Restaurants (Short Kitchens, Long Bikes)

Options abound for food these days - particularly if you live in an urban area. You can get your food sent to you in kits (Hello Fresh and Blue Apron), as groceries (Amazon FreshFresh Direct) or from restaurants via the gazillion delivery services that are duking it out with one another AND capitalizing upon the rise in co-cooking kitchens (CaviarPostmates, Grubhub and UberEats). We could fill 6 minutes of a$$-kicking reading just by continuing the list.

Here's the thing: much like the consumer products e-commerce space - where shipping is cutting into retail margins bigly - food delivery is killing your favorite restaurant. Why? Well, Captain Obvious, there are too many hands in the pot. As The New Yorker highlights (must read), "over-all profit margin has shrunk by a third, and that the only obvious contributing factor is the shift toward delivery." Ruh roh.

The piece is shocking in how ignorant every seems to be about the effect of delivery services on restaurant margins. This bit also struck us, "It’s worth noting that, even while charging restaurants steep rates, most delivery platforms are not yet profitable, either. Their hope is that order volumes will one day become high enough—and couriers will deliver enough orders per hour—to push them into the black." The alleged answer? A kitchen within a kitchen. Uber "is nudging restaurants to embed “virtual restaurants” inside their kitchens—picture a burger joint housing, at Uber Eats’s behest, a cookie company that exists only as a menu on the delivery provider’s site. DoorDash, an Uber Eats competitor, has started to experiment with leasing remote kitchen space to restaurants so that they can expand their delivery radii. If such practices catch on, it’s easy to imagine a segment of the restaurant economy that looks a lot like, well, Uber, with an army of individual restaurants designed to serve the needs of middle-man platforms but struggling to make a living themselves." This is "progress" folks. 
 

Amazon is Coming After Liquor Delivery

Short the "Three-Tier System" for Liquor Sales

On the heels of Amazon's Whole Foods acquisition, the company is launching liquor delivery in more parts of the United States. Bezos seems to be laying off the liquor on his way to getting jacked but he sure AF wants you boozing like a frat boy. And he's doing everything he can to make that easier: including allowing you to order a six-pack through Alexa. Whoa. 

Liquor delivery is no easy thing. But complex problems haven't stopped Bezos before. The entire liquor supply chain ought to be very concerned - and that includes startup delivery services like Postmates, who are increasingly counting on booze delivery to grow. 

Jacked Bezos.jpg

Long Regulatory Disruption of "Gig Economy" Disruption

P.S. What Happened to Unicorn Homejoy LLC? 

Busted Tech? (Long Regulatory Disruption of Disruption). There are, what, 183929 Uber-for-X style companies today offering everything from weed delivery to in-home massages...? Most of these companies - Uber and Lyft included - are built on the 1099-economy where "gig" workers are framed as contractors rather than employees. Given that these companies are struggling to be profitable to begin with, it's especially helpful for these companies to avoid outlays for overtime pay, health insurance, worker's compensation, and other W-2 employee-related expenses. Except now, for the first time, a challenge to this model is seeing its day in court as a GrubHub Inc. ($GRUB) employee is suing for reimbursement of wages. Uber and Lyft have both settled prior (similar) suits out-of-court. InstacartCaviar and Postmates have also been sued. A similar lawsuit, in part, forced Homejoy LLC into an assignment for the benefit of creditors in August 2015 and Chapter 11 in late-2015.* Which is to say that many companies - of GrubHub's status and otherwise - will be watching this fight closely as it has potentially existential ramifications for the gig economy going forward. Sometimes moving fast and breaking things runs into a regulatory roadblock.

* We thought it made sense to dive a bit deeper into what ultimately happened to Homejoy LLC, which, for the uninitiated, was at one time a Y-Combinator darling valued over $1b (after approximately $64mm of funding). Why? Because more often than not companies are celebrated on the way up and quickly forgotten after they come crashing down. It should be noted what happened to the company, its employees, and its assets after the crash. Here is what we know from the bankruptcy filing and otherwise:

  • Per Re/Code, Google hired "around 20 members of Homejoy's product and engineering team." Notably, Google Ventures was one of the largest creditors of Homejoy's bankruptcy estate - to the tune of approximately $18mm. 
  • Per the company's court filing, the Google hire occurred in July 2015 and the purchase price had to be several million dollars because it subsumed not just the tech team, but enough "consideration" to payoff the company's secured credit facility from Silicon Valley Bank, fund the wind-down AND leave money in the bankruptcy estate for a liquidating trust. See below. 
Company's Bankruptcy Disclosure Statement, filed 9/15/16. 

