click on the link above for free docket access)

  • Other Parties in Interest:

    • Receivables Securitization Agent, RCF Agent & DIP Agent: Rabobank USA

      • Legal: White & Case LLP (Scott Greissman, Philip Abelson, Elizabeth Fuld, Rashida Adams, Andrew Zatz) & Gray Reed & McGraw LLP (Jason Brookner, Lydia Webb, Amber Carson)

    • Unsecured Bond Indenture Trustee: Bank of New York Mellon NA

      • Legal: Emmett Marvin & Martin LLP (Thomas Pitta, Edward Zujkowski, Elizabeth Taraila)

    • Ad Hoc Group of 6.5% ‘23 Unsecured Noteholders: Ascribe III Investments LLC, Broadbill Investment Partners LLC, Ensign Peak Advisors Inc., Kingsferry Capital LLC, Knighthead Capital Management LLC, MILFAM Investments LLC

      • Legal: Paul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison LLP (Andrew Rosenberg, Robert Britton, Douglas Keeton, Grace Hotz) & Pillsbury Winthrop LLP (Hugh Ray III, William Hotze, Jason Sharp)

    • Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors: Central States Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund, The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company NA, Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation, Land O’ Lakes Inc., California Dairies Inc., Consolidated Container Company LP, Select Milk Producers Inc.

      • Legal: Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP (Ira Dizengoff, Philip Dublin, Meredith Lahaie, Martin Brimmage, Joanna Newdeck, Julie Thompson, Patrick Chen, Madison Gardiner)

      • Financial Advisor: Berkeley Research Group LLC (Christopher Kearns)

      • Investment Banker: Miller Buckfire & Co. LLC (Richard Klein)

Update 1/11/20

😷New Chapter 11 Filing - Tarrant County Senior Living Center Inc. 😷

Tarrant County Senior Living Center Inc.

November 5, 2019

Callback to earlier this year, in February, when we reported on the chapter 11 bankruptcy filing of SQLC Senior Living Center at Corpus Christi Inc. (d/b/a Mirador). Mirador — a Texas nonprofit — owned and operated a 228-unit CCRC, comprised of 125 independent living residences, 44 assisted living residences, 18 memory care residences, and 4 skilled nursing residences. It filed for bankruptcy because, among other things, it didn’t have the occupancy level — and, by extension, revenue — to satisfy its debts (owed to UMB Bank NA and others). The company used the bankruptcy process to effectuate a sale pursuant to Bankruptcy Code section 363.

We concluded our review of the situation as follows:

One last point here: considering that we now have two CCRC bankruptcies in the last two weeks and both are operated by SQLC, we’d be remiss if we didn’t highlight that SQLC also operates four other CCRCs: (a) Northwest Senior Housing Corporation d/b/a Edgemere; (b) Buckingham Senior Living Community, Inc. d/b/a The Buckingham; (c) Barton Creek Senior Living Center, Inc. d/b/a Querencia at Barton Creek; and (d) Tarrant County Senior Living Center, Inc. d/b/a The Stayton at Museum Way. With 33% of its CCRCs currently in BK, it seems that — for the restructuring professionals among you — these other SQLC facilities may be worth a quick look/inquiry.

You’re welcome. We called that from 9 months away.

Forth Worth Texas-based Tarrant County Senior Living Center Inc. filed a prepackaged bankruptcy case in the Northern District of Texas. The not-for-profit corporation has 188 independent living apartment-style residences, 42 residential-style assisted living suites, 20 memory support assist living suites and a skilled nursing facility with 46 beds. The facility is nearly completely occupied across the board with the weakest link being the independent living segment at 6.4% vacancy.

Pursuant to the Plan, only the holders of bond claims are impaired and entitled to vote. In other words, the bonds will take a haircut — and they’ve overwhelmingly voted in favor of said haircut — while general unsecured claimants and executory contract counter-parties ride through as if nothing even happened.

Nana won’t even notice this sucker filed for bankruptcy.

