February 18, 2020
It’s a sad state of affairs when mass tort cases overrun the bankruptcy system. Between a recent deluge of asbestos cases (e.g., ON Marine Services Company LLC, Paddock Enterprises LLC, and DBMP LLC), opioid cases (e.g., Purdue Pharma, Insys Therapeutics), global warming and negligence cases (PG&E) and sexual abuse cases (e.g., USA Gymnastics, one diocese after another), Wachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz is correct to declare “A New Era of Mass Tort Bankruptcies” in a recent client report. They recently wrote:
The use of the bankruptcy process to address mass tort liability reflects a growing recognition that chapter 11, while imperfect, provides tools for dispute resolution that are not generally available in federal or state courts.
And:
For companies that have insufficient assets to pay claims in full, bankruptcy ensures that the debtor’s limited assets are distributed equitably among claimants, including “future” claimants (those whose claims have not yet manifested). Chapter 11 can allow companies with tort liabilities to maintain operations, thereby continuing to generate funds to make payments over time, while providing a respite from defending lawsuits and a platform to negotiate settlements. Bankruptcy also provides a mechanism for centralizing the resolution of large numbers of tort claims, including through a court estimation of the aggregate liability, greatly reducing litigation costs and increasing the potential for a global settlement.
The purposes of these filings?
The wave of asbestos-related bankruptcies in the 1980s led Congress to enact Bankruptcy Code provisions to facilitate reorganization of debtors facing asbestos claims by establishing a plaintiffs’ trust funded by cash, proceeds of insurance policies, and equity in the reorganized debtor. In exchange for contributing to the trust, the debtor and other contributors receive a “channeling injunction,” which “channels” all existing and future claims to the trust. Upon resolution of the bankruptcy, such claims are brought against and paid by the trust, the debtor is discharged, and other contributors are released from further liability. While the relevant Bankruptcy Code provisions apply by their terms only to asbestos-related claims, similar mechanisms have been used (or are currently contemplated) in the bankruptcies of Takata (defective airbags), Pacific Gas & Electric (wildfire damages), and several Catholic dioceses (abuse claims).
Enter Sidley Austin LLP here. Sidley Austin is widely-credited for the notion that a channeling injunction could be deployed in the Takata chapter 11 case. It’s no wonder, then, that they’d land another major mass tort case and deploy the same playbook. Boy Scouts are well-accustomed to playbooks.
And deploy the playbook, they will.
The Boy Scouts of America are involved in 275 lawsuits currently pending in state and federal courts across the United States. They are also aware of an additional 1,400 claims that have not yet filed. Recently enacted legislation that extended the statute of limitations — passed in 17 states, including 12 in 2019 — led to a deluge of additional recently filed suits against the BSA. Consequently, the BSA spent more than $150mm on settlements and legal costs from 2017 through 2019 alone. Compounding matters, membership and donations are on the decline. BSA registered membership is down 500k since 2012. People are dropping the Boy Scouts HARD.
The BSA has filed a plan of reorganization and disclosure statement along with their customary first day papers. Where the rubber will meet the road is at the asset level. Per the BSA:
…attorneys for abuse victims believed that certain Local Councils with significant abuse liabilities have significant assets that could be used to compensate victims.
The Local Councils, however, are not debtors. There is, though, an ad hoc committee of Local Councils, the purpose of which is to allow the Local Councils to participate in negotiations about a global resolution of abuse claims. The Local Councils share insurance with the BSA and insurance, naturally, will be a huge source of recovery for abuse claimants. Claimants will also want to understand whether Local Councils are being used to shield assets from attack — a strategy exposed in this recent Wall Street Journal piece. This issue appears to be key to the bankruptcy and any potential resolution. The volunteer chair of the Local Council Committee? Richard Mason of Wachtell. Forgot to mention that one in the aforementioned client alert.