Company's Bankruptcy Disclosure Statement, filed 9/15/16. 

  • The company sold its customer list, service provider list, trademarks and domain names to entity called ABAP Holdings Inc. Some may recall that this transfer wasn't without its own controversy. The total purchase price was $100k.
  • The company sold its remaining office equipment for $20k.
  • The company seemingly tried to sell its source code but apparently was unable to find a buyer as the bankruptcy docket reflects no motion filed with the Bankruptcy Court seeking approval of said sale.  
  • The company would have managed the wind-down without a chapter 11 filing were it not for the "gig economy" lawsuits. It is unclear whether payments were ever made to the plaintiffs out of the liquidating trust or, if so, for how much. 

Clearly this wasn't the ending that Google Ventures, First Round Capital, Andreessen Horowitz and others wanted. 

9/17/17 Update. Apparently that gig economy lawsuit with massively disruptive potential didn't get off to a hot start for the plaintiff.

Interesting Restructuring News

  • Busted Tech. Ok, not yet. But soon. Faraday Future has cancelled its plans to build a Vallejo California assembly factory - shortly after scaling back its original Nevada facility. This Techcrunch piece says that "it's unclear where the future will lead for Faraday." Seems pretty clear to us that it will lead to bankruptcy court. And, quietly, a number of (once) high-flying startups are laying people off including, notably, Postmates and Zozi ($60mm VC - Richard Branson and others). Finally, Munchery, often hailed as a top food-delivery startup, required a recap this week to survive.
  • Grocery & Sun Capital Partners. We SWEAR we are not picking on SCP here but c'mon already: now it looks like Marsh Supermarkets is in trouble as the company falls behind on rent and quietly - well, not so quietly anymore - shuts locations. So, let's recap: in the past 6 months, SCP has seen the following portfolio companies file for bankruptcy: Garden Fresh Restaurant Intermediate Holdings LLC, Limited Stores Company LLC, Gordman Stores Inc. Maybe this will be the next?
  • High Yield. Remember a few years ago when Chobani was distressed? Now you can get in on a new offering at a premium to par, it seems. Semi-related, the bidding to lend to Westinghouse in bankruptcy was reportedly pretty intense, with Apollo Investment Corporation duking it out with Goldman Sachs, Highbridge Capital, and Silver Point Finance for the privilege to finance the nuclear power company while it figures out how to restructure its business and address two incomplete installations in Georgia in South Carolina. Yield, baby, yield. 
  • Oil&Gas. That was fast. Like super fast. Seems the new owners of Samson Resources II, LLC don't share a very "long" view of the oil and gas space - despite "having discharged approximately $4 billion of debt and nearly $300 million of annual interest expense from Samson Resources Corporation," aka the previously bankrupt entity that filed in mid-2015. And distressed investors wonder where the term "vulture" comes from. PJT Partners LP was the previous banker for the company but with the Board being what it is, there's no surprise Houlihan Lokey has a piece of the action.
  • Retail. Finish Line added itself to the long line of retailers that reported dogsh*t numbers with earnings down, same store sales down, blah blah blah. Right, and approximately 40 store closures. Naturally. Also, David's Bridal was downgraded this week. The CD&R LLC owned retailer has a $520mm term loan due in 2019 and if millennials continue to flick off conventional marriage, there's no way they'll be able to sell enough gaudy wedding dresses to manage the interest expense. And, uh oh, now there appears to be a glaring hole in the "fast fashion" narrative as H&M missed expectations with declining net profit.

  • Rewind I: 3-D Printing. Not to be a broken record about this, but it is totally real. Last week we noted Adidas' plans for it and this week Under Armour followed suit. The implications for those in the supply chain can't be underestimated.
  • Rewind II: Glass Half Full. Looks like Gordmans Stores won't be a complete liquidation after all: Stage Stores stepped up and, as part of a joint venture with Tiger Capital Group and Great American Group, will acquire roughly 50 stores with an option for a handful of others. The remainder will be liquidated but this presumably means that, for now, a couple of dozen will continue to operate. At least until the inevitable Chapter 22 that occurs after next holiday season. Kidding! (Or are we?)
  • Chart of the Week