  • Jurisdiction: N.D. of Texas (Judge Jernigan)

  • Capital Structure:

  • Professionals:

    • Legal: DLA Piper LLP (Thomas Califano, Rachel Nanes, Andrew Zollinger)

    • Financial Advisor/CRO: Ankura Consulting (Louis Robichaux)

    • Claims Agent: Epiq Bankruptcy Solutions LLC (*click on the link above for free docket access)

  • Other Parties in Interest:

    • UMB Bank NA

      • Legal: Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo PC (Daniel Bleck, Charles Azano)

💰New Chapter 11 Filing - Yueting Jia💰

Yueting Jia

October 14, 2019

So, we’re not used to seeing individuals file for chapter 11 listing $500mm-$1b in assets and $1b-$10b in liabilities. We’ll just throw that out there. But these are interesting times and since the private markets have become the new public markets, we suppose it’s not too outlandish to see private companies — and their backers — with extraordinary balance sheets (cough, WeWork). And, by extension, bankruptcy filings.

Indeed, Yueting Jia, is an exceptional case. A serial entrepreneur, Mr. Jia, is the founder of multiple businesses over the years — most notably the LeEco streaming service and Faraday Future, a much-hyped electric vehicle company that fashions itself as a would-be competitor to Elon Musk’s Tesla Inc. ($TSLA). Faraday is owned by Smart King Ltd., an entity in which Mr. Jia holds significant equity that backs personal guarantees he’s made over the years. It’s on account of those guarantees (and several direct loans) that Mr. Jia may now add the “debtor” designation to his resume. It’ll look nice next to his other recent labels: pariah and refugee. Like we said, this is an interesting “case.”

So about those personal guarantees and loans…uh…yeah, they’re pretty extensive. There’s $279mm to Shenzhen Yingda Capital Management Co. Ltd. and $233mm to China CITIC Bank Co. Ltd., followed by at least 18 other large creditors whose security is dramatically under-secured. In other words, Mr. Jia has earned that “debtor” status.

So, what’s the plan? Well, literally, Mr. Jia has already proffered a plan that would, in exchange for broad releases of he and his wife from any claims and liability, provide certain creditors with beneficial interests in a liquidating trust. As proposed, the liquidating trust assets will include “economic rights to 40.8% of the [Smart King’s] equity consisting of 147,048,823 Class B ordinary shares currently owned by FF Top, representing 10% of the [Smart King’s] equity interest” and “a preferred distribution right in connection with 30.8% of [Smart King’s] equity interest (owned through Pacific Technology Holding LLC…and collectively owned by [Mr. Jia] and the management through the Partnership Program…,which will entitle him to a priority distribution of up to US$815.7 million (subject to certain adjustments), right after the return of capital to the management, a special distribution of 10% of the remaining amounts and thereafter, a normal distribution of 20% of the balance owned by Pacific Technology.” Wait. What? What, exactly, will creditors be getting?

Let’s take a step back. Faraday Future is one of those “yogababble” companies that Scott Galloway has recently talked about — a company chock full of mission statement bullsh*t. Per Mr. Jia:

“The Company was founded with the vision to disrupt the traditional automotive industry and create a shared intelligent mobility ecosystem that empowers everyone to move, connect, breathe and live freely.”

Founded in 2014, so far Faraday Future has disrupted nothing other than the balance sheets of Mr. Jia and several other investors. It’s “pre-revenue” which is Silicon Valley bro-code for not making any f*cking money and it hasn’t delivered any cars yet. In terms of assets, the company is really just a bucket of intellectual property and some model pre-production prototypes of its signature FF 91. Suffice it to say, then, that it hasn’t changed the way anyone moves, connects, breathes or lives. At least not yet. We suppose the good thing is that burning cash ($1.7b) doesn’t negatively affect the environment. Small victories.

Anyway, back to the plan. It’s rather circular. Mr. Jia’s interest in the company “is his primary asset.” His primary asset requires new funding to survive. The only way it can get funding is, according to Mr. Jia, if his restructuring is consummated quickly, everyone just moves on, and the company can then hunt for liquidity. Otherwise, it will follow Mr. Jia into bankruptcy. He straight up says:

If, as a result of not being able to consummate the Restructuring in a timely manner, the Company's business is not able to once again pursue its business plan, it is likely that it will not be able to continue as a going concern, it may be forced to liquidate its remaining assets and/or initiate bankruptcy proceedings….

And then the value of the Mr. Jia’s assets will likely be nothing. So, he’s basically saying to his creditors, “agree to this restructuring to give the company a hope and prayer of raising money because without it, the company is screwed, I’m screwed, you’re screwed AND, as a cherry on top, the company’s other investors, employees and creditors are screwed.” Such a hot mess.

Hang on. Why would the company be screwed? Per Mr. Jia:

“As of July 31, 2019, the Company's current liabilities amounted to US$734.3 million, with outstanding note payables of US$402.1 million to related-party lenders and third-party lenders, respectively. The Company has defaulted on some of the notes, and is currently in negotiation with such lenders for extensions or conversion of notes into equity. Several other notes will mature by the end of 2019. For example, the Company's secured note of US$45.0 million issued to certain purchasers pursuant to the note purchase agreement with U.S. Bank National Association will become due on October 31, 2019, to which the Company is seeking an extension from the lender.”

It’s currently in default, that’s why. It needs the Series B financing to help restructure its existing debt.* Which makes this EVEN BETTER: he’s offering his creditors interests in a Trust funded by stock which is currently behind debt that is currently in default!!

So, naturally, the company is also subject to a severe working capital deficit. It has burned through $580.9mm since 2018 with a total accumulated loss of $2.15b as of July 2019. It has approximately $6.8mm of cash on hand.

Wee Bey.gif

But, don’t worry. Entrepreneurial optimism remains nonetheless. Per the plan documents, Mr. Jia remains optimistic that a deal will get done, that a subsequent $850mm Series B financing will get done by January 2020, and that that will be enough to bridge the company to an IPO in 2021. This is, of course, after, the company (i) beta tests its product, (ii) builds out its CA-based manufacturing facility, (iii) firms up its supply chain, (iv) completes all testing and validation, AND (v) delivers its first 100 units of the FF 91 to the market in early Q2 ‘21. This is all great because then we can see where Professor Gallaway puts the company on this spectrum:

Screen Shot 2019-10-15 at 12.49.00 PM.png

As an inducement to voting in support of this plan, Mr. Jia provides “hypothetical figures” based on his and company management’s assumptions. Naturally, he caveats that “they may prove to have been incorrect or unfounded.” You bet your a$$ they might.

Screen Shot 2019-10-15 at 12.51.39 PM.png

By way of comparison, Nio Inc. ($NIO) actually ships cars already (3500 in Q2 ‘19) and has a 1.68b market cap (currently trading at $1.60/share). Tesla is at 46.4b. Both companies are also hemorrhaging cash.

Screen Shot 2019-10-15 at 12.57.24 PM.png

It’s good to see that the Adam Neumanns of the world haven’t sapped the world of hope.


*Notably, that $45mm piece reflects secured notes held by ex-Skadden attorney, Jack Butler, through his firm Birch Lake Holdings. The notes are secured by tangible and intangible assets (which, presumably, includes all of the IP, the only thing here that, as we writ this today, probably has any value whatsoever). An earlier $15mm term loan provided by Birch Lake was paid off in September. It had an impressive 15.5% interest rate (with a default rate of 21.5%).

  • Jurisdiction: D. of Delaware (Judge )

  • Capital Structure:

  • Professionals:

    • Legal: O’Melveny & Myers LLP (Suzzanne Uhland, Diana Perez) & Pachulski Stang Ziehl Jones LLP (Jeffrey Dulberg, Malhar Pagay, Richard Pachulski, James O’Neill)

    • Claims Agent: Epiq Corporate Restructuring LLC (*click on the link above for free docket access)

  • Other Parties in Interest:




🙈New Chapter 11 Bankruptcy - Fred's Inc.🙈

Fred’s Inc.

September 9, 2019

Dallas-based Fred’s Inc. and seven affiliated debtors have filed a long-awaited bankruptcy in the District of Delaware with the intent to unwind the business. The debtors are — or, we should say, were — discount retailers with full service pharmacies, focusing on fixed income families in small and medium-sized towns.

The bankruptcy papers — from a law firm largely known for litigation (a curious fact here until you consider that Alden Global Capital LLC is a large shareholder) — are remarkably sparse. No lengthy back story about the company and how “iconic” it is. Just, “it was founded in 1947, sold a lot of sh*t to people who have no other alternative and now we’re kaput.” No discussion of the interim, say, 70+ years. Not a mention in the First Day Declaration of the failed Walgreens/Rite-Aid transaction that would have given Fred’s a larger pharmacy footprint. Nothing about Alden’s stewardship. Nada. Not a word, outside of the motion to assume the liquidation consultant agreement, about the state of retail (and in that motion, only: “The Debtors faced significant headwinds given the continued decline of the brick-and-mortar retail industry.”). Given the case trajectory — an orderly liquidation — we suppose there’s really no need to spruce things up. There’s nothing really left to sell here.* All in, it’s, dare we say, actually kind of refreshing: finally we have a debtor dispensing with the hyperbole.

The debtors started 2018 with 557 locations. After four rounds of robust closures — 263 between April and June and another 178 between July and August — the debtors have approximately 125 locations remaining. Considering that those stores are now closing too and given that the average square footage per store was 14,684, the end result will be ~8mm of square footage unleashed on the commercial real estate market. We suspect that these small and medium-sized towns will have some empty storefronts for quite some time.

The debtors have a commitment from their pre-petition lenders for a $35mm DIP credit facility (which includes a rollup of pre-petition debt).

*The Debtors previously sold 179 of their pharmacy stores to a Walgreens Boots Alliance Inc. ($WBA) subsidiary for $177 million in fiscal Q4 ‘18 and 38 more to a CVS Health Corp. ($CVS) subsidiary for ~$15 million in August.

  • Jurisdiction: D. of Delaware (Judge Sontchi)

  • Capital Structure: $15.1mm RCF (+ $8.8mm LOCs), $20.9mm (Cardinal Health Inc., secured by pharmacy assets), $1.4mm in other secured debt.

  • Professionals:

    • Legal: Kasowitz Benson Torres LLP (Adam Shiff, Robert Novick, Matthew Stein, Shai Schmidt) & Morris Nichols Arsht & Tunnell LLP (Derek Abbott, Andrew Remming, Matthew Harvey, Joseph Barsalona)

    • Board of Directors: Heath B. Freeman, Timothy A. Barton, Dana Goldsmith Needleman, Steven B. Rossi, and Thomas E. Zacharias

    • Special Legal: Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP

    • Financial Advisor: Berkeley Research Group LLC (Mark Renzi)

    • Investment Banker: PJ Solomon

    • Liquidator: SB360 Capital Partners LLC

    • Claims Agent: Epiq Bankruptcy Solutions LLC (*click on the link above for free docket access)

  • Other Parties in Interest:

    • DIP Lender ($35mm): Regions Bank

      • Legal: Parker Hudson Rainer & Dobbs LLP (Eric Anderson, Bryan Bates) & Richards Layton & Finger PA (John Knight)

    • DIP Lender: Bank of America

      • Legal: Choate Hall & Stewart (John Ventola)

    • Large Shareholder: Alden Global Capital LLC

Update: 9/9/19 #19

⛽️New Chapter 11 Filing - EPIC Companies LLC⛽️

EPIC Companies LLC

August 26, 2019

Another day, another oil-related bankruptcy filing. Houston-based Epic Companies LLC and six affiliated companies filed for chapter 11 on August 26, 2019 in the Southern District of Texas (Judge Jones presiding) to effectuate a sale to its pre-petition and post-petition lender, White Oak Global Advisors LLC.* White Oak intends to credit bid $48.9mm and assume $40mm of the debtors’ debt. It then hopes to flip the assets — that’s right, flip the assets — to a secondary buyer, Alliance Energy Services LLC, for $40mm and the assumption of $35mm of debt. The debtors hope to consummate the transaction within 65 days. This is bankruptcy today folks: super speedy cases tied to aggressive DIP milestones. Why? In large part, because bankruptcy is too frikken inefficient and expensive to go about a sale transaction otherwise. This is why it’s imperative to have a robust pre-petition marketing process. Here, there’s the added element of the secondary sale.

Formed in Q1 2018, the debtors service the oil and gas industry through heavy lift, diving and marine, specialty cutting and well-plugging and abandonment services. Said another way, these guys work with oil and gas companies at the end of the well lifecycle.

Speaking of the end of lifecycles, the company has been in trouble from the get-go. After spending a year acquiring assets, the debtors already had to start divesting by April of 2019. White Oak foreclosed on equity interests in three entities in July 2019. The company still owns three heavy lift and diving vessels, other equipment, IP, and real property. They owe $106.9mm under a senior loan** and $124.8mm under a junior loan. Unsecured trade debt is $30mm. Other liabilities include litigations against the debtors’ vessels.

Why is this company in bankruptcy? They’re very to the point:

Like many in their industry, the downturn in oil and natural gas prices and other industry-related challenges negatively impacted the Debtors' liquidity position.

Consequently, White Oak called a default and has been driving the bus ever since: in July, White Oak informed management that it was done sinking money into this morass. Five days later, the debtors terminated 400 employees. 28 employees remain. Sadly, their future is decidedly more uncertain today than it was even two months ago.

*Prior to the voluntary filing, one of the debtors was involuntaried in Louisiana.

**Once White Oak exercised remedies, it then restated the debtors’ senior debt into three separate facilities. Acqua Liana, as junior lender, followed suit vis-a-vis the junior loan.

  • Jurisdiction: S.D. of Texas (Judge Jones)

  • Capital Structure: see above.

  • Professionals:

    • Legal: Porter Hedges LLP (John Higgins, M. Shane Johnson, Genevieve Graham)

    • Financial Advisor/CRO: S3 Advisors LLC (“G2”) (Jeffrey Varsalone)

    • Claims Agent: Epiq Bankruptcy Solutions LLC (*click on the link above for free docket access)

  • Other Parties in Interest:

    • Prepetition Senior Loan Lender & Postpetition Lender & Stalking Horse Purchaser: White Oak Global Advisors LLC

    • Prepetition Junior Loan Lender: Acqua Liana Capital Partners LLC

🍤New Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Filing - RUI Holding Corp.🍤

RUI Holding Corp.

July 7, 2019

Back in October 2016, in the context of Sun Capital Partners’-owned Garden Fresh Restaurant Intermediate Holdings bankruptcy filing, we asked, “Are Progressives Bankrupting Restaurants?” We wrote:

Morberg's explanation for the bankruptcy went a step farther. He noted that cash flow pressures also came from increased workers' compensation costs, annual rent increases, minimum wage increases in the markets they serve, and higher health benefit costs -- a damning assessment of popular progressive initiatives making the rounds this campaign season. And certainly not a minor statement to make in a sworn declaration.  

It's unlikely that this is the last restaurant bankruptcy in the near term. Will the next one also delineate progressive policies as a root cause? It seems likely.

There have been a plethora of restaurant-related bankruptcy filings between then and now and many of them have raised rising costs as an issue. Perhaps none as blatantly, however, than Sun Capital Partners’ portfolio companies: enter RUI Holding Corp and its affiliated debtors, Restaurants Unlimited Inc. and Restaurants Unlimited Texas Inc. (the “Debtors”).

On July 7, 2019, the Sun Capital-owned Debtors filed for bankruptcy in the District of Delaware. The Debtors opened their first restaurant in 1969 and now own and operate 35 restaurants in 6 states under, among 14 others, the trade names “Clinkerdagger,” “Cutters Crabhouse,” “Maggie Bluffs,” and ”Horatio’s.” The Debtors note that each of their restaurants offer “fine dining” and “polished casual dining” “situated in iconic, scenic, high-traffic locations.” Who knew that if you want something to scream “iconic” you ought to name it Clinkerdagger?

As we’ve said time and time again, casual dining is a hot mess. Per the Debtors:

…the Company's revenue for the twelve months ended May 31, 2019, was $176 million, down 1% from the prior year. As of the Petition Date, the Company has approximately $150,000 of cash on hand and lacks access to needed liquidity other than cash flow from operations.

The Debtors have over $37.7mm of secured debt; they also owe trade $7.6mm. There are over 2000 employees, of which 168 are full-time and 50 are salaried at corporate HQ in Seattle Washington.

But enough about that stuff. Back to those damn progressives. Per the Debtors:

Over the past several years, certain changes to wage laws in the Debtors’ primary geographic locations coupled with two expansion decisions that utilized cash flow from operations resulted in increased use of cash flow from operations and borrowings and restricted liquidity. These challenges coupled with additional state-mandates that will result in an additional extraordinary wage hike in FYE 2020 in certain locations before all further wage increases are subject to increases in the CPI and the general national trend away from casual dining, led to the need to commence these chapter 11 cases.

They continue:

Over the past three years, the Company’s profitability has been significantly impacted by progressive wage laws along the Pacific coast that have increased the minimum wage as follows: Seattle $9.47 to $16.00 (69%), San Francisco $11.05 to $15.59 (41%), Portland $9.25 to $12.50 (35%). As a large employer in the Seattle metro market, for instance, the Company was one of the first in the market to be forced to institute wage hikes. Currently in Seattle, smaller employers enjoy a statutory advantage of a lesser minimum wage of $1 or more through 2021, which is not available to the Company. The result of these cumulative increases was to increase the Company’s annual wage expenses by an aggregate of $10.6 million through fiscal year end 2019.

For a second we had to do a double-take just to make sure Andy Puzder wasn’t the first day declarant!

Interestingly, despite these seemingly OBVIOUS wage headwinds and the EVEN-MORE-OBVIOUS-CASUAL-DINING-CHALLENGES, these genius operators nevertheless concluded that it was prudent to open two new restaurants in Washington state “in the second half of 2017” — at a cost of $10mm. Sadly, “[s]ince opening, the anticipated foot traffic and projected sales at these locations did not materialize….” Well, hot damn! Who could’ve seen that coming?? Coupled with the wage increases, this was the death knell. PETITION Note: this really sounds like two parents on the verge of divorce deciding a baby would make everything better. Sure, macro headwinds abound but let’s siphon off cash and open up two new restaurants!! GREAT IDEA HEFE!!

The Debtors have therefore been in a perpetual state of marketing since 2016. The Debtors’ investment banker contacted 170 parties but not one entity expressed interested past basic due diligence. Clearly, they didn’t quite like what they saw. PETITION Note: we wonder whether they saw that Sun Capital extracted millions of dollars by way of dividends, leaving a carcass behind?? There’s no mention of this in the bankruptcy papers but….well…inquiring minds want to know.

The purpose of the filing is to provide a breathing spell, gain the Debtors access to liquidity (by way of a $10mm new money DIP financing commitment from their prepetition lender), and pursue a sale of the business. To prevent additional unnecessary cash burn in the meantime, the Debtors closed six unprofitable restaurants: Palomino in Indianapolis, Indiana, and Bellevue, Washington; Prime Rib & Chocolate Cake in Portland, OR; Henry’s Tavern in Plano, Texas; Stanford’s in Walnut Creek, California; and Portland Seafood Co. in Tigard, Oregon. PETITION Note: curiously, only one of these closures was in an “iconic” location that also has the progressive rate increases the Debtors took pains to highlight.

It’s worth revisiting the press release at the time of the 2007 acquisition:

Steve Stoddard, President and CEO, Restaurants Unlimited, Inc., said, “This transaction represents an exciting partnership with a skilled and experienced restauranteur that has the requisite financial resources and deep operating experience to be instrumental in strengthening our brands and building out our footprint in suitable locations.”

Riiiiight. Stoddard’s tenure with Sun Capital lasted all of two years. His successor, Norman Abdallah, lasted a year before being replaced by Scott Smith. Smith lasted a year before being replaced by Chris Harter. Harter lasted four years and was replaced by now-CEO, Jim Eschweiler.

A growing track record of bankruptcy and a revolving door in the C-suite. One might think this may be a cautionary tale to those operators in the market for PE partners.*

*Speaking of geniuses, it’s almost as if Sun Capital Partners thinks that things disappear on the internets. Google “sun capital restaurant unlimited” and you’ll see this:

Source: Google

Source: Google

Click through the first link and this is what you get:

Source: Sun Capital Partners

Source: Sun Capital Partners

HAHAHAHAHA. WHOOPS INDEED!

THEY DELETED THAT SH*T FASTER THAN WE COULD SAY “DIVIDEND RECAP.”


  • Jurisdiction: D. of Delaware (Judge Silverstein)

  • Capital Structure: $37.7mm (plus $1.7mm of accrued and unpaid interest)(Fortress Credit Co LLC)

  • Professionals:

    • Legal: Klehr Harrison Harvey Branzburg LLP (Domenic Pacitti, Michael Yurkewicz, Sally Veghte)

    • Financial Advisor: Carl Marks Advisory Group LLC (David Bagley)

    • Investment Banker: Configure Partners LLC

    • Claims Agent: Epiq Bankruptcy Solutions LLC (*click on the link above for free docket access)

    • Board of Directors: Stephen Cella, Jonathan Jackson, James Eschweiler

  • Other Parties in Interest:

    • PE Sponsor: Sun Capital Partners Inc.

    • Prepetition Agent & DIP Agent ($10mm): Fortress Credit Co LLC

      • Legal: Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP (Tyler Brown, Justin Paget) & Gellert Scali Busenkell & Brown (Michael Busenkell)

      • Financial Advisor: Grant Thornton LLP

    • DIP Lenders: Drawbridge Special Opportunities Fund LP, NXT Capital LLC

      • Legal: Goldberg Kohn Ltd. (Randall Klein, Prisca Kim)

Updated 7/7/19

⛽️New Chapter 11 Filing - HDR Holding Inc. (Schramm Inc.)⛽️

Jim Carrey Drill.gif

June 24, 2019

It stands to reason that businesses centered upon servicing mining and oil and gas drilling rigs may be suffering a bit in the current — and by “current,” we mean the last five-or-so years — macroeconomic environment. HDR Holding Inc., a Pennsylvania-based company started in 1900(!), along with certain debtor affiliates, produces “a variety of mobile, top-head hydraulic rotary drilling rigs that are mounted on trucks, tracks and trailers.” The company makes money by (i) manufacturing and selling their various rig models to drillers, (ii) selling consumable drill parts that naturally deteriorate over time, and (iii) servicing their equipment. For reasons that are, by now, blatantly obvious to anyone following the distressed world, oil and gas drilling hasn’t exactly been an obscenely profitable endeavor these last few years (or, in the case of certain drilling regions, EVER, really).

And so demand for the debtors’ wares is down. Per the debtors:

Given its strong connections to the oil and gas industry, the Company has faced significant challenges pervasive in the industry over the past three to five years. Numerous oil and gas producers have significantly curtailed, if not entirely ceased, drilling new wells in response to declines in commodity prices that make such projects uneconomical. The result of this trend for the Company has been a reduced demand for both new rigs and for the related consumable drill parts as existing rig assemblies are idled, which has led to the Debtors failing to meet revenue projections and maintain compliance with the covenants under their prepetition credit facilities.

Ah, yes, the debt. The debtors have approximately $20mm in debt spread out across three different term loan facilities. In an attempt to better service this debt, the debtors have pivoted their sales efforts “to a steadier mining sector” (Bitcoin, maybe? We kid, we kid), now sell aftermarket equipment, and have “managed” their workforce and expenses to preserve cash with the hope that oil and gas might cover. Spoiler alert: it hasn’t. Nevertheless, the debtors purport to have increased performance over the last few years. Just not enough to service their capital structure.

Accordingly, over the last eight months, the debtors and their advisors have pursued a sale process with the hope of selling the business as a going concern. No third-party purchaser came forward pre-petition, unfortunately, and so the debtors seek to pursue a sale to their largest pre-petition equityholder…which also happens to be their largest pre-petition lender…AND which also happens to be their proposed DIP lender (GenNx360 Capital Parters LP). The committed DIP is $6mm at 12% and the proposed purchase price is $10.3mm plus a credit bid of the $6mm DIP amount. Pursuant to the terms of the DIP, the debtors seek to have a sale hearing on or about August 19 to have some cushion in advance of the August 28 sale order milestone under the proposed DIP.

We’ll, therefore, have at least one data point by the end of summer to show us how bullish folks are vis-a-vis a recovery in the oil and gas market.

  • Jurisdiction: D. of Delaware (Judge Walrath)

  • Capital Structure: $5.3mm Term Loan A (Hark Capital I LP), $6.5mm Term Loan B (GenNx360), $6mm Term Loan C (Citizens Bank NA)

  • Professionals:

    • Legal: Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor LLP (Sean Greecher, Pauline Morgan,

    • Investment Banker: FocalPoint Partners LLC (Michael Fixler)

    • Claims Agent: Epiq Bankruptcy Solutions LLC (*click on the link above for free docket access)

  • Other Parties in Interest:

    • Largest EquityHolder & Stalking Horse Purchaser: GenNx360 Capital Partners L.P.

    • DIP Lender ($6mm at 12%): Schramm II Inc. (an acquisition vehicle created by GenNx360)

      • Legal: Winston & Strawn LLP (Carey Schreiber) & (local) Robinson+Cole LLP (Jamie Edmonson)

    • Term Loan A Lender: Hark Capital I LP

      • Legal: Perkins Coie LLP (Jordan Kroop) & (local) The Rosner Law Group LLC (Frederick Rosner)

Updated 7/7 #65